Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Denies Splitting GOP Votes
Obama's SuperPac ABC News ^ | March 13th, 2012 | Newt Video

Posted on 03/13/2012 9:03:29 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

Newt Gingrich says, "Between us, Santorum and I are stopping Romney."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: al; alabama; backstabberromney; backstabbersantorum; congress; crybabysantorum; elections; getoutnewt; gingrich; mississippi; ms; newt4romney; newtgetout; newtgingrich; newtindenial; newtsplittingthevote; obama; perot; romney; romney4romney; rossperot; saintrick; santorum; santorum4earmarks; santorum4romney; splittingthevote; spoilergingrich; spoilernewt; spoilersantorum; taxes; teaparty; teapartyrebellion; toast; usedcarsalesman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
Gingrich is 2012's Ross Perot.

Because the conservative vote is split, the liberal William Cli...er... Romney is winning.

1 posted on 03/13/2012 9:03:41 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Oh, bull.


2 posted on 03/13/2012 9:05:03 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; onyx

Gingrich and Santorum Pings


3 posted on 03/13/2012 9:05:47 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Gingrich is hoping that his hanging on like a leech will entitle him to the VP slot under Mittens.


4 posted on 03/13/2012 9:07:09 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Just send some $$ to Newt. He is doing great, blocking Mitt and establishment.
Go Newt


5 posted on 03/13/2012 9:07:35 PM PDT by jennychase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I will make this absolutely clear to you: Romney and Santorum are both fiscally liberal, big government spenders.

This nation is $16TRILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT. Neither Romney nor Santorum have any ideas for changing this situation.

Newt Gingrich does.

His leaving right now would be disastrous for this nation. Obama is responding defensively to Gingrich, not Romney, not Santorum.

When Newt goes to the convention in Tampa, he will have bargaining chips called ‘delegates’. It will matter.


6 posted on 03/13/2012 9:09:47 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Actually, in proportional delegate situations, Newt staying in really hurts Romney’s math, quite a bit.


7 posted on 03/13/2012 9:09:57 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Very happy that Mitt came in 3rd!!!



8 posted on 03/13/2012 9:11:22 PM PDT by An American! (Proud To Be An American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

===========I will make this absolutely clear to you: Romney and Santorum are both fiscally liberal, big government spenders.==========

Facts not in evidence.

http://www.redstate.com/jamesm/2012/03/11/rick-santorum-fiscal-conservative/

Romney is the lone liberal.


9 posted on 03/13/2012 9:12:58 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: An American!

Me too!

I could want Newt to stay if he were the one winning all the primaries against Mitt, but that’s just not the case.

Conservatives are choosing Santorum.

We have got to unify the conservative base around one lone candidate. If that were to happen, Romney is toast.

I could never vote for Romney. I could at least vote for Newt, but he’s not the choice.


10 posted on 03/13/2012 9:16:36 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

“So how is a senator or congressman rated a being a fiscal conservative? The National Taxpayers Union ( for years) rates members of house and senate and gives them a grade. An “A” equates to a 4.0, a “B” 3.0, a “C” 2.0 etc. In an article on the Weekly Standard by Jeffrey Anderson and Andy Wickersham they write:

“ Fifty senators served throughout Santorum’s two terms: 25 Republicans, 24 Democrats, and 1 Republican/Independent. On a 4-point scale (awarding 4 for an A, 3.3 for a B+, 3 for a B, 2.7 for a B-, etc.), those 50 senators’ collective grade point average (GPA) across the 12 years was 1.69 — which amounts to a C-. Meanwhile, Santorum’s GPA was 3.66 — or an A-. Santorum’s GPA placed him in the top 10 percent of senators, as he ranked 5th out of 50.

Across the 12 years in question, only 6 of the 50 senators got A’s in more than half the years. Santorum was one of them. He was also one of only 7 senators who never got less than a B. (Jim Talent served only during Santorum’s final four years, but he always got less than a B, earning a B- every year and a GPA of 2.7.) Moreover, while much of the Republican party lost its fiscal footing after George W. Bush took office — although it would be erroneous to say that the Republicans were nearly as profligate as the Democrats — Santorum was the only senator who got A’s in every year of Bush’s first term. None of the other 49 senators could match Santorum’s 4.0 GPA over that span.

This much alone would paint an impressive portrait of fiscal conservatism on Santorum’s part. Yet it doesn’t even take into account a crucial point: Santorum was representing Pennsylvania.”


11 posted on 03/13/2012 9:17:03 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

“So how is a senator or congressman rated a being a fiscal conservative? The National Taxpayers Union ( for years) rates members of house and senate and gives them a grade. An “A” equates to a 4.0, a “B” 3.0, a “C” 2.0 etc. In an article on the Weekly Standard by Jeffrey Anderson and Andy Wickersham they write:

“ Fifty senators served throughout Santorum’s two terms: 25 Republicans, 24 Democrats, and 1 Republican/Independent. On a 4-point scale (awarding 4 for an A, 3.3 for a B+, 3 for a B, 2.7 for a B-, etc.), those 50 senators’ collective grade point average (GPA) across the 12 years was 1.69 — which amounts to a C-. Meanwhile, Santorum’s GPA was 3.66 — or an A-. Santorum’s GPA placed him in the top 10 percent of senators, as he ranked 5th out of 50.

Across the 12 years in question, only 6 of the 50 senators got A’s in more than half the years. Santorum was one of them. He was also one of only 7 senators who never got less than a B. (Jim Talent served only during Santorum’s final four years, but he always got less than a B, earning a B- every year and a GPA of 2.7.) Moreover, while much of the Republican party lost its fiscal footing after George W. Bush took office — although it would be erroneous to say that the Republicans were nearly as profligate as the Democrats — Santorum was the only senator who got A’s in every year of Bush’s first term. None of the other 49 senators could match Santorum’s 4.0 GPA over that span.

This much alone would paint an impressive portrait of fiscal conservatism on Santorum’s part. Yet it doesn’t even take into account a crucial point: Santorum was representing Pennsylvania.”


12 posted on 03/13/2012 9:17:03 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I will make this absolutely clear to you: Romney and Santorum are both fiscally liberal, big government spenders.

LOL. Yeah right. That is why all the Commie Pinkos and Leftist that live in AL and MS gave Rick the win tonight. It is a regular San Fran/NYC down there.

Sometimes your posts make me tear up from laughing so hard.

13 posted on 03/13/2012 9:17:07 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

http://www.redstate.com/jamesm/2012/03/11/rick-santorum-fiscal-conservative/


14 posted on 03/13/2012 9:18:47 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

They only believe what he says. I’ve told you Santorum is a liar.


15 posted on 03/13/2012 9:20:01 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

It’s becoming clearer to me that if Gingrich were not in this race, Santorum would be beating Romney handily.

I just don’t see a path to the nomination for Newt. Not after tonight.


16 posted on 03/13/2012 9:22:50 PM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I think if Newt drops out a significant number of his voters goes to Romney, and be an overall loss for conservatives.


17 posted on 03/13/2012 9:23:30 PM PDT by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Sometimes your posts make me tear up from laughing so hard.

Ditto yours to me sir. And I mean that in a most complimentary way.

18 posted on 03/13/2012 9:24:56 PM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Closing down to a 2-man race at this point assures Romney’s victory. Even if it was just Santorum vs. Romney, there is no viable path for Santorum to reach 1,144 delegates. The only strategy left is to deny Romney from reaching 1,144.


19 posted on 03/13/2012 9:28:20 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oops, sorry I may have mistaken you for that lazmatazz person I think. That guy cracks me up.


20 posted on 03/13/2012 9:30:41 PM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson