Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On The Dumb About Solar
Solar Power World ^ | Sunday, March 11, 2012 
 | Frank Andorka

Posted on 03/13/2012 10:15:47 AM PDT by null and void

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: Wurlitzer

An advocate of solar with whom I had a discussion said that they can produce 1 kilowatt per hour per square foot. Not having anything to refute that, I asked “then why aren’t all the big businesses using it”? He told me that the oil/gas interests are “supressing” solar technology.


81 posted on 03/13/2012 11:35:51 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: null and void

LOL. Well I was trying to be reserved with my comment. These folks are so far out of their mind I would have to go to the next galaxy to have any chance to find it.


82 posted on 03/13/2012 11:39:40 AM PDT by DarkWaters ("Deception is a state of mind --- and the mind of the state" --- James Jesus Angleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
We just need the millstone cut loose and to let the horse run.

I'm willing to try it as long as we don't end up shipping it all to China.
83 posted on 03/13/2012 11:40:57 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Mind if I just call you DORK for short. Dork, listen up and listen good. Wind and solar amount to practically nothing in the overall picture of our needs. You socialist leftists idealogs can’t face the REALITY that your dream AGW/IPCC CO2 hoax has collasped and continue to try and make energy policy based on that wishful thinking while ignoring our real needs. It ain’t gonna happen for 50 to 100 years down the road. Mean while we suffer from bad energy policy from a bad president and his appointees.


84 posted on 03/13/2012 11:46:55 AM PDT by spawn44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Thanks for the article.

I think we're actually getting over the hump on some of that," Martinez said. "We're cautiously optimistic. We think it's going to be great technology."

.....The Martin system, built to last 50 years, cost $398 million, or $75 million less than budgeted, according to the utility.

What? They spent $400M and are cautiously optimistic that this is GOING TO BE a great technology?

What the hell did the environmental disaster that this solar plant caused cost to clean up? What did it cost to be shut down for 3 months while the disaster was addressed?

85 posted on 03/13/2012 11:47:34 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe
I'm willing to try it as long as we don't end up shipping it all to China.

Oddly enough, that's precisely what obama's blocking the Keystone XL pipeline is forcing Canada to do.

86 posted on 03/13/2012 11:55:37 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1148 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: null and void

He is such an IDIOT, must be all that funny stuff Obama used to smoke.


87 posted on 03/13/2012 12:03:31 PM PDT by onthegulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hey Frank, get back to me when I can fly from Houston to Chicago on a 100% solar jet plane the size of a 737.


88 posted on 03/13/2012 12:18:05 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Solar is highly ineffective.

Using an electric car is still the same as using gas because your electricity mostly comes from oil and gas; in addition, if you had more cars plugging in for recharge you’d have to ration the home use of energy to maybe 6 hours a day.

Lastly, the wind technology is a great idea, but the spinning blades have huge repair costs, the wind isn't consistent and it is a historic loser.

I think we are decades away from any real answer to non-oil energy. The answer is IMO getting some kind of storage battery that isn't toxic that charges from the sun quick.

We are blowing it in three areas we can now do something about.
More hydro plants. Water turns wheels that make electricity and they don't have to pollute.
Desalinization plants for water should be looked into. They are used now on ships for thousands of people daily and that works.
We should open up our oil capacity.

89 posted on 03/13/2012 12:25:17 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

My 14-yr-old just did a Science Fair project: “Is [home-based] Solar Power Worth it?”. Short answer: No...
...Even with the subsidies.
...Even with assuming that the cost of the money to buy the system was zero.
...Even when assuming constant panel performance over at least 20 years.
...Even with assuming that you Build Your Own panels! (Okay, in that scenario you made about $2 a month over 20 years).

To buy enough power to zero your electric bill in my area, with an average family’s consumption would have required 63 high-density panels... and the roof space simply wasn’t there.

I prepped her for the questioning to expect... As predicted, she had one envirowhacko in the judge list. He wanted her to assume higher electricity costs than existed, to consider the coal plants offset (we actually run mostly off of a nuke plant here), and to evaluate areas around the world instead of just her home area... all which had nothing to do with the cost analysis that was her project.

Oh, and she managed an honorable mention award at Regionals after winning at her school.


90 posted on 03/13/2012 12:32:45 PM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Frank Andorka

Frank put the Dork in Andorka. Frank, if there were no government subsidies, there would be no wind energy business and there would be little solar except for highly specialized uses or for heating hot water.

1. There’s no solar energy business yet.

2. My colleagues over at Windpower Engineering and Development could probably speak to this more effectively than I can, but here are some of the stats on Limbaugh’s “non-industry,” courtesy of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA):





91 posted on 03/13/2012 12:42:36 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Interesting that they can create more KW per Sq Foot than the sun produces.

Giving your source the benefit of the doubt, maybe he was looking at a sq meter which would still fall short of that KW figure.

The fact that the greenies HAVE to suppress (like they claim the oil companies do) it is damn hard to surpass the amount of energy stored in a gallon of gasoline.

They make all sorts of claims to ignorant journalists (who are never experts in any field) knowing fully well the journalist will not check the numbers.

From Solar Estimate.org

On average (as a general "rule of thumb") modern photovoltaics (PV) solar panels will produce 8 - 10 watts per square foot of solar panel area. For example, a roof area of 20 feet by 10 feet is 200 square-feet (20 ft x 10 ft). This would produce, roughly, 9 watts per sq-foot, or 200 sq-ft x 9 watts/sq-ft = 1,800 watts (1.8 kW) of electric power.

92 posted on 03/13/2012 1:05:32 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

Don’t forget every power company in the Country is mandated to waste 20% of their money on solar/wind by law. So we subsidize these boondoggles and then force companies to buy these overpriced liberal windmills.

Pray for America


93 posted on 03/13/2012 1:27:11 PM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: onthegulf
He is such an IDIOT, must be all that funny stuff Obama used to smoke.

I didn't know "pole" could have that drastic and long lasting of an affect (when smoked).

94 posted on 03/13/2012 1:32:57 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Hey Frank, get back to me when I can fly from Houston to Chicago on a 100% solar jet plane the size of a 737.

In order for you to witness that technology, you might have to make the leap of faith into another technology, cryogenics.

95 posted on 03/13/2012 1:35:01 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I just read that if you add up the entire world production of wind energy and rounded it to the nearest whole number...it would be zero percent of the energy produced.

Solar exists at the levels it is today only because of subsidizing by the democrats. It is a false economy that will break down instantly if the taxpayer dollars supporting it go away.


96 posted on 03/13/2012 1:39:54 PM PDT by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

Great thread.


97 posted on 03/13/2012 1:59:33 PM PDT by Big Giant Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

I’ll still ask my great-great-great gandson for his ID and proof of geneaology!


98 posted on 03/13/2012 2:21:00 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Frank... Dude!

Without the federal and state subsidies (working raxpayer money) there would be no solar jobs at all!

What did each existing solar industry employee cost the taxpayer?
I'm thinking about $400,000 each.

They might all as well be public employees.

Meanwhile, in the distant future, there will be an uptic in the honest employment sector keeping all those solar systems working, unless the morons who bought into the scam simply junk the damned things.

You think Prius batteries are toxic? Wait til you have millions of lead batteries to be recycled. No way to store power---- no "solar" industry!

99 posted on 03/13/2012 2:50:09 PM PDT by Publius6961 (“It’s easy to make phony promises you can’t keep.” - Obama, Feb23, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Frank Andorka obviously lives someplace where there are huge solar and wind generating stations supplying entire cities and millions of vehicles with energy.

He lives where you can drive into the solar station and refill your vehicle with sunpower.

So, Frank, where do you live that this is all taking place.

I’m betting you drive a fossil fuel powered car and that your connected to the current grid. And....that you’re being intentionally obtuse.


100 posted on 03/13/2012 2:58:36 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson