Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Admits Asking Media to Scrub Reports of Malia Obama's Mexican Vacation
NewsBusters ^ | March 20, 2012 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 03/20/2012 7:37:25 AM PDT by Zakeet

After it was reported Monday that Malia Obama was going to Mexico for spring break with 25 Secret Service agents, people began to notice that such reports were being scrubbed from the Internet.

Politico's Dylan Byers reported Tuesday this was done at the request of the White House:

The AFP page for the story now links to a story titled "Senegal music star Youssou Ndour hits campaign trail," as does the Yahoo page. The Huffington Post page now links directly back to the Huffington Post homepage. The Daily Mail, Telegraph, and Australian stories now lead to 404 error pages, reading "page not found."

In an update, Byers explained who was responsible for the scrubbing:

Kristina Schake, Communications Director to the First Lady, emails to confirm this was a White House effort:

From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest. We have reminded outlets of this request in order to protect the privacy and security of these girls.

Must be nice to command such an obedient media.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: achillwind; bhofascism; biasmeanslayoffs; censorship; democrats; drivebymedia; drivebys; enemedia; freepress; mainstreammedia; malia; mediabias; mediamalpractice; mexico; msm; msm4obama; obama; obamamaniamedia; revisionisthistory; staterunmedia; transparency; trysellingthetruth; vacation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-183 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Zakeet

If we could see the Obamas pay the bills out of their own funds it would be legitimate for the media to stay mum.


2 posted on 03/20/2012 7:40:19 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

It’s nice to be king.


3 posted on 03/20/2012 7:40:51 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Well, I guess we have to depend on the National Enquirer or other tabloids, to report on what Obama’s daughter is up to.

The media enthusiastically covered stories about the Bush daughters going out drinking and such, though admittedly the Bush daughters were older than Malia. But still, she’s what, 13 or 14? How many of you would let your young teen daughter go on spring break like that without you?


4 posted on 03/20/2012 7:41:00 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Executive Order #66666666 will require the news sources to comply or be shutdown.


5 posted on 03/20/2012 7:41:16 AM PDT by BipolarBob (When do the salmon return to Capistrano?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

True - here’s how ‘journalists’ talk when they think they’re only with each other...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBFOmUXR080


6 posted on 03/20/2012 7:41:16 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest.

FR has a long standing-policy of a hands-off approach to personal comments posted about the children of politicians. Too bad the Obamas will use their kids as political props when they see fit while simulataneously demanding privacy for them.

But FR will still adhere to our own standards even if the Obamas cannot and will not do so consistently.

7 posted on 03/20/2012 7:42:23 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sorry, but the children should be off limits for the reasons cited, i.e. privacy and their security. Anyone who would risk the lives of the Obama daughters by posting information that compromises their security deserves to be condemned. When it comes to protecting the children, politics be damned.


8 posted on 03/20/2012 7:43:51 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
. . . people began to notice that such reports were being scrubbed from the Internet.

Wouldn't it be simpler just to ask them to have all stories reviewed by the white house press office first in the future? < / sarcasm >

9 posted on 03/20/2012 7:44:25 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Photobucket
10 posted on 03/20/2012 7:44:25 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Probably justified concern, considering he gave Mexican Drug cartel the weapons to kill 35,000+ Mexicans.


11 posted on 03/20/2012 7:44:25 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I find the request for non-coverage by the WH to be a continuous joke on us and the MSM. In the request they state no coverage if “...there is no vital news interest.” Well this is a vital news interest: the US government just published a warning (to us peons) against traveling to Mexico during this Spring Break.
12 posted on 03/20/2012 7:46:34 AM PDT by RichyTea (To those offended - take off your blinders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Their security is compromised because idiotic parents send a 13 year old to the drug/gang/murder capital of the Western Hemisphere despite State Dept. warnings.


13 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:01 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sure, the kids can only be used when Obama needs them for fundraising pictures and vote-getting. They are his props, not the media’s. The taxpayers have no right to know where their money is going.

T-shirt: “Obama’s kid went on vacation to Mexico and all we got was a lousy bill.”


14 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:44 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

It was obama who started pulling his children in for “campaign” reasons, using them as props to try and bolster his ratings.


15 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:45 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Vital news interest? 25 Secret Service agents accompanying 13 13 year old exclusive private school students on a trip out of the country when 99% of American school children are lucky to eat pink goo in their lunches?

I think Americans are pretty generous and tolerant when it comes to providing security for the children of presidents and former presidents. But when the economy stinks and folks cannot afford to buy gas to go to work or to buy ground beef at the grocery store, then it becomes a news story when the president sends his daughter on a trip out of the country at an age when most children spend their vacations at home with their parents or on a trip to something close to home.


16 posted on 03/20/2012 7:48:51 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Gee, It didn’t seem to bother these pukes much when the left was saying disgusting things about Sarah’s kids.


17 posted on 03/20/2012 7:49:17 AM PDT by taillightchaser (Third party=four more years of marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
"Too bad the Obamas will use their kids as political props when they see fit while simulataneously demanding privacy for them."

Well said!

18 posted on 03/20/2012 7:49:29 AM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I imagine, that considering what he’s done to Mexicans, his family is not too welcome there:

H.RES.490 — Expressing no confidence in the Attorney General of the United States. (Introduced in House - IH)

Excerpt:
Whereas under Attorney General Holder’s watch, this operation was not set up to catch criminals and no proper monitoring of the guns being sold or transferred was undertaken;

Whereas Attorney General Holder further failed to inform or cooperate with Mexican authorities even though hundreds of weapons were being sent to Mexico;

Whereas currently, Mexico is under severe stress due to drug cartel wars;

Whereas credible sources estimate that over 35,000 Mexicans have been killed since 2007;

Whereas due to Attorney General Holder’s failure to properly control, monitor, or establish Operation Fast and Furious, it is likely Mexican nationals were killed or wounded by weapons sold through this scheme;

Whereas the carnage resulting from Operation Fast and Furious is not limited to Mexico;

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.+Res.+490:


19 posted on 03/20/2012 7:50:39 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

It is completely appropriate to maintain a hands off policy on Obama’s kids. Nevertheless, the adjunct story— the cost associated with the necessity of sending 25 agents for protection— in a time of belt-tightening for most Americans, is, in fact, newsworthy.


20 posted on 03/20/2012 7:52:02 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (How bad would an Obama II administration be, without the constraints of re-election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
If we could see the Obamas pay the bills out of their own funds it would be legitimate for the media to stay mum.

Exactly!! When I'm forced to pay the bills for a 13 yr old to go on a Mexican Vacation, for her and 20+ of her friends, plus 25 Security (something I can't afford to take my wife on, let alone any 'guests'); being told to STFU about it, does nothing but further infuriate me.

If the Obamas were to pay for this trip (minus security, I'll grant ANY sitting president security for himself, and his immedate family) - then I'd agree. Where she goes, what she does isn't any of my business. The Obamas can easily afford to do this - however, I cannot afford to do this. So, when this exhorbinate 'perk' is foistered upon the 51% of the population, who pays taxes; we have a RIGHT to know how our tax dollars are being spent. In this case, it's being spent entertaining a spoiled brat and 20 of her equally spoiled friends - on my dime.

21 posted on 03/20/2012 7:52:37 AM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The hell with that,that is news if the vacation is being paid for by the Tax payer.

Every jaunt the obama’s go on are probably on our dime.I sure want an accounting to prove otherwise.


22 posted on 03/20/2012 7:52:49 AM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Sorry, but the children should be off limits for the reasons cited, ...

Agreed. In this case however, the information published was in the public domain (and likely VERY well known in Mexico!) AND was in no way derogatory. This, there is no legitimate "Security" interest and her privacy has not been invaded.

The Great Scrub serves only one purpose - to expunge an embarrassing situation where the WH must explain why it is AGAIN necessary to have the taxpayer pay for such extravagances.

23 posted on 03/20/2012 7:53:33 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Exactly, so why on earth would you pick the place for a vacation??


24 posted on 03/20/2012 7:54:16 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All
Can this report be backed up with additional sources? Maybe should be considered as Breaking News.

The truth should be broadcast here if the lame-stream refuses to drive the points in this thread home (imho).

25 posted on 03/20/2012 7:54:44 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

What is not off-limits is who is paying the bill?

Obama has Air Force One, Wide Load has Air Force First lady and now malia has Air Force Malia?

That is not off-limits.
Who is paying the bill
25 Secret Service Agents is a great expense.plus the cost of an Air Force plane.
Armored cars there? Who knows?

If Obama is catering this affair -—fine. If we are paying the bill that is not off limits.


26 posted on 03/20/2012 7:55:03 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

First: I detest just about everything from Barry and his American hating wife and his administration.

Second: I do not trust the media, even FOX (that is a shame) to be our watchdog. They are big government lapdogs.

With that out of the way, I see no reason to place his children at additional risk via media coverage especially when their parents have so little regard for them to allow them to go to this drug war crazed hell hole.

What should happen, if my “Second” comment were not true, is the media could report fully what if any cost the US Taxpayers incurred for the royal family’s ill advised trip after they are safely home.


27 posted on 03/20/2012 7:56:31 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Agreed

+1

28 posted on 03/20/2012 7:56:38 AM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
(but that ignorant McCain cow is still fair game, right ? ;-)
29 posted on 03/20/2012 7:57:32 AM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Amen Brother.

This is BS.

This trip will cost the American taxpayers over a million dollars.


30 posted on 03/20/2012 7:57:39 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I R a Sister!


31 posted on 03/20/2012 7:58:33 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
EDIT: the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not being used by their parents as campaign props.
32 posted on 03/20/2012 7:58:58 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Nevertheless, the adjunct story— the cost associated with the necessity of sending 25 agents for protection ..

+1

33 posted on 03/20/2012 7:59:10 AM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Is it off limts to ask how much WE paid for a kid’s Spring break vacation with a dozen or so friends and a crew of USSS chaperones, or is the information about the cost of such a trip equally off-limts?


34 posted on 03/20/2012 7:59:41 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone

Well at least she will not be able to eat any fatty foods since her mommy said they were bad for children.

Oh wait, I forgot we were talking about one of mac dadddies chldren, that does apply to them.


35 posted on 03/20/2012 8:00:23 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Nevertheless, the adjunct story— the cost associated with the necessity of sending 25 agents for protection— in a time of belt-tightening for most Americans, is, in fact, newsworthy.

That part of the story is entirely in-play on FR and, given the Obama's two-faced demand for privacy for their kids while using them as campaign props, is probably why they wanted to have the larger story yanked in the first place, given all the bad press their high-cost-to-taxpayer vacations have earned them. It's a shame for Malia that her parent's lack of restraint and consideration for taxpayers has made this kind of scrutiny of a school trip come to pass, but it is what it is.

The FR mods are only pulling posts that make it personal about the kids, and pulling threads where such posts are just getting too pervasive. There is no Eric Holder batphone to the mod lounge tell us what to do, we had this standard back in the Clinton Admin years with posts about Chelsea.

36 posted on 03/20/2012 8:00:39 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
I R a Sister!

LOL

37 posted on 03/20/2012 8:00:42 AM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sooo, Obozo can pull his daughters out of the hat anytime he wants for political purposes, a la the Fluke phonecall, but can invoke “daughter’s privacy” when the repotage on the daughters doesn’t help him. Wonderful!


38 posted on 03/20/2012 8:01:10 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

“(minus security, I’ll grant ANY sitting president security for himself, and his immedate family)”

I disagree - especially when it comes to deliberately going to dangerous places and paying for the security to be stupid. The Presidency should come with sacrifices the family agrees to; it should not be the gorging smorgasbord of worldwide luxury travel the Obamas have made it.


39 posted on 03/20/2012 8:01:10 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
(but that ignorant McCain cow is still fair game, right ? ;-)

Heck, we'll provide the paintballs. Meghan McCain is an adult, albeit not acting like one.

40 posted on 03/20/2012 8:02:46 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Sorry if their security is so important don’t be shipping them off some place so insecure they need 29 body guards around them at all time.

Send them and their little friends up to Camp David. I hear they have a nice swimming pool and everything.

And it’s secure.


41 posted on 03/20/2012 8:03:32 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I wonder where Bo the Dog is vacationing?


42 posted on 03/20/2012 8:05:39 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

There is another reason this is an embarrassment to the Administration—something I pointed out in the FR post that was pulled. This shows extremely poor judgement on the part of both of the Obamas. I am SURE the director of the US Secret Service implored the President not to push ahead with this trip because of the security risks. The First Daughter is a tempting target for the cartels. I was shocked to read the number of SS agents as that is usually classified. Mexico is incredibly violent and the police and military are notoriously corrupt. No matter how much Malia complained, the Obamas should’ve put their foot down. I won’t be surprised if a book comes out in a few years confirming my suspicion that Obama was overriding the advice of the men and women tasked with protecting the lives of him and his family.


43 posted on 03/20/2012 8:05:58 AM PDT by Conservative Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
If we could see the Obamas pay the bills out of their own funds it would be legitimate for the media to stay mum.

Makes one think Congress has better things to do than stop zer0 from spending the people's money. All that expense equals zer0 paying or the taxpayer paying?

44 posted on 03/20/2012 8:06:02 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

not news worthy!

Well except the DHS warned Americans not to travel to Mexico...


45 posted on 03/20/2012 8:06:49 AM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I guess Drudge didn’t get the memo, he’s got several links and pictures right hear the top. That must mean the Romney campaign wants it there, or they forgot to order Drudge to play nice and take it down.


46 posted on 03/20/2012 8:07:22 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

DOES EVERYONE REMEMBER HOW THE BUSH TWINS WERE TREATED? HOW ABOUT THE PALIN KIDS?

Media asskissers make me sick.


47 posted on 03/20/2012 8:09:20 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

why would a story of communist usurper parents in the white house sending their 13 yr old daughter on spring break to mexico, a country off limits to Americans, not be newsworthy.


48 posted on 03/20/2012 8:09:30 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

I agree, if they were doing reasonable things, but taking 25 secret service agents to Mexico to baby sit a 13 year and her friends is Insane misuse of taxpayer resources. That is the story.

It is a huge story.


49 posted on 03/20/2012 8:10:36 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Anyone who would risk the lives of the Obama daughters by posting information that compromises their security deserves to be condemned.

Er, wouldn't that be Zero and Moochelle since they put her in this position?

50 posted on 03/20/2012 8:11:00 AM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson