Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Wins, Santorum Says It's Time 'For Conservatives To Pull Together' [Has "Burst of Momentum"]
LATimes ^ | March 13, 2012 | Michael Finnegan and John Hoeffel

Posted on 03/13/2012 11:35:26 PM PDT by Steelfish

After Wins, Santorum Says It's Time 'For Conservatives To Pull Together'

By Michael Finnegan and John Hoeffel Los Angeles Times March 13, 2012 — Rick Santorum scored two major victories in his insurgent campaign for the Republican presidential nomination Tuesday, winning the Alabama and Mississippi primaries and dealing a potentially crippling blow to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

With most of the votes tallied, Gingrich was running second in both states, followed closely by Mitt Romney.

The twin losses for Gingrich, who devoted a full week to zigzagging across the two states by bus, effectively crushed his effort to resuscitate his candidacy in the South, notwithstanding his vow Tuesday night to press forward.

For Santorum, the victories in the heart of the Republican Party's Deep South stronghold could help establish him as its lone conservative alternative to Romney. Having now won 10 contests in states spanning the nation, Santorum heads into the next round of contests in Missouri, Illinois and Louisiana with a burst of momentum.

"We did it again!" the former Pennsylvania senator told cheering supporters at a celebration in Lafayette, La.

Only Romney had little to lose in Alabama and Mississippi. The former Massachusetts governor, whose talk of eating grits and catfish proved to be awkward overtures to locals, called Tuesday's contests an "away game," forgoing the formality of an election-night party in Alabama or Mississippi to travel to New York City for fundraisers this week.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alabama; hawaii; mississippi; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2012 11:35:30 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 21twelve; Absolutely Nobama; AFPhys; afraidfortherepublic; AmericanInTokyo; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.

FReepmail “Antoninus” to be added or removed.

2 posted on 03/13/2012 11:37:39 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

According to some propagandists at Politico, Newt lost BIG, but I like Halstonin’s take:

Party: Republican
Reply #4
Mar. 14, 2012 - 1:43 AM EST

“Losing big? Ms. Gibson, I’m sorry, but your headline puts the credibility of your entire article in question. I’m no fan of Newt Gingrich, but he didn’t in any way “lose big.” The GOP nomination comes down to the delegates, not who “wins” each state, and Gingrich came in a close second in both Alabama and Mississippi- in other words he leaves with about the same number of delegates as Rick Santorum, and more than Mitt Romney (who came in third place in both states, beaten by Gingrich despite vastly outspending him in both places). Since Romney was trounced in both states, despite spending way more than Santorum, Gingrich and Paul combined, maybe Romney should drop out of the race based on this logic? Also keep in mind:

- In contrast to the generally narrow wins (for any candidate) in the primaries of the last few few weeks, Gingrich’s wins have been strong and decisive. He got nearly half the total vote in Georgia- which is far, far better than Romney did in his own home turf of Michigan- and he clobbered both Romney and Santorum in South Carolina, where Romney outspent him and the other candidates by many millions of dollars.

- South Carolina is also the only early primary where the GOP saw an increase in turnout compared to 2008, and Gingrich won it decisively. (The GOP winner in South Carolina has also been the nominee in all of the previous primary seasons, so that was no small feat on Gingrich’s part.) This suggests that Gingrich has an ability to motivate GOP voter enthusiasm in a way that his rivals don’t, especially Mitt Romney.

- Gingrich has a large number of second-place finishes in many other states, for example he did better than Santorum in New Hampshire, Florida and Nevada, he tied Romney in Oklahoma, and he beat Romney in both Alabama and Mississippi. IOW Gingrich is very much in the thick of it.

- The race is still fluid enough that it can change on a dime. This is partly because of the debates, in which Gingrich performs well. It’s also because Romney will now be focusing on attacking Rick Santorum, which can allow Gingrich to sneak in and gain broader support- just as Romney’s attacks on Gingrich allowed Santorum to sneak in and take Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota.

- We’re barely through half the primaries, and Romney in particular will be struggling with the upcoming states. Romney got a misleading boost in his delegate count thanks to the early primaries being ridiculously skewed in his favor- packed with Mormon states (among the GOP voters in the primaries and caucuses), Romney home states (Michigan- which he still almost lost- Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Maine) and states that he’d won in 2008 (Minnesota for example), and yet Romney still flopped. By contrast, the upcoming states are probably friendlier territory for Newt. He’s long had popularity in Louisiana (even more so than Alabama and Mississippi), which shares many cultural and political ties with Georgia, as well as in Arkansas.

- The most favorable scenario for Newt is probably a brokered convention, and considering his revivals before (going into Dec 2011 and in South Carolina), he could still very much be important then esp if he does well in the debates. Brokered conventions wouldn’t necessarily be damaging to either party- there’s a long history of them, and if anything it can sometimes allow them a chance to hash out their coalitional issues and improve their platform, so it could be favorable to either party using it. It may also be to the benefit of the GOP’s conservative wing, and to Gingrich in particular. Going into the winner-take-all states- like Texas and California- may pose a re-think to avoid a split in the conservative vote, but up until then, it may be advantageous for Gingrich to rack up delegates and essentially tag-team with Santorum against Romney. He would then have far more sway in the convention, and considering the unpredictability of the process thus far, could very well come back again.

Many factors at work here, but the bottom line is that it’s still relatively early in the nominating process, and Newt still has good reasons to stay in.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73986.html#ixzz1p4QnXQ5d


3 posted on 03/13/2012 11:38:39 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Add me to your “Ping” list please!


4 posted on 03/13/2012 11:39:55 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sweater Vest certainly has an ability to get democrats to vote for him in open primary states, I’ll give him that.


5 posted on 03/13/2012 11:41:57 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I like both Newt and Rick, and could vote for either. However, I find it very off putting by Newt only supporters with their constant put downs of Rick - such as sweater vest. What if Newt was continually called womanizer? We do need to pull together in this election to get the marxist out of office.


6 posted on 03/13/2012 11:46:50 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
HAWAII

RICK SANTORUM IN HAWAII (28%) HAS NOW MOVED INTO **SECOND PLACE** IN THE CAUCUSES, DISPLACING RON PAUL, to MITT ROMNEY'S 31%, COMING UP ON WILLARD'S HEELS

(16% of precincts in). Newt Gingrich last/fourth. 2:45 a.m. Eastern

7 posted on 03/13/2012 11:48:06 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

It’s over...the anti Mitt candidate HAS to be Santo...#’s wise


8 posted on 03/13/2012 11:48:52 PM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

You might like his take but it makes no difference, it was a big loss for Newt, whether you want to face it or not. Try as you may there is no way this can be painted as a victory fot Newt.

Newt is the brightest bulb in this dim trio of bulbs, but he will not win, and I for one would be very happy if he could, unlike a host of Newt supporters trying as hard as they can to be insulting to all the Social Conservatives here trying to stave of Romney.

We shall see what the morrow brings, but I for one am sick of the circular firing squad.


9 posted on 03/13/2012 11:51:01 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

WOW. Didn’t see that coming. I figured it would be Ramney/Paul and then Newt/Rick. This is surprising.


10 posted on 03/13/2012 11:53:38 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Interesting extrapolation here: Santorum appears to have won Oahu, Crazy Willard appears to have won Maui (I guess more of an upper crust retired GOP there), Ron Paul has won the Big Island of Hawaii, and Kauai is still outstanding.

HAWAII so far:

1) ROMNEY

2) SANTORUM (close. reallllllll close)

3) PAUL

4) GINGRICH

11 posted on 03/13/2012 11:53:47 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
No way a guy who voted to force workers to join a union and pay dues against their will in order to work can be called a conservative.

He's a fraud

12 posted on 03/13/2012 11:55:25 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
20% in now. Gap a little more wide now between Romney, and Santorum ("Big Ricky") in second. Vote sep. is about the same between Romney and Santoru, as it is Santorum and Paul.

Seesawed a bit so that now Romney is in the lead on Big Island, that might account for the slight widening of the Santorum-Romney gap. We will see how Kauai breaks. Anyone know if it is generally more conservative than Oahu or not? Maybe not a high turn out there perhaps.

13 posted on 03/13/2012 11:56:29 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I should add the vote sep in Hawaii (20 delegates) between all four candidates is about the same, with 20% of caucus precincts in. Something like a 400 vote sep. between each of them.....


14 posted on 03/13/2012 11:58:04 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
With 22 % reporter in.

Romney 244 34.5
Santorum 202 28.6

The gap is only 42 votes..
15 posted on 03/14/2012 12:03:15 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; All

Anyone else who is curious what is going on in the land of Steve McGarrett and Magnum PI, here is an live link to incoming totals.

http://www.cbsnews.com/primary-election-results-2012/state.shtml?state=HI


16 posted on 03/14/2012 12:03:35 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Actually, Newt does continually get scorned as a womanizer by the Santorumites here.


17 posted on 03/14/2012 12:08:23 AM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
HAWAII:

Gap (w/29 % now reporting) is now about 56 votes between Bishop Romney in FIRST and "Big Ricky" (Santorum) on his tail in SECOND. Having said that, Ron Paul coming up now in some other tabulations to be just a few votes behind Santorum for second, very close behind Rick. Newt kind of more or less stuck in a pineapple field ditch in fourth, with a 90 vote sep. between him and Paul.

Honolulu County (essentially Oahu) has flipped a bit in favor of Romney now. Santorum giving the Bishop a fight in Maui County. Interesting. Kauai Island tabulations still out. Since we are not Democrats, the mules on Molokai have not been registered to vote, nor have any dead and buried Hawaiians in Niihau.

18 posted on 03/14/2012 12:16:20 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Romney devised and pushed through legislation that requires insurance and state funds to pay for abortions with a fifty dollar deduct able.

Newt has warts, many more than Santorum, as have been often referred to here.

I would LOVE to have Newt win, but it is very unlikely.

In my state (Ohio) Santorum was not on the entire ballot and we vote for delegates. I voted for Santorum and for Newt where Santorum wasn't on the ballot. I live in a Democrat district that is a strong old school Democrat Catholic UNION Middle Class standing. On My street alone there are five Santorum signs and hundreds in the neighborhood. Almost No Newt signs and, if possible, fewer Romney signs (haven't scene any).

This is the area and demographic that the Republicans MUST TAKE. They lost it to Obama in 2008 and won it back BIG in 2010.

19 posted on 03/14/2012 12:16:38 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Well said about Ohio. We really need those Democrat votes in November which are probably now MORE THAN FED UP WITH OBAMA.


20 posted on 03/14/2012 12:18:24 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Are they using carrier pigeons out there to get the tabulations in? You wait 10 minutes to get one precinct in that adds like 20 or 30 votes. SOOOOO SLOWWWWWW.

Everyone must be on island time or something.


21 posted on 03/14/2012 12:22:46 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
It's true that Ohio is a must win state, the minute the kenyan communist won it in 2008, it was all over.

The communists in effect stole it, they tried in 2004 but were stopped by Ken Blackwell.

22 posted on 03/14/2012 12:23:22 AM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Dork ....but i’d vote for him. Still, Newt needs to be the spoiler and take this BS to convention


23 posted on 03/14/2012 12:43:06 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Newt was scorned as a womanizer long before Santorum became a factor in this race.


24 posted on 03/14/2012 12:44:29 AM PDT by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

I’m certain a Newt supporter but will accept Rick as the alternative.

And yes, I objectified his candidacy.

My thing.


25 posted on 03/14/2012 12:46:16 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I’m certain a Newt supporter but, Rick blunts Romney as does Newt.

I’m fine with this outcome even if my guy didn’t come out on top.

Newt will have a voice at convention and I hope mine is included.


26 posted on 03/14/2012 12:49:43 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Show me a true Conservative and I’ll pull in behind him and push him to a win. I don’t see a true Conservative right now in the race.


27 posted on 03/14/2012 12:51:16 AM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting "None of the Above" in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
'Sweater Vest certainly has an ability to get democrats to vote for him in open primary states, I’ll give him that. "

Does Newt wear a sweater vest?

The (only) 2 states Newt won were both open primaries.

Santorum has won 5 states that had closed primaries, and has won 4 states with open primaries.

28 posted on 03/14/2012 1:03:53 AM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Wow. That’s. Big surprise.


29 posted on 03/14/2012 1:05:10 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

WOW. Rick is keeping within 100 votes of Romney and within 4% with half the vote in. I need some sleep now. I hope when I wake up there was some sort of miracle that he pulled this off.


30 posted on 03/14/2012 1:08:30 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Give that guy a cigar. Finally a light bulb shines it’s light on the forum.

No Conservatives this time around. Who knew?

Absolutely right. Now do we keep our vital interests in Obama’s hands?

NO!!!!!!!


31 posted on 03/14/2012 1:11:58 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Sore Loserman meets Sore LoserNewt.


32 posted on 03/14/2012 1:14:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
It will probably be a Romney win, but not by a landslide, but by a hair, and then a strong anti-Romney vote in the majority in Hawaii; same story all night, same story all season. THE PARTY DOES NOT WANT ROMNEY AS NOMINEE!!!

I should add here that the vote gap between Rick and Paul is good and safe, and the vote gap between Paul and Gingrich also pretty level. Things have changed since you last looked at that post of mine. It is this gap between Romney and Santorum for first place in Hawaii that I am watching closely. At one time it was 56 vote gap, now 100 votes, all of Maui is in (Romne one), about 1/2 of Hawaii (Big Island) is in, Romney leading, and Oahu has some bit to go, with Romney slightly ahead. And mean while, in Kauai, I guess they have gone to bed without counting votes. Manana, mon. Da kine.

33 posted on 03/14/2012 1:16:49 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

AIT -
OK, you made me laugh.,,

It’s at 34-30% Mitt/Rick with 51% counted. Impossible to tell which votes have been counted. Give us a break - we’ve never done this before. Paper ballots and hand counting!

But I had a festive time standing in line with my fellow Repulicans. Everybody was happy to actually get a chance to have their opinion matter at the ballot box.Checked out the long line and no Mormons in sight - I can spot ‘em! Of course, they would be at other districts.

Voted for Rick. He’s doing far better than I expected. Nice.


34 posted on 03/14/2012 1:17:37 AM PDT by Island Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

He wasn’t a womanizer. All the slurs and smears about adultery originated with left-wing publications, trying to divert attention away from Clinton’s impeachment for perjury.


35 posted on 03/14/2012 1:35:10 AM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Nope.

R. Santorum 32.9% 93,182
N. Gingrich 31.3% 88,676
M. Romney 30.3% 85,922
R. Paul 4.4% 12,498


36 posted on 03/14/2012 1:56:49 AM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The point is no more name calling.


37 posted on 03/14/2012 2:18:35 AM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I’m enjoying your play by play. lol


38 posted on 03/14/2012 2:24:18 AM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Time To Vote for Newt


39 posted on 03/14/2012 2:34:42 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
We shall see what the morrow brings, but I for one am sick of the circular firing squad.

Ya but when it is a bunch of idiots who cares. I am so cynical of this race, the only one I can pull the lever for is Newt at this point, Rick ain't got the chops for it, and I grew up in Mass, need I say more?

Look, 2 Seniors in my circle of friends have noted the following; One said he is hoping for a brokered convention and as a Jew he is getting fonder of Palin everyday. The 2nd that said she didn't have a chance, but was all in a lather on the phone yesterday about how to get Reelz and see "The Undefeated"....

You tell me what is going on?

IMHO Buyers Remorse over what they have to choose from, and all the poo-pooing they did in regards to Sarah

She gets up on the podium @ the convention and speaks her mind all bets are off IMHO. Problem is the Weasels in the EGOP will do everything to stop it.

Newt / Palin ? works for me....

40 posted on 03/14/2012 3:06:14 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Why? The polls closed hours ago.

Next one ain't till Puerrrrto Rrrrrrico. (Which Rick and Mittens are heading for as I hear).

PS Cool font there.

41 posted on 03/14/2012 3:36:20 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Same MSM pimping Mitt as "top electable" to naive GOP voters will be the one to DISMANTLE him later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Santorums a tax and spend liberal. Last night told me one thing......... Were screwed!!!!!!!!


42 posted on 03/14/2012 3:39:52 AM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

The MSM might be right about the lack of intelligence of Republican candidates, which is only surpassed by that of the conservative voters. We had a chance to nominate a brilliant, articulate, and vastly experienced person. He has written multiple books, has a doctorate, taught war college, blah, blah, blah. But, oh no!!!!! He has been married three times, and sat on a couch with Nancy Pelosi. Oh the humanity.


43 posted on 03/14/2012 3:55:53 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
However, I find it very off putting by Newt only supporters with their constant put downs of Rick - such as sweater vest.

...as well as the scurrilous attacks on his religious faith and his concern about the breakdown of the American family. All the "St. Rick" and "Reverend Rick" name calling is just ridiculous.

44 posted on 03/14/2012 4:04:30 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All

Yes, it’s time for Conservatives to pull together, but, it’s also time for Rick to concentrate his message on the Economy, Energy (gas prices) and Foreign Policy. He must NOT allow the media to drag him back in to talking about contraceptives and he must go light on the Social Issues to prove that he is not a “Johnny-one-note” candidate.


45 posted on 03/14/2012 4:09:50 AM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Per the Exit Polling, only 4% of the people identified themselves as Democrats. We don’t know who that 4% voted for.


46 posted on 03/14/2012 4:11:23 AM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
No way a guy who voted to force workers to join a union and pay dues against their will in order to work can be called a conservative. He's a fraud ____________________________________________________________ Well then, Rome2000, we MUST destroy him. Yes; we must make sure that if he is the nominee he will go into the November General Election beaten, bruised and battered so that Obama will kick his ass and keep him out of the White House. Yessir, out of 1600 votes he cast as a Senator, that one disqualifies him. Let's stop his ass NOW. We need four more years of Comrade Obama.
(Do I really need the "sarc" tag?)
47 posted on 03/14/2012 4:17:37 AM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Did it ever occur to anyone that maybe Santorum doesn’t have a clue about the economy, energy or foreign policy? Seems to me if he had a grasp on these issues he would have some ideas of his own and brought them forward instead he mimicked Newt. Could it be that the only topic he is comfortable with IS contraceptives and religion?


48 posted on 03/14/2012 4:28:28 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sorry, Ick Santorum. You’re not getting my vote.


49 posted on 03/14/2012 4:48:27 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
Santo’s two tier tax policy and special tax for manufacturing (union) jobs tells me he is a compromised candidate as well as not having a good grasp of economics. Somebody wasted a lot of money on a law degree and a MBA when their root cause analysis always points to the problem as “sin”.
50 posted on 03/14/2012 4:51:44 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romney - Santorum: Twin Sons of Different Mothers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson