Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Science Curriculum to Address Climate Change Controversy
Education News ^ | March 14th, 2012 | Julia Lawrence

Posted on 03/14/2012 2:02:21 PM PDT by Sopater

The groups currently drafting new science standards for American classrooms have decided to include a section addressing the issue of climate change. The Congressionally chartered National Academies, including the National Research Council, plan to include a document drafted last year that says that human activities have at least a partial impact on climate.

Although there’s a strong consensus in scientific literature on anthropogenic climate change, in America the issue is a source of significant controversy and debate. Just how strident the debate over climate change had become came as a surprise to one California middle school teacher:

When Treena Joi, a teacher at Corte Madera School in Portola Valley, Calif., last year showed her sixth-grade students the global-warming movie “An Inconvenient Truth”—a documentary in which former Vice President Al Gore issues dire warnings about climate change—the drama quickly spread beyond the classroom.

A father filed a formal complaint accusing Ms. Joi of “brainwashing” the students. He demanded that she apologize to her students or be fired, according to the complaint. The local school superintendent settled the matter by requiring parental permission before students viewed the movie in the future and prohibiting teachers from talking about ways to address climate change.

Ms. Joi said that this was the first time she’d been confronted by such extreme parental reaction, even though in the past she taught other subjects generally considered controversial such as evolution and sex education.

While the battle between global warming supporters and skeptics rages on in state houses, court houses, news programs and everywhere in between, it’s no wonder that school teachers have felt more than once that they are caught in the middle.

When her daughter’s ninth-grade teacher mimicked a gagging motion when discussing climate change during science class in Clifton Park, N.Y, Kimberly Danforth complained to the school science advisor for redress.

The teacher explained he was playing devil’s advocate and actually believed in mainstream climate-change theories, but Ms. Danforth, who believes children should be taught about global warming, wasn’t persuaded. “He seemed to be thumbing his nose at our values,” she said.

David Wojick, who is leading the effort, backed by a Conservative think tank the Heartland Institute, to design a scientific curriculum that challenges the conventional view of global warming, says that schools shouldn’t be seeking to teach only one side of the debate, but instead to offer a balanced view that will allow students to reach their own conclusions. Arguments like these are very familiar to Eugenie Scott, the executive director of the National Center for Science Education which has previously opposed efforts to introduce Intelligent Design into science classrooms around the country.

Like evolution, climate change is “settled science,” said Scott. “We shouldn’t fight the culture wars in the high-school classroom.”



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; agwfraud; arth; climatechange; climategate; climategate2; education; envirofascism; fakegate; gleick; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenfraud; heartlandinstitute; junkscience; publiceducation; thegreenlie
Anyone who would call either evolution or climate change "settled science" is no scientist.
1 posted on 03/14/2012 2:02:28 PM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

(Ms. Joi said that this was the first time she’d been confronted by such extreme parental reaction)

Those poor, poor teachers keep complaining that parents just don’t get involved in their children’s education. However, when parents have a problem with an obvious one-sided propaganda movie being shown to their kids, they start belly-aching about parental “extreme” reactions. Some of the teachers themselves are so brainwashed, and have so little contact with conservatives, that they seem genuinely surprised about the reactions.


2 posted on 03/14/2012 2:06:22 PM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Science is never settled.
Climate is as predictable as the economy. How’s that working out?


3 posted on 03/14/2012 2:06:56 PM PDT by steve8714 (Thank you, Andrew. I miss you already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
That's dose not belong in Science, but in Literature as Fairy Tales in Fiction.
4 posted on 03/14/2012 2:07:07 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
Science is never settled.

Exactly my point.
5 posted on 03/14/2012 2:09:08 PM PDT by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Our highly trained government education professionals are taught to deal with complaints by saying “That’s the first time has anyone has complained.” The point is to make the parent feel isolated and insecure.


6 posted on 03/14/2012 2:10:12 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Humans also stopped the rampant prarie fires that used sweep across the midwest all of the time as well as the buffallo migrations that tore up larg swaths of grassland....

As well as putting out a large number of naturally started forest fires too....

But that is seen as a negative by the enviroidiots.


7 posted on 03/14/2012 2:11:19 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Although there’s a strong consensus in scientific literature on anthropogenic climate change,

I stopped reading there. I keep hearing about this mythical "scientific consensus," but nobody ever produces a list and headcount the scientists who support anthropogenic climate change.

Meanwhile, I've got 30,000 scientists who signed a public petition rejecting the theory -- and that was back in 2007 BEFORE Climategates I & II, and the collapse of the IPCC's credibility.

If the Global Warming Alarmists in and out of the media are so damned concerned with "facts" as they claim they are, why will they not prove the "fact" that there is a consensus by ponying up some proof of that assertion.

8 posted on 03/14/2012 2:15:14 PM PDT by Maceman (Liberals' only problem with American slavery is that the slaves were privately owned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp
LET'S BRAIN WASH THE KIDDIES
9 posted on 03/14/2012 2:19:57 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will ruin your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

That’s dose not belong in Science, but in Literature as Fairy Tales in Fiction.

####

More apprpriately under:

Propaganda: Socialist: Faux Environmental Frauds


10 posted on 03/14/2012 2:21:46 PM PDT by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

They should only teach it in POLITICAL SCIENCE COURSES, or
courses that deal in POLITICAL FRAUD. If you question most anybody that believes in Climate Change for 5 minutes you will find out they have no clue about any of it other than reading the headlines of the newspapers. After the obama regime is voted out on their rear end we should pursue legal action against any government officials using
fraudulent IPCC data to fund grants and form public policy


11 posted on 03/14/2012 2:22:14 PM PDT by spawn44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
“He seemed to be thumbing his nose at our values,” she said.

Our Values? What about the values that she thumbed her nose at like freedom or capitalism? What a moron.

12 posted on 03/14/2012 2:28:28 PM PDT by johnny reb (I Have Not Yet Begun To Tea Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

“That’s the first time has anyone has complained.”

“The point is to make the parent feel isolated and insecure.”

###

Same exact battle strategy as the queer agenda’s use of such terms as “hate”, “non-inclusive”, and the utterly ridiculous “homophobia”.

They’re clearly the perverts, but they attempt to turn bedrock normalcy into the outlier.

Leftism 101.


13 posted on 03/14/2012 2:31:56 PM PDT by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; ...
Thanks for the ping.

Heartland Institute is working on Education plans also.

14 posted on 03/14/2012 2:35:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
...Ms. Joi said that this was the first time she’d been confronted by such extreme parental reaction...


It also seems like Ms Joi wasn't keeping up with current affairs and how Gore's scam movie was found to be inaccurate in the liberal UK...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth

But perhaps accuracy is not in her lesson plan...:^)

15 posted on 03/14/2012 2:37:17 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“...Climate Change Controversy”

What contraversy? I thought it was settled?


16 posted on 03/14/2012 2:38:33 PM PDT by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
Science is never settled.

Exactly right. More disgusting than the economic damage being done by global warming hysteria is the damage to science itself.

"Settled science" like Newton's Laws of Motion is never defended with the weak and unscientific argument that it's settled science [Argumentum ad populum - where an idea is claimed to be true solely because many people allegedly believe it to be so].
Newton's Laws were defended with publicly available experimental data and precise measurement accessible to any scientist . . . until Einstein refined them by finding a more broadly applicable and accurate theory.
The settled medical science on gastric freezing for ulcers and on the cause of ulcers was also defended by objective research with published and public data . . . until Barry Marshall and Robin Warren identified Helicobacter pylori as the real cause and eliminated their own profession.
Similarly for hormone replacement therapy and cancer risk, for
Ptolemy and Copernicus, for
whether Pluto is a planet or just Mickey Mouse's dog, for
earth/air/fire/water,

and the rest of the theories . . . back when science was based on the Scientific Method instead of political pull.

17 posted on 03/14/2012 2:39:49 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Naturally caused fires are essential to a balanced and healthy ecosystem.

In many cases, the heat from fire causes seeds to germinate, promoting the growth of various plants and fauna.

The lack of naturally occurring fires is primarily why many of the recent fires were so devastating. The undergrowth and dead wood hadn’t been cleared out, creating firestorms of epic proportions.

The “enviroidiots”, envirowhackos, environazis, etc. won’t permit the USFS to conduct controlled burns to clear this stuff out. And when firefighters or residents are killed, hundreds of structures burned to the ground and 100’s of millions of dollars spent on putting out fires, they are “strangely silent”.

There is quite a large difference between conservationists and environmentalists.


18 posted on 03/14/2012 2:45:55 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

When my daughter entered the junior high school there was one teacher who was known to be a big global warming alarmist. She was known for talking about it every chance she had, in History class no less. Every year she used to show “An Inconvenient Truth”. I made it known that If she did that I was going to demand that she also show “The Great Global Warming Hoax” as balance since global warming was a controversial subject. Earth day came and went with no showing of “An Inconvenient Truth” and as far as I know it hasn’t been shown since.

Another place they slip in AGW propaganda is in standardized tests. I also went in and complained about that. It’s funny because at least in the elementary school the kids aren’t taught about it. So, the kids are being tested on things they didn’t have in the class but the test only allows one answer to all the questions, pro AGW.


19 posted on 03/14/2012 2:46:20 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Mind control comes to mind. There are going to be one hell of a lot of pissed off elder kids, once they start to find out there is more to the stories they have been persuaded to believe in.


20 posted on 03/14/2012 2:53:24 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: winner3000; Sopater; steve8714; SandRat; achilles2000; Gleep; Maceman; BOBTHENAILER; EyeGuy; ...
See this thread for some MUST reading....

Climate Coup — The Politics (How the regulating class is using bogus claims )

The above thread does not have a very illuminating title ...but believe me it will make your Hair Stand Up....and explains why the Kiddies MUST believe the Leftists Propaganda ...for their Global Scheme to work!!!

Also:

Forget evolution, climate science is the most controversial subject in school

************************************************

And Senator Inhofe has just released a Book:

The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future [Hardcover]


21 posted on 03/14/2012 3:05:30 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

See the post below for how I am trying to spread the word about What Is Really Going On!


22 posted on 03/14/2012 3:10:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I noticed you are starting to advertise Jim’s book. It would be neat if it became a best seller.


23 posted on 03/14/2012 3:43:04 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Comment left at website.
The only thing settled in “anthropogenic climate change” is that there is no “consensus” except among those who conspire (out of their desire for job security) to extort grant money from the tax-payers to fund their pet theory. Those who study the actual data are far from arriving at any “consensus” over AGW . . . err, excuse me ACC (it’s latest incarnation) . . . only those who believe in the goal driven computer models believe there is any consensus. That is because computer models only tell you what the biases of the modeler are. The data don’t support the claims and anyone who spends a modicum of time studying the issue rather than blindly believing what faux scientists like Mann and Jones tell them understands that fact. Science, by definition is never “settled.” Only religious tenets, based on mythology are “settled.”
The best way to fight these lying proselytizers of the religion of global warming is by confronting them on their own websites.
24 posted on 03/14/2012 3:48:31 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
It's as low an idea as those foster by liberals, but I like it anyways!!!

WELCOME BACK, BOB!!! YOU'RE A REAL GAS!!! (I've missed your gaseous expertise)(grin)

25 posted on 03/14/2012 4:20:05 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

You bet. I saw that about Heartland’s efforts which NEED TO BE DONE.

I’ll definitely be buying Inhofe’s book. He has done such good work on exposing the lies. Even got EPA sientists to admit there was no evidence of global warming.


26 posted on 03/14/2012 4:22:45 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will ruin your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

and I’ve missed your STINGING COMMENTARY.


27 posted on 03/14/2012 4:31:49 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will ruin your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave
Hey Lizard Lip! Don'tchew be tryin ta zap me with that lightening quick-silver tongue of yours!!!

I've be a pingin ya till I wore out my ping finger an I had finally resigned to the idea that you musta fell down one of your multitudious gas holes you been diggin, dude!!!

Hey Dave the Grampa, look who just showed up after an elongated hiatius!

28 posted on 03/14/2012 4:38:49 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sopater; Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Greens have been indoctrinating California’s children for many years.

Photobucket

29 posted on 03/14/2012 4:59:27 PM PDT by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; Grampa Dave

Been usin’ dat silver tongue convincing folks in the NE how nice it is to be getting piles of money just to sign a few papers, then get piles more when the gas hits the pipeline.

Funny how thw EPA and Chu and Obummer don’t get their idiotic way in the real world, YET.

Gotta keep fightin’ the battle or they will.


30 posted on 03/14/2012 7:52:05 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will ruin your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Anyone who would call either evolution or climate change "settled science" is no scientist.

AGW is total junk 'political science".

I personally have no problem with evolution.. I learned about it via studying the experiments of the Monk, Gregory Mendel, when I was in Catholic school 50 years ago.

The Church has no problem with the theory of evolution. They only insist that God is the Creator. That species can change over time is not a shocker - we can plainly see it.

In that school, at that time, we also learned quite a bit about Creation, including daily recitations of the Apostles Creed. I believe in God, the Father almighty, Creator of heaven and earth...Knowing science, a Creator also make perfect sense. Nothing comes from nothing and there is no infinity. Matter, time and space are all connected -- all one, and have a beginning.... and an end.

I accept both Creation and Evolution and they are in no way incompatible. I see both as true and logical. And so do millions of other faithful.

If you are a 'young earth believer and want to take King James word-for-word, " that's fine. Believe as you wish. It is your freedom to do so.

But please, quit being sucked in by the the leftist game (as you can see in the above article) of comparing the bogus science of Man Made Global Warming with Evolution. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Believe what you wish about evolution, but please, stop comparing it to this current 'political science' fraud.

Our Creator could make us in any way He so chose to make us, If it took six days of 6 billion years, I don't really give a damn, and wouldn't presume to tell Him how He should have done it. It's a meaningless thing to argue about. People of Good Faith can be anywhere on that argument, and honestly, most people of faith do not disagree with evolution and it is not an affront to their faith.

But the leftist push to take control with this Global Warming scam is a clear and present danger to all of our freedoms. When you allow it to be mixed up with evolution, you are giving the leftist power mongers more ammunition to paint opponents as ignorant and anti-science!

AGW has nothing to do with evolution. Nothing. Don't make that comparison and don't allow others to make it either.

< / End Rant. > ;~))

31 posted on 03/14/2012 8:12:47 PM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
You are DA MAN!!! You're doing the Lord's work!!! Keep your eye on the ball, you're nose to the grindstone and your pedal to the metal!!!

Then try to work in that position... (smirk)

Seriesly, nail 'em down with that money for the good of America!!!

32 posted on 03/14/2012 9:36:02 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
I personally have no problem with evolution.. I learned about it via studying the experiments of the Monk, Gregory Mendel, when I was in Catholic school 50 years ago.

But would you call it "settled science"?

Believe what you wish about evolution, but please, stop comparing it to this current 'political science' fraud.

I have no idea what you're talking about. My claim is that neither is "settled science". Once we think that we're "done" because the issue has been "settled", scientific investigation stops.
33 posted on 03/15/2012 9:19:03 AM PDT by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I have no idea what you're talking about. My claim is that neither is "settled science". Once we think that we're "done" because the issue has been "settled", scientific investigation stops.

Only two questions in reply...

1. Do you think God could have done this Creation we all enjoy over the course of Billions of years via many stages and gradual changes ... or does that Creation have to confirm to a 'short earth' time line that a literal reading of Genesis provides?

2. If He had taken billions of years instead of a few thousand years, would you love Him any less?

And I'll add my warning from before. If you allow the Global Warming Crap to be confused with evolution, you only give more power to the Godless people who push this Global Warming BS.

Believe what you want. But the two topics have zero to do with each other. Don't Compare Them!

34 posted on 03/15/2012 7:43:05 PM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
1. Do you think God could have done this Creation we all enjoy over the course of Billions of years via many stages and gradual changes ... or does that Creation have to confirm to a 'short earth' time line that a literal reading of Genesis provides?

God could have done whatever He wanted, and He told us what He did in Genesis. Question to you, do you think that God could have told us how He created everyting by having it written in a book? Do you believe that His enemies would work to discredit that book?

2. If He had taken billions of years instead of a few thousand years, would you love Him any less?

Certainly not.

It really matters little what God could have done. What matters is the truth. However, you're completely missing my point. Even a staunch evolutionist who understands science would not call evolution "settled science". Believe what you want, but I'm not the one who compared them in the first place, it was stated in the article.
35 posted on 03/16/2012 6:42:29 AM PDT by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sopater; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

36 posted on 03/17/2012 9:04:28 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson