Skip to comments.Forgerygate: Ignoring Arpaio's report is a scandal in itself
Posted on 03/17/2012 6:02:48 PM PDT by SaveOurRepublicFromTyranny
click here to read article
>> “and quit his walks in the woods!” <<
Do you know what saguaro looks like? Or Palo Verde? That’s the woods around there!
Not really a good comparison. The colonists in 1774 were suffering orders-of-magnitude less intrusive and less tyrannical government than exists today.
In addition, the 1st revolution was unencumbered by the galaxy of information and information technologies in the hands of our current masters.
The next "battle at the bridge" will be short and historically misrepresented. Satellites spot the latter day colonists and the strike-force response both on the ground and in the air will be immediate.
Another difference is that the "strike force" will not be standard military this time. (Since that element is currently being diluted into moral and physical impotence.
In today's version of the U.S., the federal and local gestapo strike forces have been rehearsing and testing here for years.
I posted up on the other thread, where FReeper GOPJ posted a link to the Pravda story, that it is deeply embarrassing and humbling, that a story this big would run in Pravda before any of the American outlets would touch it.
It also means the neo-Stalinists have gotten so bad and so ubiquitous in America, that they can actually take the "freedom of information" away from us, and starve us of hugely determinative stories and matters of fact that we need to perform our own modest duties in a democratic republic.
Our media are fully engorged and engaged with a Communist conspiracy, and an actually Communist Russian newspaper is the one covering the American press's misfeasance.
I'm putting my money on a tragic Gila Monster encounter, or perhaps a violent allergic reaction to a Tarantula Hawk sting. Heck, I mean, people succumb to bites (gnaws would be more precise, I suppose) of Coral Snakes that wander into their homes all the time, right?
I heard Michael Medved, a couple of years ago, literally screaming at one persistent caller who refused to STFU when Medved had explained to him why "nobody cares" (by which Medved meant, "we can't make a judge care, we can't make the GOP caucus care, the RNC told me they don't cares", the "realists" don't care) -- so WTF are you to come in here and say you care, it's a big deal, and blah, blah, blah? He really gave him the treatment, and that's when I realized that Medved knows perfectly well -- they all do -- that this is a huge story, like "Momo" Giancana stealing the 1960 election for Dick Daley and JFK, but the mythos of American politics won't allow for some Bozo to come in and just steal the U.S. Presidency like he was a Nigerian con man working the rest-home lounge. Which, with press complicity and malfeasance, is about what happened.
Thank you for your work. I have provided the link to the GG piece and EFAD to concerned folks in my address book.
That is the pattern. But patterns are born to be interrupted, the most noteworthy moments in history.
I suspect that there are many who have thier hands in the pot, rino’s, rats the media and many who have to protect themselves and everyone around them no matter how criminal or sinister it may be. Commercial running where a women says there must be something said about Newt both sides hate him seems to say it all.
Thanks. If nothing else, it will serve as a mile post on the road to tyranny.
When our kids ask us how we lost our freedom, we can point to essays like Gangster Govt.
ABCNNBCBS are just the media mouthpieces for Gangster Government, Inc.
Obama is going to win in a Chicago Landslide, and neither the DOJ or GGTV will care to look into it.
Ok, so Medved yells at people and says no one (who matters) cares, but has he ever said he believes Obama is a usurper? No, but he believes in bigfoot.
Rush breaks through with a bit here and there on occasion. He did cover this WT story. He said there is evidence of a forged birth certificate and reiterated that it is a scandal that the story is not being covered widely.
I just thought you'd like to know that one of the people (not a FReeper, but a conservative I know personally) whom I emailed with the link you provided wrote back:
"I have his book at this very moment, on my coffee table."
Seems your mile post is posting some serious miles.
When did he say this?
I emailed rush several weeks ago, saying I was turning him off until he starts discussing the issue. Of course, I can’t stay away, but I don’t listen as much as before.
The biggest question that is just begging for an answer is, why would so crude a forgery be put forward as the real b/c?
It is not correct that the story is not being reperted widely.
The story is being suppressed, and those who bring it up derided as “birthers”.
Sometime in the week that the story was published. I don’t listen every day.