Skip to comments.Gingrich stays on, sets sights on Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas, California
Posted on 03/13/2012 10:51:12 AM PDT by Red Steel
Birmingham, Ala. -- The question for Republican Newt Gingrich is not whether he will stay in the presidential race after Tuesday's primaries in Alabama, Mississippi and Hawaii. The question is where he'll take the campaign next.
The Gingrich campaign provided the latest answer, announcing plans to head to Illinois and Louisiana later this week even as most polls offered little certainty about how Tuesday's contests would turn out. Gingrich, a former House speaker who represented Georgia, had predicted victories in nearby Alabama and Mississippi. But more recently he and his advisers have revised expectations to say that even a "strong" showing was enough to go on.
How Gingrich can keep going with little momentum and much doubt about his chances is uncertain. On Tuesday, for instance, the chairman of Alabama's Republican Party, Bill Armistead, predicted in an interview on CNN that if Gingrich loses Mississippi and Alabama, "he's out of the ball game."
Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond said the former House speaker has his sites set on upcoming contests in Illinois, Texas, Wisconsin and even California, the last of which doesn't hold a vote until June. Hammond also said that the campaign is planning a "floor whip operation" for the Republican National Convention in Tampa in August, planning to meet Gingrich's oft-spoken promise to stay in the race to the convention.
"I''ve instructed the press corps to take down time now so they're ready for the next month," Hammond told reporters Tuesday.
Hammond dismissed questions about fundraising, saying that Gingrich is raising enough money to advertise this week in both Mississippi and Alabama. However, both ad buys are on cable channels (less expensive than broadcast), and Hammond would not say how big the buys are.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Newt is delusional. He is a good debater and has some appeal in the Deep South. But, beyond that, he is unelectable in a General Election. He simply has too much baggage.
Give Newt time to work a state on the ground and he will move his poll numbers quickly upward. Newt is the best face-to-face candidate running bar none.
In three of those four states, he has a long way to go to reach second.
Newt will do fine. :-)
Make that four out of four. He is in 3rd by eleven in Texas, seventeen in Wisconsin, nineteen in Illinois, and eight in California (because Santorum slipped and has not yet recovered there.) That’s a lot of minds to change.
I think your analysis of Newt’s baggage is way off.
Newt’s baggage will be irrelevant old news in the general election. As far as anyone knows, he has been faithfully married for 10 years, and he’s 68 years old. So he is not going to be turning the White House into his own pleasure palace like Clinton did, Even in spite of his past he was never a serial sexual harasser or womanizer. It’s ancient news and I really don’t think he will lose votes over it if he wins the nomination.
As for his other “baggage,” everyone knows, or will know during the general election, that he was completely exonerated of the 84 ethics charges filed during his tenure as Speaker by David Bonior’s reprehensible harassment campaign.
Newt’s debating strength is certainly unequaled, but more to the point, he has proven that he can work Congress. His strategic and tactical vision is extraordinarily clear and well defined. He has a clear agenda and a historical perspective that is desperately needed. He comes across as completely Presidential — clear, unflappable, strong. He will make Obama look foolish during the general election.
“I’’ve instructed the press corps to take down time now so they’re ready for the next month,” Hammond told reporters Tuesday.
I find that sentence hilarious. I thought this week was supposed to be the Week of Newt. If the Press takes time off then what about the momentum out of AL and MS? I am not saying he is going to get any, but with that sentence it seems as if Newt feels he won’t get any momentum at all from the South. Good Luck Newt. If nothing else you sure have changed the way a primary is run.
They're having a hard time keeping up with Newt who is being kind and gentle is giving those guys some rest. LoL.
Yeah, whatever. Frankly, I need to see him win some primaries outside the South (or even take 2nd) before I change my opinion of him.
Too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...(do they believe it yet? - No - keep going)too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...
Are you convinced yet? NO? OK.too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...too much baggage...repeat...
What baggage does he have, that hasn’t already been thrown out there? And what baggage does he have that no one else has?
If it weren’t for single issue voters, I highly doubt Santorum would even be in the picture. Which is one of the problems with the Republican/Conservative side of the house. The Dem’s vote Dem, no matter what.
Romney is nothing but a Northeast Liberal, which is conservative compared to the radicals that run the governments in the Northeast. And all he does is throw his money around, and still barely wins.
Again, Newt cannot seem to win ANY primaries outside of the South. He is a flawed candidate. Deal with it.
Newt is easily the most intelligent candidate in this campaign, with an unsurpassed record of getting conservative things accomplished. Nobody's remotely close.
He has "baggage" because he's been the most maligned: Most of the baggage is false, out-of-context BS or wildly exaggerated.
Rick is not all that articulate. I agree with him as much as I agree with Newt, but Take-the-Bait Santorum in a debate against Obama? That is frightening, (though the way Obama's going, maybe anyone could beat him....I'm thinking Thaddeus McCotter could beat him).
Obama has baggage, lots of it, and mostly criminal.
We are trying to defeat BHO2, remember?
The first “baggage” Newt “acquired,” was his 26 yr old high school science teacher, he was 17. You see anything wrong with this? Today, she would be looking for a new job after she got out of prison. But never mind that, they married after he graduated and he had his first child at 19 and another shortly thereafter. DID NEWT QUIT? Hell no, he got is undergraduate degree, then his masters, then his doctorate. He became a US Congressional rep and became speaker of the house......does anyone know the remarkable success story this is, with the odds against him at 19. I don’t and you don’t know what the facts are in that marriage, but it was doomed from the beginning. His second marriage was with a manipulative, vindictive woman. They were separated four years and the interviews she gave during that time were vicious. They tried a reconciliation which failed. I would say he met Callista during the separation. Four years is a long time. So get over the “baggage” it means nothing.
Newt will be having a rally down the street from my office in Illinois tomorrow. Awesome.
Bishop Rick is delusional.
Right. The point I am trying to make is that the mantra of saying baggage seems like a broken record.
Baggage is only baggage as long as some idiot wants to carry it, and I am sick of hearing about marital problems as baggage.
They never said anything about baggage for Reagan, who as I recall, had more than one wife.
Attacking conservatives by smears of this kind are clearly not helping the process to defeat Obama.
But I suppose wee could repeat that Newt has baggage kind of like using worry beads, because it is so helpful.
Nice! Will you be able to see/attend?
I’ll bet Newt’s “ baggage” was used the first time by a member of the MSM, in the late 90’s as a diversion to Bill Clinton’s escapades. Like good little conservatives their garbage is repeated, as truth when the occasion arises, usually by the wily RINO.
What I do is try to get out information based on research of candidates poltical records and how that matches up with their present poltical positions.
Honesty is what elections should all be about. If a person running for office isn’t honest before the election, they will not be honest afterwards while in office.
Romney. A total disconnect. Essentially a liberal Democrat, he is trying to get elected as a conservaitve Republican, and it isn’t working because he’s a phony, period.
Ron Paul. He signed newletters that were racist. He says he didn’t know what was in them, which in my opinion is worse. He allowed racist literature with his signature to be published and whether he did this knowingly or unknowingly, it doesn’t matter; this man is not competant to be President.
Gingrich. No surprises, he has decades long career. We know everything about him. He was pro-life and pro-2nd Amendment when he entered Congress in 1979 and he still is today. Everything he has done or stood for has been explained and he has admitted making mistakes - why he did them and why they were wrong. This is a very honest man.
Santorum. In January 2012 I knew nothing about Rick Santorum and thus had no pre-prejudices. What research I have done indicates that he is a typical establishment poltician, basically a social conservative/fiscal liberal, and facile at changing his positions as poltical reality dictates. A self-admitted pro-choice guy before being elected to congress, he has changed his opinion to being pro-life. His support of Republican candidates who are pro-choice - Arlen Specter, Christie Todd-Whitman, Mitt Romney - was based on politics. Santorum is a supporter of labor unions, of government social programs, and using the tax code to achieve social aims, all of which makes him a fiscal liberal. He has not apologized for his political mistakes - such as supporting Sonya Sotomayor for a judgeship - and takes umbrage when those are highlighted in questions from the public.
Don’t take my word for any of the above: I suggest doing your own research.
In my opinion, we are looking for a leader who can change how our government operates in Washington, D.C.
It is neither a popularity contest nor a quest for the most pious man in the U.S.A. These guys are polticians with records that should be examined closely and compared to what they say they will do once in office.
Remember that BHO2 has baggage that includes criminal acts. Nothing any of our politians have done in the past comes close to the depravity and evil of Obama.
I hope Romney comes in at least third in Texas. lol
Newt can rise above the caricature, something Romney or Santorum have no capacity for.
Oops looks like Newt can’t even win the South—his home base. Can you say EPIC FAIL??
Give me that delegate count and then run that mouth. This isn’t Nascar.
Alabama and Mississippi.
Uh, huh. And after losing both AL and MS (as a native Southerner), just what is Newt’s strategy? Oh, its not actually to win more states. Rather its to try to somehow prevail at a brokered convention by running HIS mouth. Please. The only one that will benefit is (maybe) Jeb Bush.
Face it, if he can’t even be in the top two of the GOP primary race, he has no chance in the GE. Show me ONE poll where Newt beats Obama. There aren’t any.
Don’t know about you, but I’d rather see a can of soup elected that BHO. We need to field someone who has a shot and Newt ain’t that guy. If its not clear to you by now, then it probably never will be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.