Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defining Deviancy Down
Townhall.com ^ | March 12, 2012 | Star Parker

Posted on 03/12/2012 4:10:33 AM PDT by Kaslin

In 1993, then Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan published a paper in which he coined the phrase “defining deviancy down.”

He was ringing an alarm about what he saw as a dangerous social unraveling as result of our redefining deviant behavior as normal, rather than doubling down on traditional standards of behavior.

It’s through this lens that we should view the Obama administration mandate that employers provide free contraception and sterilization and its refusal to grant an exemption to morally opposed religious institutions.

Our audacious president, as part of his ongoing enterprise to transform America, has gone beyond defining deviancy down. Abortion, sterilization, and sexual promiscuity have not just been redefined as normal. They are considered “reproductive rights” for which we all should foot the bill.

Consider Rush Limbaugh’s much ballyhooed verbal assault on a Georgetown law student for testifying before Congress in favor of forcing her Jesuit university to provide students free contraception.

In a Gallup poll done in 1969, 68 percent said pre-marital sex is wrong and 21 percent said it is not wrong. Few young women in 1969 would have felt comfortable to publicly declare they sleep around and it’s doubtful that any politician or media personality would have condoned her behavior.

By 2009, in response to the same question, 32 percent said pre-marital sex is wrong and 60 percent said it is not wrong.

Are we a fairer and more progressive nation today, or have we defined deviancy down?

If you think we’re a better nation today because sexual promiscuity is viewed as normal and acceptable, so you must also be comfortable with the rest of the social developments that go along with this.

Most notably, the transformation and breakdown of the traditional American family.

In 1960, 72 percent of American adults were married. Today 51 percent are.

The most dramatic transformation here has taken place in those communities most likely to be supporting Democrats and Obama - blacks and Hispanics.

In 1960, 14 percent of white adults had never been married. The percentage of never married blacks and Hispanics then was not much different – 17 percent.

By 2008, the percentage of never married white adults had increased to 23 percent. But among blacks it grew to 44 percent and among Hispanics 34 percent.

If you see family breakdown as a negative development, so it is clear that defining deviancy down has had the most deleterious effects on those communities in which traditional institutions were weakest to begin with.

As part of the process of defining deviancy down, the words don’t change – only their meaning changes.

So the website of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, the organization of Sandra Fluke, the young woman Limbaugh attacked, says “all people are entitled to equal protection of the law, the free exercise of rights, and the enjoyment of economic, political, and social well being.”

These noble words, which sound like they could have been written by Thomas Jefferson, are perversely interpreted to mean religious freedom may be denied to a Catholic University, while forcing it to pay for contraception and sterilization for students.

Our nation is drowning in debt, with unfunded liabilities of our Social Security and Medicare programs estimated in the range of $70 trillion.

Yet Ms Fluke’s idea of injustice is a student relating “how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn’t covered….”

This warranted a personal call from the President of the United States to assuage her hurt feelings from Rush Limbaugh’s tough language.

Today deviancy has been defined so far down it has been turned on its head. The Obama administration idea of deviant is any presumption to religious liberty and any sense that individuals should be personally responsible for the costs and consequences of their own behavior.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: contraception; familyvalues; rushlimbaugh; sandrafluke

1 posted on 03/12/2012 4:10:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Obama administration idea of deviant is any presumption to religious liberty and any sense that individuals should be personally responsible for the costs and consequences of their own behavior.

A stouthearted conservative from the Puget Sound area once upon a time, while locked in combat with homosexuals on Salon's "TableTalk" boards over the subject of "single-sex marriage", put the question of moral authority and moral majorities this way:

Who do you have to be, in order to say "should"?

The homosexuals then, and Obama now, want to stand that idea on its head and presume that anyone who asserts moral authority is an "oppressor" and "deviant" himself -- what Charles Krauthammer, expanding on Senator Moynihan, called "defining deviancy up" for white, Christian, traditional-values American citizens.

2 posted on 03/12/2012 4:21:47 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In a Gallup poll done in 1969, 68 percent said pre-marital sex is wrong and 21 percent said it is not wrong. Few young women in 1969 would have felt comfortable to publicly declare they sleep around and it’s doubtful that any politician or media personality would have condoned her behavior.

By 2009, in response to the same question, 32 percent said pre-marital sex is wrong and 60 percent said it is not wrong.

Are we a fairer and more progressive nation today, or have we defined deviancy down?

3 posted on 03/12/2012 5:01:58 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Obama administration idea of deviant is any presumption to religious liberty and any sense that individuals should be personally responsible for the costs and consequences of their own behavior.

                                     I am Deviant.


4 posted on 03/12/2012 5:07:12 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...a Georgetown law student for testifying before Congress...

It was a stinkin' press conference, not a congressional hearing.

5 posted on 03/12/2012 5:24:13 AM PDT by CPOSharky (The only thing straight, white, Christian males get is the blame for everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yet Ms Fluke’s idea of injustice is a student relating “how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn’t covered….”

That "claim" by Fluke really stood out to me, as well. If true (which I question), how pathetic.

Good article....thanks for posting, Kaslin.
6 posted on 03/12/2012 5:30:15 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In the view of her defenders, Ms Fluke is not a slut after having admitted to using $3000 in contraceptives in three years. Indicating that they must spend MUCH more. So are her defenders admitting to being sluts?


7 posted on 03/12/2012 5:35:57 AM PDT by Boiling point
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson