Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: true believer forever

BTW, the other real problem with your article is that it isn’t an article, it’s a graphic. So you can’t actually read your citations because they are too small, and you can’t click on them because they are just an image.

So you are pretending to provide links, but aren’t really providing links, just the image of them.

I wonder how Gingrich’s organization would feel about you putting out a hit piece on the Catholic University and formatting it so it looks like it was done by Newt’s campaign?


63 posted on 03/13/2012 12:22:09 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Listen, Charles, there is no point in even trying to have a discourse with you, though I am happy to know I tried. I don’t know why, but you are a bitter tired person.

All you did was go into the links I provided, get your side of the story, without addressing the other point of view. When I posted the background material, it contained both sides, positive and negative, so people could make up their own minds. People much smarter than me, objective and balanced, weighed both sides and agreed with me. Some did not. None of them, however, were ugly to me.

The point remains the Home wanted to lease the land for ongoing income, was forced to sell it, and lost approximately 80 million dollars in revenue; posting pictures from sales brochures is not really a discussion. Catholic University also received the right of first refusal for any “high” offer they didn’t like. The Home is now falling into disrepair, and the GAO is investigating it. It’s at this point, I would usually provide a link for my info, but you are not worth the time.

But more than that, your disrespect, your dismissiveness, the way you addressed me and your baseline ugliness bespeaks a selfrighteousness that can’t be penetrated. I didn’t deserve your personal remarks. It’s the same with all Santorum supporters, the personal comments, the belittling of people, the snark and the smarm. I didn’t deserve any of that.

I have finally come to realize the ugliness of Santorum supporters stems from the fact they can’t handle the reality that true and faithful Christians, who live the gospel of grace, support a sinner like Newt – have forgiven a sinner – and want nothing to do with a sanctimonious, whited wall, holier than thou Pharisee like Santorum. Christ didn’t either. they think Newt should pay for the rest of his life for the things he’s done wrong.

I didn’t even notice the links weren’t workable because of the image, but will post them in text form when i post this again. And believe me, I will post it again and again, if it means I have to take tons of crap from people like you, I will post it again and again, because Santorum supporters, the ones who aren’t self-righteous and blind, that is, are starting to see the light.


67 posted on 03/13/2012 8:29:24 PM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson