Skip to comments.
Aircraft Carrier Enterprise Sets Off On Final Journey - Direction Iran
Zero Hedge ^
| March 11, 2012
| Tyler Durden
Posted on 03/12/2012 10:51:12 AM PDT by Fennie
Today, at noon Eastern, the storied aircraft carrier Enterprise, aka CVN-65, left its home port of Naval Station Norfolk one final time for its final voyage with a heading: Arabian Sea, aka Iran.
There in a week it will join CVN 72 Lincoln and CVN 70 Vinson, as well as LHD 8 Makin Island, all of which are supporting any potential escalation of "hostilities" in the Persian Gulf region.
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hormuz; iran; israel; opec; persiangulf; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
03/12/2012 10:51:17 AM PDT
by
Fennie
To: Fennie
I remembering hearing somewhere that one is to never refer to a ship's "final voyage" as it sets sail.
2
posted on
03/12/2012 10:53:26 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
one would think that would be obvious..
To: Fennie
Is a ship the size the USS Enterprise vulnerable to the type of swarm attack used against the USS Cole?
4
posted on
03/12/2012 10:57:56 AM PDT
by
Joe the Pimpernel
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: BenLurkin
It isn't her final voyage until she flys her paying-off pennant. Until then she is just a ship in commission. As needs of the fleet, you know things like a shooting war with Iran, can always extend the term of service.
5
posted on
03/12/2012 10:58:08 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Fennie
6
posted on
03/12/2012 10:58:17 AM PDT
by
SouthTexas
(You cannot bargain with the devil, shut the government down.)
To: Fennie
All the emphasis on this being the Enterprise’s final voyage is a bit disquieting as it sails for the Persian Gulf. I hope Dear Leader is not thinking about anything that might help him politically vs. what is good for the sailors, troops and the US.
7
posted on
03/12/2012 11:00:14 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Truth29
8
posted on
03/12/2012 11:01:45 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Fennie
9
posted on
03/12/2012 11:05:29 AM PDT
by
FroggyTheGremlim
(Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
To: Joe the Pimpernel
Is a ship the size the USS Enterprise vulnerable to the type of swarm attack used against the USS Cole?
Unlike the USS Cole, the USS Enterprise has belt armor so you would need a much larger bomb. Bigger the bomb, harder it is to get close. Which brings up the most important difference. USS Cole was anchored in a supposedly friendly port. They didn't think anything of a small boat in the harbor until it literally bumped into them. With a ship, under way, at sea, surrounded by escorts, it would be a much harder task. The minute you penetrated the screen the CIWS and 25mm mounts on the escorts and the carrier itself are going to engage the targets.
So in summary, possible, but unlikely as heck. If they come within range of the land based launchers a swarm of cruise missiles could overwhelm the defenses. But that leaves finger prints. So you get to do that once and then you have a real all out shooting war. Even if you are successful there are those two other CV battle groups. Each of which has an air wing that could take on Iran's air force by itself.
10
posted on
03/12/2012 11:06:14 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Truth29
IMO FWIW YMMV ETC...
The only boost I can imagine him getting from a war with Iran is a negative one. After the recent Afghanistan events, even those of us that WANT to see Iran glassed know that if he attacks them it will not be anything but token. and his ROEs will be the same crap that make us madder by the death.
His base will freak, so I just see no political upside. No one will rally round the CIC with this CIC. They haven’t in the past 2 wars or Libya. They won’t now.
To: Fennie
Anything that has to do with “Enterprise” in America will be shut down with the coming of Obama’s second term.
It all seems fitting, in a very sad sort of way.
12
posted on
03/12/2012 11:11:03 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
To: GonzoGOP
13
posted on
03/12/2012 11:13:24 AM PDT
by
Joe the Pimpernel
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: brownsfan
He’ll sell it to an Asian company rather than scarp it so more private Enterprise will be moved off-shore to other countries.
To: Fennie
Maybe Obama will “De-commision” it by handing it over to the Iranians?
15
posted on
03/12/2012 11:15:54 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: eCSMaster
16
posted on
03/12/2012 11:31:33 AM PDT
by
al_c
(http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
To: al_c
remind me why the nuclear powered cruisers were decommisioned...
To: GonzoGOP; Joe the Pimpernel
Here’s a few things to consider. The last time we were in a real all out shooting war with Iran in the Persian Gulf (the tanker war) the Navy “was still insisting it couldn’t put its carriers in the constricted waters of the gulf.” (Schwartzkopf). The Iranians were firing cruise missiles at ships in the gulf, as well as sowing mines. Those underground bunkers that we are not sure our bunker-busters could bust, could be shielding weapons other than nukes as well. Just a few things to think about.
18
posted on
03/12/2012 11:43:10 AM PDT
by
ngat
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
19
posted on
03/12/2012 12:03:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
To: RitchieAprile
remind me why the nuclear powered cruisers were decommisioned... Maybe the gubmint wants GM Volt powered cruisers. Or maybe solar. I don't know ........
20
posted on
03/12/2012 12:07:03 PM PDT
by
al_c
(http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson