Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bigotry on the Playing Field (NYT editorial)
New York Times ^ | March 11, 2012

Posted on 03/12/2012 7:14:12 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Intolerance seems to be part of the message sent to student-athletes on the sporting fields of Texas. Only under legal pressure and public criticism did the Texas Association of Private and Parochial Schools, which organizes competitions for more than 200 schools, recently agree to accommodate an Orthodox Jewish school and reschedule a basketball game that would have violated the Sabbath.

The association’s ignorance and bigotry toward Islamic schools is more stunning. As reported in The Times, one Islamic high school that sought to join the association, known as Tapps, in 2010 got a questionnaire that asked the school: “It is our understanding that the Koran tells you not to mix with (and even eliminate) the infidels. Christians and Jews fall into that category. Why do you wish to join an organization whose membership is in disagreement with your religious beliefs?” It also asked: “What is your attitude about the spread of Islam in America?”

The school, the Iman Academy SW in Houston, wanted to join the local soccer competition. It filled out the questionnaire and was denied membership. “Our kids are just as American as their kids,” an academy official said. “We just wanted to play ball.” At least two other Islamic schools declined to respond to the questionnaire.

Tapps also has surveyed member schools about allowing in Islamic schools. Sixty-three percent of 83 respondents rejected Islamic schools for membership in 2010, according to school officials. The others said it was in Tapps’s best interest to be open. Ten schools said they would quit Tapps if Islamic members were admitted.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: islam; muslimstudents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Da Coyote

21 posted on 03/12/2012 7:49:14 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’ll bet the NYT editors sneered at Eric Liddell in “Chariots of Fire”.


22 posted on 03/12/2012 7:51:39 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (I'm a constitutionalist, not a libertarian. Huge difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Question 3.) If you lose a football game. Would you want to kill the infidel?

Answer: yes Muslim Football Players in Dearborn Heights Arrested for Assault on Christian Quarterback.

The team from the Islamic school REALLY did not like losing 48-6 last October, so four of them ripped off the opposing quarterback's helmet and punched and kicked him into a concussion.

23 posted on 03/12/2012 7:52:38 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I love the line “Our kids are just as American as their kids”. It is a line born of the Socialists and their partners in crime, the GOP Country clubbers, who have insisted on the open borders policy since its inception in the 1960’s as co-authored by Edward Kennedy. What it really says is that anyone with the price of a ticket into the U.S. is “American”. And of course it neatly dodges the issue of the inherent religious intolerance of the writ into the Muslim religion. Ah, but the sword will one day fly both ways. I hope I live long enough to see the Muslim cohorts brutally clearing the California beaches of their stoned, bikini clad hedonist trash one fine summers day. Already in parts of LA the “religion of tolerance” is forcing the closing of liquor stores in and near their neighborhoods by acts of planned “swarm” violence wherein they trash the liquor stores in the name of Allah. By promoting the Muslim interests above all other religions in the hopes they’ll work to close the Christian churches, the Socialists are sowing the seeds of destruction of their precious pluralistic, multi-cultural hell.


24 posted on 03/12/2012 8:06:43 AM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rich21IE

Why wouldnt they want these fun loving religion of peace fanatics join and change their league?


25 posted on 03/12/2012 8:15:39 AM PDT by redflash ("A dog is a dog until you look him in the face, then he is Mr. Dog!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Texas Association of Private and Parochial Schools

An organization created, no doubt, to be able to control the exposure of their students to the riff-raff of the world.


No....TAPPS was created to provide an umbrella organization to allow private schools in Texas to compete athletically and academically the same way the University Interscholastic League does for public schools. Home schooler in communities are allowed to join together and apply for admission.
26 posted on 03/12/2012 8:20:48 AM PDT by TexanByBirth (Free Republic: where they may agree with the message, but they love to shoot the messenger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

That sounds like a legitimate question to me.
A Moslem High School joining Tapps looks someone is using the school to infiltrate the organization. First they join, then they demand “reasonable” concessions on issues that “offend” them, then Katy bar the door...


27 posted on 03/12/2012 8:21:25 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I don’t favor prejudice against any school

I do, even to the point of amending the first amendment to say, freedom of religion for all religions who do not advocate murdering people of other religions.

Is it "prejudice" to detest people who want to kill you? Be certain, the mooselimbs want to kill every non mooselimb, starting with the Jews and Christians - and in that order.

Screw them, I don't even want them breathing our country's air.

28 posted on 03/12/2012 8:25:12 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VA_Gentleman
When I was a kid in the 80s, whenever there was a Jewish holiday, our soccer team just played short a few guys.

This is a Jewish school team, presumably all the players are Jewish. Plus, these are private schools we're talking about.

29 posted on 03/12/2012 8:29:06 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

“Why must we be tolerant to the intolerant?”

Islam does not, cannot, must not deserve nor receive the same Constitutional protections as do the other religions — precisely because Islam is MORE THAN just a “religion”, but is a political and behavioral cult cloaked beneath the guise of being a religion.

We have only to look to Western Europe to see the harbinger of being “tolerant” towards Islam. Even though the Europeans may still have the chance to turn things around. from a realistic viewpoint it looks to me like their time may soon run out.

I realize my assertions go against what are generally seen as the ideals of conservatism, that is, to -truly- treat everyone as “equal” regardless of who they are. It’s wrenching to read Thomas Jefferson’s beautiful language in his Declaration and conclude that what he wrote was idealistic, rather than based on the realities of the world.

But the core of conservatism is to see, understand, and accept reality as it is, not as we “wish it could be” (see “liberalism” for that journey).

The reality is that all religions are NOT “alike”, and that there is at least one in the world that poses a clear, direct and imminent danger to everyone else. To give that one religion the same protections as we afford all others is to give it the weapon that it will eventually use to gain power and to defeat us.

That we might - that we ARE - doing exactly this goes beyond foolishness. It heralds the loss of our own values in the face of an opposing force - a force that would enslave and dhimmify us. That we might easily prevent and nip this threat in the bud but refuse to do so in the name of “equality” is, well, delusional. It will lead to our own destruction.

My opinion only. I realize others’ may be different.


30 posted on 03/12/2012 8:36:45 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Road Glide

-——Islam does not, cannot, must not deserve nor receive the same Constitutional protections as do the other religions — precisely because Islam is MORE THAN just a “religion”, but is a political and behavioral cult cloaked beneath the guise of being a religion.———

Properly interpreted, the First Amendment can allow restrictions on Mohammed religious practice, at the state level. At the national level, immigration from Mohammedan countries must be stopped.

We must do this if we are to survive as a free people. Religious tolerance cannot include violently intolerant religions.


31 posted on 03/12/2012 8:46:15 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

As to amending the First Amendment. I knew a law professor who specialized in drafting constitutions esp for Third World countries. He freely admitted the following story.

Because he was a Jew educated by the experience of the holocaust, he drafted wonderful constitutions and then included a provision outlawing any party with goals of destroying the principles in the constitution.

In numerous countries, the worst dictators used that provision to outlaw, imprison, and kill all opposition parties.

Amending the First Amendment is not the way to go.


32 posted on 03/12/2012 8:50:47 AM PDT by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Man I love this State.


33 posted on 03/12/2012 8:59:20 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Amending the First Amendment is not the way to go.

Right. Nobody and no group should be exempt from criticism, we must object to the cries of Blasphemy or Racism when we speak up about real problems.

The 1:st Amendment for all practical purposes has a exception against yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater, but now we are hushed even though there is a fire.

34 posted on 03/12/2012 9:01:35 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: redflash

Can’t imagine; I hear their cheerleaders are a real “blast” (drumroll).


35 posted on 03/12/2012 9:24:56 AM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

I see your point but i don’t think this action by TAPP will create anymore terrorists than if TAPP allowed the muslim school in.

They are going to hate us and want to kill us NO MATTER WHAT

this action by TAPP doesn’t accerately the desire to kill us IMO


36 posted on 03/12/2012 9:28:46 AM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rich21IE

These leagues need to require the balls be made out of real pig skins.


37 posted on 03/12/2012 9:34:56 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

“Butts up!”

Some religion.


38 posted on 03/12/2012 9:49:24 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“At least two other Islamic schools declined to respond to the questionnaire.”

To do so would have implicated them.


39 posted on 03/13/2012 3:47:06 PM PDT by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson