Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Says He Would Enforce US Obscenity Laws That Obama Ignores
MSNBC ^ | March 16, 2012 | Andrew Rafferty and Alex Moe

Posted on 03/16/2012 10:56:03 PM PDT by Steelfish

Santorum Says He Would Enforce US Obscenity Laws That Obama Ignores By NBC's Andrew Rafferty

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL -- Rick Santorum accused President Barack Obama of not enforcing the country's obscenity laws and said Friday that as chief executive he would crack down on illegal pornography.

Santorum found himself answering pornography questions during a stop at an Italian restaurant here after the discovery of a statement posted in his campaign website in which he asserts that "America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography." Recent reporting has shed light on the letter in which the former Pennsylvania senator vowed to "vigorously enforce" all the country's obscenity laws, though he said the statement was posted three weeks ago.

"We actually respond to questions that we get into our campaign when they say 'What are you going to do about these issues?' And when we respond we post them up on our website. And the response is, ‘we'll enforce the law,’" said Santorum.

"I don’t know what the hubbub about that is," he said. "We have a president who is not enforcing the law, and we will."

The candidate best known for espousing family values argues on his website that pornography causes changes in the brain to both children and adults, and contributes to violence against women, prostitution and sex trafficking. "The Obama administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography," he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; 2012electionbias; antiprotestantrick; culturewar; familyvalues; freespeech; how2lose2obama; kenyanbornmuzzie; lostby18forsenate; mittromney; nannystate; nationalissuesricky; newtbotsforromney; newtgingrich; obamassillytwin; obscenity; obscenitylaws; peripheralissues; pornification; pornography; proillegalssrick; prounionsrick; rick4anticondomczar; rick4antipornczar; rick4pope; rick4proillegalsczar; rick4prounionczar; ricksantorum; ricksdebateoncondoms; ricksearch4ridicule; saintsantorum; santorum2012; santorum4censorship; santorum4obama; santorum4romney; search4dumbproblems; senatorsactimonious; tinybrain; tinyideas; tinyiq; tinysolutions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-500 next last
To: GeronL
“illegal” pornography probably refers to kiddie porn.

He's not talking about child porn. Child porn doesn't fall under obscenity laws. Child porn is the documented sexual assault of children, a whole different criminal category.

51 posted on 03/17/2012 4:46:12 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“He was unable to pull 50% in his own home state after massive ad buys and campaigning”

Carefull PA voting soon what happens if Santorum doesn’t get 50%.

What then, Do you throw Santorum under the bus?


52 posted on 03/17/2012 4:54:40 AM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This isn’t a national issue it’s a states issue and I’m kind of sick of all the petty BS coming out of the supposed Republican candidates.


53 posted on 03/17/2012 4:54:54 AM PDT by maddog55 (OBAMA: Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Saint Rick needs to S T F U about these things. Stick w the economy stupid!


54 posted on 03/17/2012 5:09:32 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon

Have never understood the movies and their desire to have one bedroom sex scene. Why, so the queer director can look at the male actor?? The only reason I can come up with.withstand


55 posted on 03/17/2012 5:16:57 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I have every reason to expect that President Santorum's War on Feeelthy Pictures will be as stunningly successful as have been the War on Poverty and the War on Drugs.

Having said that, I'd still vote for him over Romney or Obama (sigh....roll eyes to ceiling....)

56 posted on 03/17/2012 5:26:04 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio esta enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
There is a difference between

"I have no problem with kiddie porn"

and

"Those accused/convicted of kiddie porn have the same constitutional rights as those accused/convicted of murder, rape, or assault",

and there really are "many Freepers" who don't grasp that these positions are not the same.

57 posted on 03/17/2012 5:31:09 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio esta enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Does it rise to the level of government involvement?

Good question. It must if he's talking about Congressional laws that no is enforcing. Why did Congress pass them?

Not sure this ranks very high on anyone's major issues of the day, but it is an interesting question.

If these laws are too invasive, threaten freedom of speech, then we shouldn't have these laws on the book. If there are some common sense ones like libraries being able to provide filters on their computers for children, well what's wrong with that?

This is one of those issues that Santorum, once again, is being true to his beliefs (bless his heart). How he handles the fallout that will come from his stance will determine how effective a presidential candidate he wil be.....not a president.....a presidential candidate.
58 posted on 03/17/2012 5:35:25 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

1) Watching pornography triggers a very powerful brain response.

2) This brain response causes specific types of behavior patterns.

3) These behaviors have both long and short term effects on the lives of individuals, including all the suffering, sorrow and strife associated with premarital sex, single motherhood, divorce, pedophilia and the general breakup of families.

Change your 0.0005 to a 10. And realize that pornography is a weapon of the cultural and political marxists in their war against America.


59 posted on 03/17/2012 5:42:29 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Wouldn't it be refreshing to see headlines quoting Santorum with the words “economy”, “energy policy”, “Iran” or “Afghanistan”?
60 posted on 03/17/2012 5:45:50 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

The Onion says it best: “Rick Santorum Relieved No One Has Asked Him About Interracial marriage” http://www.theonion.com/articles/rick-santorum-relieved-no-one-has-asked-him-about,27630/


61 posted on 03/17/2012 5:51:00 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
If there are some common sense ones like libraries being able to provide filters on their computers for children, well what's wrong with that?

There are an infinity of possible laws out there which are "common sense" but none the less are not Constitutional.

If my city's library wants to set up computers in the children's section which are censored through a filter, the proper role of the Federal government is to butt out. That is not at all the same thing as saying that the role of the Federal government is to require filters in all library computers nationwide.

62 posted on 03/17/2012 5:51:51 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio esta enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I quite agree.

Energy, Jobs, Defense, Fed, Obamacare, are all far higher priorities than porn.

Rick’s judgment is suspect. Out of touch with the majority of voters.

Newt certainly is dialed in.


63 posted on 03/17/2012 6:00:15 AM PDT by allen08gop (Insert appropriate picture here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
--agree with both of your above posts--and am a little surprised at this thread as my post yesterday of basically the same thing (Drudge article) was pulled with no explanation after a few minutes---

and there really are "many Freepers" who don't grasp that these positions are not the same.

--I was informed on one of these threads few years ago that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" is greatly overrated, incidentally--

64 posted on 03/17/2012 6:01:57 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I think this is a 10 issue that needs to be taken seriously. Kids are being forced to make porn, sex trafficking laws should be enforced. Why should Obama ignore the laws on the books. Santorum would become the best President in the History of the United States. I look at him as someone who would clean up the United States so much. What a shame that some FREEPERS are so immoral.


65 posted on 03/17/2012 6:08:08 AM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Like so many Republicans before him, Santorum has a gift for finding issues that A) elicit a collective groan from the electorate, and, B) provide fodder for the opposition.

Say after me, Rick. LESS GOVERNMENT, LESS GOVERNMENT, LESS GOVERNMENT.....(and alternate with) HANDS OFF THE INTERNET, HANDS OFF THE INTERNET....(repeat until you get it).


66 posted on 03/17/2012 6:09:25 AM PDT by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allen08gop

Energy, jobs, defense, dumping Obamacare—these are like bread and butter, paying the rent and other immediate needs like getting out of bed in the morning and mowing the lawn regularly.

But porn is like the termites which are an unseen but evil pestilence, slowly eating away at the foundations until the entire building is on the verge of collapse.

Unless we kill them first.


67 posted on 03/17/2012 6:10:49 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Wow. Vthis guy is a master of the news cycle. Next we can talk about sodomy laws.

This guy is a loser.


68 posted on 03/17/2012 6:11:29 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

It must be Newt! If Santorum is the candidate, the election will be about his SERP. 2012 has got to be about Obama! the economy, STUPID! and not about morals!

I disagree with you. If people think it is ONLY the economy then the race would be only Newt and Romney. People care about social issues which is why Santorum is winning and getting the votes. People care about social issues. It is just that YOU DON’T care about social issues.


69 posted on 03/17/2012 6:11:50 AM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Excellent point, N Sojac. The problems come in when some ACLU types sue a local library for doing just that....establishing control over what filters are provided. Then the library, city, county, whatever has to come up with the bucks to fight this case which most of the time, they won’t have. These laws are passed to provide cover for cases like this.

There are no easy answers, but I also agree with your point about the proper role of Federal govt.


70 posted on 03/17/2012 6:12:53 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Seriously? MSNBC reports this like any sane, healthy, mentally stable person worries about his or her stash of porn being cut off. Good, honorable, decent people don't have anything to do with porn and if I were Rick Santorum I wouldn't be one bit ashamed of stating my anti-porn, anti-filth, anti-liberal positions on anything. I wouldn't want scumbags voting for me and Rick shouldn't want them voting for him either. Shout it out from the roof tops.... PORN and all other manner of unrighteousness is BAD and will be fought against at every opportunity.

As always this is just my humble opinion.

71 posted on 03/17/2012 6:13:31 AM PDT by Whats-wrong-with-the-truth (Romney... Just put the (D) behind your name and be done with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett; rellimpank; allen08gop; Notary Sojac

“realize that pornography is a weapon of the cultural and political marxists in their war against America.”


72 posted on 03/17/2012 6:13:31 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
Saint Rick needs to S T F U about these things. Stick w the economy stupid!

He can't. There is a reason Santorum is known primarily as a social values crusader. This is the stuff he most cares about and no matter how hard he or his advisers try, this sort of nonsense will come up again and again and again in a campaign. As as a general election nominee, Santorum would doom us to a landslide defeat that would take our House majority down with it.

Worse, Rick comes across as strident and judgmental and would alienate even many Republican voters who don't want anything to do with a candidate who wants to talk about why contraception is "not okay" and why we need to wage a war on porn. The guy is a walking electoral disaster waiting to happen.

People laugh now, but Pat Robertson actually did pretty well in the 1988 GOP primaries (one of his policy positions was to ban porn), came in second in Iowa and won some primary/caucus states. He'd have been an embarrassingly bad general election nominee and obviously would have doomed the GOP to defeat, but a certain segment of social conservatives voters (over a million before he dropped out) cast ballots for him anyway. In 2008 it was Mike Huckabee social conservatives gravitated to - not because Huckabee was particularly conservative when it came to government policy, but because they deemed him the most God-fearing candidate. Santorum is just another in the same mold and winning the same core of voters. He's only lasted this long because A)he was such an afterthought of a non-Romney candidate that most people ignored him for months, and B)our frontrunner, Romney, inspires pretty much nobody and is a terribly poor candidate himself who stands for pretty much nothing.

I want Newt to stay in till the end no matter what happens, mostly because I can't stand the thought of having to dig deep within myself and find a way to rally around either Mitt "the chameleon" Romney or Rick "lets talk about why contraception is not okay" Santorum.

73 posted on 03/17/2012 6:13:40 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Frankly, in the scheme of things on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (metaphysical importance), porn rates a .0005

I agree. Rick walked into a trap.

We have a bad economy, high unemployment, cities and states on the edge of bankruptcy, we're still dependent on foreign oil, gas is sky high, we have Islamic states falling to jihadi factions, illegal immigrants up the wazoo.

And if Rick wins the nomination, all the media will play about Rick leading up to November will be this porn sound bite.

74 posted on 03/17/2012 6:20:18 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
The Left is already banding together to do exactly what you say.

They are very keen, in knowing that Santorum will be all too easy to beat. There is a Daily KOS group that has been formed that go from open primary to open primary, with orders to vote for Santorum, to get him nominated.

This is an actual plan. Because they have so much they can destroy Santorum with, that they are holding all of it until he gets the nomination.

Santorum as our nominee, will be an utter disaster, especially after the Left hits the polls in record numbers and also votes in more Democrats for both houses.

75 posted on 03/17/2012 6:23:01 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Whats-wrong-with-the-truth
Good, honorable, decent people don't have anything to do with porn

And how are you so noble and pure that you are able to judge people this way?

As someone that has worked around IT for years let me tell you, almost everyone who says they don't look at internet porn is lying. That doesn't mean everyone views it, just far more people than you are allowing yourself to believe - and the vast majority are good and honorable folks.

Sorry, internet porn is not a pressing national problem.

76 posted on 03/17/2012 6:25:15 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Bobbisox
Dear Bobbisox,
You have just voiced one of my chief reasons for NOT supporting Santorum. I have hesitated to share this one publicly, though. You see, we are the parents of a medically fragile, severely disabled child. We walk in these shoes everyday and we know the toll that the stress and strain takes on a person, on a marriage, on a family.

I have so much more that I wish I could say about the issue but I will leave it at that. If a person has never walked in these shoes, they would never understand my opinions.

BTW, as much as I love Sarah Palin, I had the very same hesitations about her serving, too.

77 posted on 03/17/2012 6:27:27 AM PDT by georgiagirl_pam (STEP ONE: SECURE YOUR DOOR (gives you time to get your gun!) mysafedoor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

You should be happy he is bringing this up. You hate this conservative Christian Family Values candidate so anything he says to mess up should be a thrill for you. I am surprised that you are bashing him. You should be convincing him. I on the other hand am glad because most the voters don’t agree with your assessment as proof of his 10 state wins and popular vote.


78 posted on 03/17/2012 6:28:06 AM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
You forgot to mention the fact that inflation is starting to run away, after 3 years of “Quantitative Easing” and a deficit that went from 350 Billion in the last year of Bush, to over 1.3 Trillion in Obama’s second year.

This fact alone, is what will wreck this economy faster than all the other issues combined.

79 posted on 03/17/2012 6:28:58 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
The above section shows beyond the faintest shadow of a doubt that pornography users routinely engage in a wide range of violent and sadistic crimes, committed not only against themselves, but against other persons as well.

Really? Everybody who has ever read Playboy routinely goes out and rapes women in the night, after torturing them?

Dems would be ecstatic if some member of Rick's staff seriously came out with anything resembling this drivel.

80 posted on 03/17/2012 6:30:12 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; wagglebee
Observing the posts of freepers who think pornography, including the sexual abuse of children is NOT a concern helps me understand how deep the moral decay in this country is.

If this kind of rampant, crime-inducing, sexist, abusive issue is not important to address, then what is?

The amorality of some who call themselves conservatives is frightening, since part of conservatism IS morality.

81 posted on 03/17/2012 6:35:01 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Santorum's first step should be to make the pornographers all speak English.

This is clearly a top priority for the next president!

;-)

82 posted on 03/17/2012 6:37:25 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Put another way, while I would not be surprised if a majority of the people who are into sadism and rape are also into porn, this is NOT the same as declaring that watching porn CAUSES you to become addicted to rape and torture.


83 posted on 03/17/2012 6:38:10 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
“realize that pornography is a weapon of the cultural and political marxists in their war against America.”

THANK you for this!

It's alarming how many so-called conservatives are unaware that their own dismissal of moral issues is the result of the brainwashing of decades of communist propaganda in this country.

They have tried to destroy America by destroying its morals, and even among some conservatives, they have clearly succeeded.

84 posted on 03/17/2012 6:40:46 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Observing the posts of freepers who think pornography, including the sexual abuse of children is NOT a concern helps me understand how deep the moral decay in this country is.

Nobody here has been approving of child porn. Rick wasn't talking about child porn. The subject is porn involving consenting adults, and the point of many of us is that porn IS NOT the most pressing issue facing the US today, higher than illegal immigration, higher than the dangers of Islamic jihad, higher than the economy, etc.

85 posted on 03/17/2012 6:44:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I guess for me, these type of laws would be better held at the local level. There are quite a few laws on the books that I dont think rise to the level of government involvement.


86 posted on 03/17/2012 6:47:40 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Those activities arent what obscenity laws are for. Those are assault, coercion, kidnapping, and trafficking which are already illegal, and for good reason. They force an unwilling or unable to consent party into a harmful activity.


87 posted on 03/17/2012 6:52:15 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
This is an actual plan. Because they have so much they can destroy Santorum with, that they are holding all of it until he gets the nomination.

Yeah, I know the left is salivating at the opportunity to run against a candidate who wouldn't be able to shut about why he thinks contraception is "not okay" and why we need a war on internet porn. It would be a dream come true for the Democrats who are so desperate to avoid talking about the economy that they have already taken great pains to manufacture this phony "war on women" talking point. If the Democrats could sit down in a lab and create their most ideal opponent, Rick Santorum would pretty much be it.

88 posted on 03/17/2012 6:52:28 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Access to porn is far easier for kids today than cigarettes, drugs or liquor, and just as damaging on it’s own. What a generation, obese, couch potatoes playing video games, drinking Red Bull and watching porn.


89 posted on 03/17/2012 6:52:41 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think that if he meant “kiddie porn” he would have specified it up front. Every time Rick opens his mouth like this it hurts him.


90 posted on 03/17/2012 6:52:55 AM PDT by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
You totally miss the point.

Pornography is a symptom of a bigger disease, it's true, but at the current moment, we have far bigger fish to fry; Like an economy on the verge of a total collapse due to out of control government.

The issue of promiscuity, etc, is stopped by parents, in the home while the children are developed. You cannot stop it after the fact. And Government cannot legislate it, or control it. (And has no business doing so.)

Look back on history at every society that has ever developed. Morality is at the very beginning of every society that grows and becomes great, and immorality, moral depravity, etc, is always at the very end, in the declining stages of all great societies.

In order for it to turn around, that society has to fail completely, to be rebuilt from the ground up. It is the way it HAS to work and especially, how it always HAS worked. There is no other solution.

The fact that Santorum believes that government can fix it, is typical of his ignorance. And is therefor, every reason why he can not, and should not gain the highest office on Earth. Anyone that clueless and misguided, deserves to lose and more importantly, should lose.

91 posted on 03/17/2012 7:01:46 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Obeying the law and enforcing the laws should be a priority for ALL Americans, and Obama's lawlessness is a very 'pressing issue.'

As for the 'consenting adults,' the majority of women in porn are there because they were abused as girls, or prostituted.

As much as amoralists would like to disassociate pornography from sexual abuse, it's directly related, and therefore a concern.

92 posted on 03/17/2012 7:07:15 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows

If Rick thinks he can get porn off the internet, he should also set his scope on ridding it of spam, viruses, and snarky liberal comments on Yahoo News.


93 posted on 03/17/2012 7:11:24 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Porno is WORLD wide, but I am sure Santo will gladly try to legislate that as well. Since he firmly believes that there should be no separation of Church and State.


94 posted on 03/17/2012 7:13:41 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
In my 12+ years on Free Republic, I couldn't begin to count the number of posts I've seen that quote the communist goals for the United States as read into the Congressional Record back in 1963. Among these were:

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Rick understands that to "fundamentally transform" a nation, the left needs to first tear it down, or corrupt it beyond the point of viability so it can be remade in their own image.

95 posted on 03/17/2012 7:15:01 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

One can complain about the pornification of the culture (including grade schools teaching children about fisting) without it defining a candidate as a “respressive” “extremist”.

I am curious about the person who posed the question to Rick. Do THEY consider it to be the most important topic of the campaign since he has not been making public speeches about it? Or did the questioner seek to make Rick define his position as being “against porn” to define his candidacy?

It’s more of the same smoke and mirrors distraction from the Left.

Dennis Miller and Micheal Berry and other center-right talk radio hosts claim that Santorum’s stance on same sex marriage makes it difficult to support his candidacy. His position is the same one that this country held for over 200 years. His is not the extremist stance on that issue. Those who would vote against him the general election over same sex marriage are the ones who would seek to define the 2012 race JUST over gay marriage.

I’m leaning to Newt so I’m not even in the Santorum boat now. Just pointing out the tactic where the Left is trying to define candidates (yet Obama was never the pro-death, killing babies outside of the womb candidate).


96 posted on 03/17/2012 7:18:34 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Didn’t NBC have a tv program where the whole gist of it was to snare sexual predators online?

What makes them run with the story that somehow Rick’s position is different that their own entrapment scheme?


97 posted on 03/17/2012 7:21:48 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
As much as amoralists would like to disassociate pornography from sexual abuse, it's directly related, and therefore a concern.

That it should be A concern is not in question. The question is whether it's a good idea to have a Presidential campaign revolve around it as THE MAIN CONCERN. Because you know the MSM will make this issue be front and center for a Santorum candidacy if he wins the nomination.

98 posted on 03/17/2012 7:24:18 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Part of the President’s job is to enforce the law. If we have such laws on the books, then he should be enforcing them. And it would cut off a source of left-wing revenue, as you point out.


99 posted on 03/17/2012 7:24:42 AM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer
Access to porn is far easier for kids today than cigarettes, drugs or liquor, and just as damaging on it’s own.

Access to premarital sex appears to be far easier for kids today. And I think most of the child porn floating around today, by volume, is likely to be from teen girls taking nude pics of themselves to send to their boyfriends.

100 posted on 03/17/2012 7:28:13 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson