|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
|Locked on 03/14/2012 6:16:40 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:|
Skip to comments.What’s the Matter with Soledad O’Brien? (Why can't she resist defending Obama?)
Posted on 03/14/2012 6:14:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
CNNs Soledad OBrien isnt used to criticism. In the world of media elites, shes a beloved figure and an award-winning news anchor. But last week, she revealed her true, decidedly non-neutral colors. And shes not happy about the hoi polloi questioning her hallowed journalistic objectivity.
On Thursday, OBrien interviewed Joel Pollak, editor-in-chief of the late Andrew Breitbarts online empire. Breitbarts BigGovernment.com released a 1991 video of Barack Obama (then a 30-year-old law student) at a Harvard rally embracing radical racialist Derrick Bell and his push for more aggressive race-based hiring at Harvard. Bell is a proponent of critical race theory (CRT), which posits that America remains a hopelessly racist country dominated by Jews and white supremacists.
OBrien lost her cool when Pollak shed light on Bells fringe legal theories. Acting more like an Obama-campaign surrogate than a disinterested host, she angrily jumped on Pollaks mention of CRT. That is a complete misreading of critical race theory, she barked. Thats an actual theory. You could Google it and some would give you a good definition. So thats not correct.
When viewers took to Twitter to pepper OBrien with follow-up questions about critical race theory, the CNN star had a twit fit. She invited a liberal professor, Emory Universitys Dorothy Brown, on her television show to back her up and then lashed out: See? That was our critical race theory 101. Stop tweeting me. We have moved on, people.
Not so fast, sister.
Turns out that OBrien, a Harvard grad, has a rather emotional connection to Bell. As documented at my new Twitter curation/aggregation site Twitchy.com, OBrien tweeted that it was a rough day for her when Bell passed away last fall. She wrote that she had just started re-reading one of his books and mourned again: RIP Prof. Bell. OBrien also shared tributes to Bell from fellow Harvard prof and friend of Obama Charles Ogletree. Thats the same Professor Ogletree who bragged that he hid the Obama/Bell video during the 2008 campaign.
OBrien failed to disclose her pro-Bell bias to viewers before her segments.
OBrien also failed to disclose that the liberal prof who denied on her show that critical race theory had aaaaaanything to do with bashing America as a white-supremacy-ruled government actually wrote the exact opposite. In one of her own books, Brown asserted that the purpose of CRT was to highlight the ways in which the law is not neutral and objective, but designed to support White supremacy and the subordination of people of color. Oops.
OBrien is entitled to her opinions, of course. The problem is that she masks her political activism under the banner of corporate media diversity. Of multicultural heritage, OBrien has won countless accolades for her Black in America and Latino in America documentaries for CNN. The medical school at historically black Morehouse College created the Soledad OBrien Freedoms Voice Award to honor outstanding catalysts of social change. The first recipient of the activist award? Soledad OBrien, of course.
OBrien is also a card-carrying member of two racial/ethnic-centered journalism lobbying groups: the National Association of Black Journalists and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists. These organizations are inherently politicized entities that enforce a skin-color-deep ideological solidarity and push a social-justice agenda of advocacy journalism. I know because Ive fought their collective herd mentality for the past 20 years.
Liberal minority journalists have themselves acknowledged their slavish fealty to Obama and his progressive agenda. During the 2008 campaign, the NABJ, the NAHJ, and Asian American Journalists Association held a journalists of color confab where then-candidate Obama was welcomed with Justin Bieberstyle mania. One journalist squealed, He touched me! after Obamas address, which was interrupted multiple times with standing ovations, cheers, and whistles by the press.
Organizers were so concerned about public displays of Obamedia affection that they issued several warnings to their news professional members that the speech would be broadcast live on (Soledad OBriens) CNN. Professional decorum was encouraged. One wire story even fretted: Can minority journalists resist applauding Obama?
Nope, liberal minority journalists simply cant resist carrying water for Obama. Thats because their journalistic unity demands political unanimity. If you dont accept the left-leaning agenda of social change journalism, youre enabling racism. If you dont support the pursuit of racial hiring goals as a primary journalistic and academic goal, youre selling out.
Now you know the reason for OBriens thin-skinned reaction to Obamas critics. When you vet the president, you vet the media. And they dont like the narrative table-turning one bit.
Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.