Posted on 03/15/2012 10:07:40 AM PDT by Nachum
Øbama = POS
with all due respect to pieces of excrement.
Just because two lesbians are not able to produce a baby, it doesn’t mean that either are infirtle.
Also, just because the taxpayers are not required to pay for someone’s treatment, it’s misleading to use the term “barred from receiving” when referring to the hopeful recipients of tax-paid services.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Also:
There is only *one* who decides who should bear children and who should not - and I don't expect Obama to understand that.
The really interesting part of Obama's "reasoning" here is that he argues the government - which is really the people - has no right to determine that a infertile lesbian couple remain childless via lack of treatment, yet he has no problem with the government forcing the people to pay to murder the innocent child in a fertile woman's womb.
Thanks for that, I have put the links up on my site.
I’m still stuck in the late 80’s. Exactly how do you determine that somebody can be considered legally gay or lesbian? Do you have to sign an affidavit and produce witnesses that you’ve had gay or lesbian sex?
Can gay brothers or lesbian sisters marry each other?
Can a heterosexual couple have a dna test performed on their unborn child and abort it if it has a gay or lesbian gene?
Is a transgendered male to female, considered infertile and it mandated by healthcare laws that they receive infertility treatments?
——Can gay brothers or lesbian sisters marry each other?——
Lolz
And how are homo marriages consummated?
Or maybe I don’t want to know.
this language reappeared in the recent birth control debate, MSM talking point
As far as his use of 'professor', he's not a true tenure track prof, although students usually called adjuncts 'professor' anyway. Some get offended with that. I don't.
Most of the law exam questions are relatively normal as they take grey areas. Even the model answers really didn't show anything outside of subtle biases not uncommon by any professor that leans left. The Cass Sunstein reference however really caught my eye, trying to stop associating a widely maligned case like Lochner to Substantive Due Process.
Oh, wait! You meant siblings. My bad. Never mind. {;^)
Okay, that was funny.
Indeed. he wants the law to steer outcomes that are contrary to all precedent. To overturn existing laws that block the outcomes he desires. Pure radicalism.
Indeed. What prevents two sisters/brothers from marrying? No off-spring can result from their union.
The questions that you pose here are directly to the point. What we will have if these National Socialists have their was is a return to the days of the Unholy Roman Empire when brother married sister and so on....
What I find most interesting, is why we have not EVER heard from any of Prof. Obama’s students.....
Hmmmm.....you’d think SOMEONE would speak up....whether for him or against him...someone? Anyone?
Buehler? Buehler??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.