Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum be in Missouri & Illinois on Friday and Saturday. Locations and times listed.
Rick Santorum for President ^ | March 15, 2012 | Steelers6

Posted on 03/15/2012 10:19:43 AM PDT by Steelers6

Friday, March 16:

10:30am CST: Senator Santorum will hold a Rally for Rick in Osage Beach, MO.

Location: Main Street Music Hall 5845 Osage Beach Parkway Osage Beach, MO

2:00pm CST: Senator Santorum will speak to students at John Hersey High School in Arlington Heights, IL.

Location: John Hersey High School 1900 East Thomas Street Arlington Heights, IL 60004

7:00pm CST: Senator Santorum will hold a Rally for Rick in Arlington Heights, IL.

Location: Christian Liberty Academy 502 W. Euclid Avenue Grace Gymnasium (West side of building) Arlington Heights, IL 60004

Saturday, March 17:

2:00pm CST: Senator Santorum will hold a Rally for Rick in Effingham, IL.

Location: John Boos & Company 3601 S. Banker Street Effingham, IL 62401

5:00pm CST: Senator Santorum will hold a Rally for Rick in Mt. Vernon, IL.

Location: Mt. Vernon Airport 100 Aviation Drive Mt. Vernon, IL 62864

7:30pm CST: Senator Santorum will hold a Rally for Rick in Herrin, IL.

Location: Herrin High School 700 N. 10th Street Herrin, IL 62048


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: friday; santorum; saturday; schedule
Try to get to these events if you can
1 posted on 03/15/2012 10:19:48 AM PDT by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
Rick Santorum be in Missouri & Illinois...

Going for the Ebonics voters?

2 posted on 03/15/2012 10:30:51 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve; Absolutely Nobama; AFPhys; afraidfortherepublic; AmericanInTokyo; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.

FReepmail “Antoninus” to be added or removed.

3 posted on 03/15/2012 10:32:42 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina

We be dare !


4 posted on 03/15/2012 10:33:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Missouri? Missouri???? But wait, Missouri was a state “Rick swept” in that magical night right? Wait, you mean that night was meaningless in Missouri? Wait, I’m confused. /sarc


5 posted on 03/15/2012 10:33:59 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arasina

As Micheal Steele would say...Fo Shizzle.


6 posted on 03/15/2012 10:34:54 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

You Newton supporters are relentless. I do believe you are confused. Very confused.


7 posted on 03/15/2012 10:43:53 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arasina

Now Rick, dat dog be down wid it.


8 posted on 03/15/2012 11:00:35 AM PDT by Lexinom (Mitt < 1,144)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

He do?


9 posted on 03/15/2012 11:07:25 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (knowledge puffeth; information deludeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Accoring to a list I copied off FR in Feb, Missouri held it’s primary on Feb 7th.

Can anyone clear this up for me???


10 posted on 03/15/2012 11:11:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I didn’t expect you to understand, and clearly you did not.


11 posted on 03/15/2012 11:11:56 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
I didn’t expect you to understand, and clearly you did not.

Isn't it odd how many FReepers have gone mushy-headed for Rick. I know they have narrow minds because the best stuff Rick has said was already said by Newt. When Newt said it, he has a huge ego and cheated on his wife dontyaknow. When Rick repeats it, he's a freakin' conservative genius. When someone else points out a simple fact, they're stoooopid. God help us all.

12 posted on 03/15/2012 11:42:01 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trebb

They have gone mushy headed indeed. Or, perhaps, they already were which is why they have fallen for Santuckabee as a “true conservative” in the first place.

And they used Missouri as “proof” that RS was on a roll, and chalking it up as “a state win” when he won the teensie little events in Minnesota and Colorado and now, be damned, what we said about that election being a fake and a fraud was correct all along. Here comes Missouri again. And when I tease them about that, WHOOSH right over their precious little heads it goes....


13 posted on 03/15/2012 11:48:32 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Teasing ;)

Do you have to speak Ebonics to attend?? (title)


14 posted on 03/15/2012 12:18:48 PM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - we need a STEADY conservative President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
10 posted on Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:11:40 PM by ridesthemiles: “Accoring to a list I copied off FR in Feb, Missouri held it’s primary on Feb 7th. Can anyone clear this up for me???”

Missouri's presidential preference primary, in which Santorum won every county in the entire state in the first election where he was able to go head-to-head with Romney since Gingrich wasn't on the ballot, doesn't actually select any delegates.

The delegates get selected by county caucuses and most, though apparently not all, are being held this Saturday.

Missouri's primary is being attacked as a “beauty pageant” primary which wastes money for no reason. That's an issue for the state government to decide. I can see arguments on both sides of the question; our Democratic governor wants a binding primary and strongly opposed eliminating our current primary system.

My county's local Republican officials had expected the race to be over by now and weren't concerned about the caucus, but now the county party has rented the second-largest off-post venue in the Fort Leonard Wood area since nobody has any idea how many people to expect will show up this Saturday.

15 posted on 03/15/2012 1:14:10 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Would love to go if I lived in one of the two states. I went to an event he did here but wasn’t feeling well and couldn’t stay to hear more than the beginning of his speech. :( I hope a lot of people attend.


16 posted on 03/15/2012 2:11:48 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Rick Santorum For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
>> Missouri? Missouri???? But wait, Missouri was a state “Rick swept” in that magical night right? Wait, you mean that night was meaningless in Missouri? Wait, I’m confused. /sarc <<

Illinois? Illinois??? But wait, didn't the "Santorum can't beat Romney" people INSIST "Rick Santorum isn't on the ballot on at least 5 major states, including Illinois"? Wait, the Illinois State Board of Elections shows that Santorum is ON the ballot in every one of Illinois' 102 counties? Wait, Santorum is campaigning throughout Illinois and so are his delegates? So the anti-Santorum people flat out lied? Hmmm.

17 posted on 03/15/2012 3:07:57 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

not me - you barking up the wrong tree.


18 posted on 03/15/2012 4:38:38 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: C. Edmund Wright

It was all about mojo in Missouri. Thank God for Missouri or we might not have Santorum for our next President. I would love for Newt to run for Governor of Georgia. I think he would win that election.


20 posted on 03/16/2012 5:59:05 AM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
Go Santorum! We are so lucky to have President Santorum as our next President. Funny thing is that we don't deserve him, but dang God is good. He is guiding this principled Conservative with family values all the way to the White House. God Bless President Santorum and his family!!!! We are so lucky!
21 posted on 03/16/2012 6:03:18 AM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

A Hydra Is In The Mourning After Pill
OBMACARE is a Hydra a 9 headed snake
which Can only be Destroyed By A Firebrand
by L.J .Keslin http://www.theusmat.com

Of the three GOP candidates remaining opposing Mitt Romney for the presidency . Only one has had the courage to take on a what they call a third rail issue...Eugenics... and has had his character asassinated for it... He’s been lied about mis-characterized and pummeled from both sides called Archbishop, Califinate, a women hater ,, a religious nut, ..a one trick pony, and that is Rick Santorum ,,,,What’s really in the 1.76 trillion dolllar wonder called Obamacare

It is Eugenics....!; Population control.... and all that goes with it. Including cost, 1.76 trillion. To pay off a trillion dollars at $1.00 a second would take 31,564 years. At a billion dollars a second 995.70 years. There is no way to fix it It has to be killed and done by someone deeply committed to do so.

Two groups late in the last century led in Eugenic development. The Nazis and the Communists. Few know or remember how the Nazis began. First citing “health risk” “nicht rauchen” baning cigarette smoking, Then terminating Down Syndrome children, and then on to mentally defective children and adults,. then on to besides murdering opponents, races. All done to make the German Reich healthy and last a thousand years.

Eugenics explained in common words is this. And it ain’t just b/c pills, condoms, and womens rights. It’s government policy. :You surrender your individuality to the group to advance the greater good of the group. If your unhealthy or too old and you can’t work for the greater good of the group any more, you are disposed of in the way the group decides. If there are too many people , the group decides no more babiys, kill them. Now lets take the word”group” and change it for the word “ state”. Women surrender their rights when they buy into this monstrosity . That is what’s in Obamacare which is deceptively titled “The Affordable Health Care Act”

.So you go to the MSM (Main Stream Media) the so called “gate keepers” for information about these things and you find closed gates . Either it’s not mentioned at all , or downplayed, and given Obamacom talking point excuses for their reason. An example of this is how the sorcerers in the media were allowed to conjure Eugenics which is an integral part of Obama/Romneycare known as the Affordable Health Care Act magically reduce a 2000 page Hydra , a Greek legendary nine headed venomous snake that must be slain by a firebrand ,and morph it into the mourning after pill and a “womans health care issue.” .

The “gatekeepers” never called it out for what it is ..Obama and his Demo-com HHS department Secretary Selbelius who is a CINO (Catholic In Name Only and should be excommunicated period) .Yet Obamacom tzars who hail from that foreign land, the deep swamp of Acadamica are all preaching the utopian wonders of Eugenics. Why it’s the final solution (remember him ?) population control. Which is part of the Obamacare package.

Obamacare drafters who are exempt from being on Obamacare are on record and actually called it population control and demanded Catholic bishops support it.* Their statements are out there .But not mentioned by the so called gate-keepers but by the AM the alternate media, meaning radio talk shows like Limbaugh’s and websites like Britebart’s Government . Places Obama wants to shut down and will once re-elected *Joel Pollak Britebart Government .

Another issue is its constitutionality imposing a current government position on religious groups. And BTW (by the way) one group has been excluded in the “Affordable Health Care Act” for religious reasons ...the Amish....Again silence from MSM .Demanding changes of acceptance in what was traditional core cultural values held by religious groups and advancing eugenics meaning infantacide and condeming seniors to soylent green centers certainly does have a place in the political discussion.

Once upon a time there were Democrat voices who would warn when pitfalls of bad legislation appeared. Saddly there are no longer any independent voices in todays Democrat Party. Liberal watch dogs like Proxmire or Moynihan are gone . A liberal would be screaming about the benefits from private job creation projects like an iron mine in Wisconsin for a desperate area in need of jobs or the Keystone pipeline transfering oil from Canada to American refineries and support them.

A socialist or communist because of a political agenda,would reject them and they have. In each case the US Senate, and the Wisconsin state (hate the governor) senate dominated by agenda driven democrats killed both projects .They’re not just Democrats but hyphenated Demo-Coms placing their political agenda above the common good.

The Keystone pipeline and iron mine decisions which would have provided employment to thousands and reduced gas prices. Their rejection by the demo-coms should send a signal to the Republican bleeding heart establishment . “Bi-partisanship” doesn’t exist with socialists and to its leading presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Mr Romney should start realizing Obama is a “socialist”.. Everyone including the monthly liberal magazine Newsweek knows he is but Mr Romney just can’t seem to get around to saying it .

Where the Santorum campaign failed was to allow the media to describe the issue and reduce it into popping a pill. Furthurmore in Ohios case you had some local major market so called conservative talk show hosts ridiculing Santorum on this issue not just the drummers (as in venomous snake oil hustlers) on MSM.

Whether Santorum decides to shy away from this issue or re-frame it is up to him and his advisors. But he should be encouraged to re-adjust the focus. One way the Catholic bishops can help is use the mechanisms they have to do so...After all they have shut down parishes which retained the latin mass but can not speakout and act on this despicable movement ? Particularly when that is being shoved on religious groups by the Demo-Coms . Especially when they are ignoring constitutional rights...L.J.K.

This should fit on 1 page. Where lacking delegates look for duplicate races and see if they will pledge to Rick then push em ... Will be modifying my essay on my site to bring up the cost of Obamacare
Good Luck


22 posted on 03/16/2012 6:17:24 AM PDT by mosesdapoet ("The best way to punish a country is let professors run it. Fredrick the Great p/p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yes, mojo Bull sh-t. Which is what I said at the time. I admitted it was mojo, the RS shallowites refused to admit it was bullsh-t. Ironic, since exit polls showed half of RS voters would have voted for Newt if he was on the ballot.

And no, I don’t think the governor of Georgia should have 75 IQ points on the President.


23 posted on 03/16/2012 6:24:49 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
And I SURE hope they are signing up people there right in Illinois and left and giving them campaign volunteer tasks for next Tuesday. It won't be enough just to show up and hear him speak. From what I hear, Mitt Romney has his ground game in Illinois WIRED TIGHT, and this concerns me. Lots of folks may love Santorum now vs. Romney as the Conservative Alternative, but the absolute name of the game right now ASAP is to GET OUT THE VOTE on Election Day, and to do that you need an engaged infrastructure of thousands of people all across the state taking as much of that day as they can off, and calling and chiding and cajoling and double checking and giving rides if necessary to committed Rick voters. Bishop Romney's people in Illinois sounded VERY COCKY the other day about beating Rick.
24 posted on 03/16/2012 6:59:37 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Obama: Illegals will get temporary visas if they can merely claim domestic violence, male on female)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Kindly note the title of this here thread and the peaceful, happy, productive, non-aggressive-toward-any-party-intent (positively on behalf of Rick Santorum).

Your presence here and what you have offered so far, is in a word, "disruptive" and maybe goes against the Golden Rule. I believe it reflects badly upon you and your candidate to show up on a thread clearly along these lines, and disrupt with such comments. We clearly know where you stand by now on FR--and respect that, and that's perfectly fine. Sooooo....Could you maybe just maybe give it a temporary rest? I would like to ask you to stop, if anything, for me personally. I myself do not show up on any kind of Newt Gingrich organizational thread to make trouble. Can you be a good Freeper in this regard please? I will be thrilled if you take me up on this request.

25 posted on 03/16/2012 7:10:04 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Obama: Illegals will get temporary visas if they can merely claim domestic violence, male on female)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

As long as RS is a threat to get the nomination, and therefore take the country down to a humiliating defeat that will usher in four more years of unchecked liberalism, I will be hard pressed to decide politeness is the most important ingredient.


26 posted on 03/16/2012 11:20:10 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
And they used Missouri as “proof” that RS was on a roll

Sort of like Newt supporters did when they claimed he was on a roll when he won his home state of Georgia?

The reality is Santorum is on a roll. He has won the last three major primaries/caucuses.

27 posted on 03/16/2012 1:40:09 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

You jackass, Missouri that Santorum “won” wasn’t even an official contest, as we can tell because it’s still on the docket coming up.

Dont’ bother me unless you bring some kind of game. I don’t have time or appetite for total amateurs.

You totally jumped into a conversation way over your head.


28 posted on 03/16/2012 1:43:41 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
s, Missouri that Santorum “won” wasn’t even an official contest

Who cares? Whine, whine, whine.

Santorum has won 10 states, including the the last three major ones. He is the only alternative to Romney. Newt is only in the race to stop Romney from winning. He'll gladly cut a deal with Santorum to stop Romney that will make Santorum the nominee.

If you don't like that reality, curl up in the fetal position and put a blanket over your head.

29 posted on 03/16/2012 1:52:38 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Not whining, just pointing out how naive the average sweater vest geek is, something that your posts are helping me to do.


30 posted on 03/16/2012 2:38:29 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
LOL! Dude, you are hyperventilating to the point where you are starting to hallucinate.
31 posted on 03/16/2012 2:49:30 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

They have proven time and again that in order to prop up a dead horse they must tear down the guy who’s actually got a chance to beat Romney and Obummer. When that doesn’t work they call in the mods and the censors to help them out.


32 posted on 03/16/2012 2:49:38 PM PDT by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Not whining, just pointing out how naive the average sweater vest geek is

So, these kinds of insults are what the great "American Thinker" and Rush Limbaugh ghostwriter has to resort to?

Is there any doubt Rush knows who is more conservative and favors Santorum over Romney? Not in my mind.

33 posted on 03/16/2012 4:06:39 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

A woman from Illinois said she’s been getting so many robo calls against Rick, and she assumes it’s Romney, but yet she never hears Romney say what he will do.

That’s what Rick Santorum always says, that Romney never tells us what he will do.


34 posted on 03/16/2012 7:55:17 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Romney and Obama said to tell you hi. They really like you.


35 posted on 03/16/2012 7:57:34 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All

There’s a reason why these CONSERVATIVE groups gave Rick Santorum great ratings:

http://votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/27054/rick-santorum

2005 Republican Liberty Caucus – Economic Liberties Score 90%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus – Positions 87%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families – Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America – Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union – Positions 92%
2003 Concerned Women for America – Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum – Positions 87%
2003 National Journal – Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 American Conservative Union – Positions 90%


36 posted on 03/16/2012 8:00:41 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
Rick Santorum be in Missouri & Illinois on Friday and Saturday

He do?

37 posted on 03/18/2012 2:01:52 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“As long as RS is a threat to get the nomination, and therefore take the country down to a humiliating defeat that will usher in four more years of unchecked liberalism, I will be hard pressed to decide politeness is the most important ingredient.”


You have every right to refuse to be polite, and are entitled to your opinion, but not to your own facts. Recent polls of likely voters has confirmed that, far from taking our “country down to a humiliating defeat that will usher in four more years of unchecked liberalism,” if Rick Santorum is the GOP presidential nominee it will give us our best chance of defeating Obama this November. It is nearly impossible for the GOP presidential nominee to fail to carry each of FL, OH, VA and NC and get to 270 electoral votes, and Rick Santorum leads Obama by 4%, while Obama leads Romney by 4%, in an aggregate poll of these four states.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/core_four_states/election_2012_the_core_four_states

BTW, if Rasmussen polled Newt vs. Obama in those four states, it is behind Ramussen’s pay wall, so I can’t see it, but I get the feeling that had Rasmussen found that Newt was leading Obama in those four key states it would have been posted on FR already.

So if you don’t like Santorum for X or Y reason, that’s fine and dandy, but your claim that a Santorum nomination would send the GOP to a “humiliating defeat” is false, and not helpful in our mutual quest to stop Romney from winning the nomination.


38 posted on 03/19/2012 10:55:47 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

These polls now are hypothetical and meaningless, like your response.


39 posted on 03/19/2012 1:32:43 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Right, a poll of likely voters in FL, OH, VA and NC released by Rasmussen last Friday is “hypothetical and meaningless,” based solely on your say-so. Got it.

And as for your criticism of my response, I really couldn’t care less what you think. That’s the cool thing about being right: I don’t need to seek approbation from the likes of you.


40 posted on 03/19/2012 2:51:23 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Go ahead an be an idiot if you want to. It IS a hypothetical poll because there is no campaign yet between either of these guys and Obama yet. These hypotheticals have been proven over every campaign cycle to be utterly meaningless and useless except to draw in suckers like you.

The head to head match ups don’t mean diddly until there is a nominee - and the campaign between that person and Obama starts. Not until then do they have any meaning whatsoever.

But go ahead, and ignore all of history. I’m done with you.


41 posted on 03/19/2012 3:11:51 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Yawn.


42 posted on 03/19/2012 4:46:12 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sun
A woman from Illinois said she’s been getting so many robo calls against Rick, and she assumes it’s Romney, but yet she never hears Romney say what he will do.

I'm the woman from Illinois. The callers identify themselves as Romney supporters and I am STILL getting Romney phone calls.

Real leaders don't do ROBO calls.

43 posted on 03/19/2012 8:20:04 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

“I’m the woman from Illinois. The callers identify themselves as Romney supporters and I am STILL getting Romney phone calls.”

I sure hope your bring a BUNCH of friends when you vote!


44 posted on 03/20/2012 2:45:58 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson