Skip to comments.
The Long Sunspot Cycle 23 Predicts a Significant Temperature Decrease in Cycle 24
Science Direct.Com ^
| February 2, 2012
| Jan-Erik Solheim, Kjell Stordahl, Ole Humlum
Posted on 03/17/2012 10:49:11 PM PDT by Paul Pierett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: ETL
As of Sept. 27, 2008, the sun had been blank, i.e., had no visible sunspots, on 200 days of the year. To find a year with more blank suns, you have to go back to 1954, three years before the launch of Sputnik, when the sun was blank 241 times. What are the odds, my birth date is 9-27-1954.
21
posted on
03/18/2012 7:36:02 AM PDT
by
justrepublican
(Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
To: GraceG
Yes we do - and it is thus Bush’s fault!
To: Alas Babylon!
You cannot create a model where we get warmer and Norway gets cooler due to the tilt of the Earth.It spins.
Unless it oscillates too, on a 24 hour cycle. Although I think we would notice that kind of wobble.
:)
To: Paul Pierett
But how can we be sure our SUVs and Bar-B-Qs etc aren’t causing the solar spots to vary, dangerously effecting our fragile environment?
24
posted on
03/18/2012 8:45:23 AM PDT
by
Blue Collar Christian
(Liberals vote the way they feel, conservatives vote the way they think. NRA <BCC><)
To: Paul Pierett; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
25
posted on
03/18/2012 4:04:13 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
