Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.-Korea free trade pact takes effect amid controversy
Chicago Tribune ^ | March 15, 2012 | Doug Palmer

Posted on 03/15/2012 4:30:47 AM PDT by 1rudeboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Last Dakotan

Please follow the whole thread before commenting on something I wrote as if a quote of mine was a stand-alone statement.


41 posted on 03/15/2012 12:26:28 PM PDT by apoxonu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: apoxonu

Run away.
Wouldn’t want a fact to pop up and hit you. LOL!


42 posted on 03/15/2012 2:17:00 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Tell ya what.

Since I was a young man when Reagan signed the US-Canada agreement and remember it well, and since I was involved in politics when GHW Bush was arguing to create a new agreement which included Mexico called NAFTA, and since Reagan wasn't in office during discussions of NAFTA, and since NAFTA was signed into law under Clinton when Reagan had Alzheimer's.

Why don't you get back to me when actual facts are posted. Better yet, quote a source showing Reagan supported adding Mexico to the agreement.

Until then, why bother?

43 posted on 03/15/2012 2:44:48 PM PDT by apoxonu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: apoxonu
Better yet, quote a source showing Reagan supported adding Mexico to the agreement.

I'll get right on that. As soon as you post the percentages you failed to provide previously. Good luck!

44 posted on 03/15/2012 4:06:16 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: apoxonu
I replied based on your reply to me.

Otherwise, I have neither the time nor interest in reading everything you write.

45 posted on 03/15/2012 4:34:08 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: apoxonu
Ok, you asked for it . . . .

You stated:

Reagan was in favor of a North American common market and reduced tariffs - BETWEEN CANADA AND THE US! Mexico was not a part and parcel and Reagan would have disagreed with that.

so lets take a look at his own words, shall we?

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity that reaches to all the free nations of this Earth. I'm speaking of the historic Free Trade Agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Next month I will be traveling to Mexico where trade matters will be of foremost concern.

Ronald Reagan, State of the Union Address, January 25, 1988.

So the only question remaining is, are you ignorant of this subject, or are you the one doing the Stalin-esque revising of history?

My money is on ignorant. Shame on you that you tried to pull a fast one. There are conservatives on this website.

46 posted on 03/15/2012 6:27:06 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I took care of it, but only because it pisses me off to see Ronald Reagan treated so badly.


47 posted on 03/15/2012 6:30:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson