Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

ABC News/Washington Post poll taken in January showed that most of those polled think that ObamaCare, if implemented, will cost jobs, hurt the economy, and cost more than projected.

The people know the truth.

1 posted on 03/20/2012 7:58:12 AM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mikey_1962

I wonder if the people know the following:

HOME SALES TAX

I thought you might find this interesting, — maybe even SICKENING!

The National Association of Realtors is all over this and working to get it repealed, — before it takes effect. But, I am very pleased we aren’t the only ones who know about this ploy to steal billions from unsuspecting homeowners. How many realtors do you think will vote Democratic in 2012?

Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That’s $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It’s in the health care bill, — and it goes into effect in 2013. Why 2013? Could it be so that it doesn’t come to light until after the 2012 elections? So, this is ‘change you can believe in’?

Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% sales tax.

If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation, — who often downsize their homes. Does this make your November, 2012 vote more important?

Oh, you weren’t aware that this was in the ObamaCare bill? Guess what; you aren’t alone! There are more than a few members of Congress that weren’t aware of it either.

You can check this out for yourself at:

http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home

I hope you forward this to every single person in your address book.

VOTERS NEED TO KNOW


2 posted on 03/20/2012 8:00:44 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962

It sounds more to me like a sign of desperation if they have decided to completely change their strategy a week before oral arguments...


3 posted on 03/20/2012 8:00:47 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962

The undocumented pRes_ _ent will lie, destroy further
the Constitution, and SCOTUS will love him for it.


4 posted on 03/20/2012 8:01:22 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
In a previous case, Gonzales v. Raich, Scalia noted in a separate opinion that the federal government could prevent people from growing their own medical marijuana as a “necessary and proper” way of carrying out the government’s broader power to criminalize drug usage.

I just KNEW that it would come down to that! That Opinion was one of the worst ever handed down.

6 posted on 03/20/2012 8:05:20 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
If ObamaCare is upheld, the Supremes suffer in the court of public opinion.

The Supreme Court is supposed to be beyond reproach from public opinion, which is why they are appointed for life.

7 posted on 03/20/2012 8:05:41 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962

“If ObamaCare is upheld, the Supremes suffer in the court of public opinion.”

This really will be a test for the Supreme Court. At a time when faith in public institutions is rapidly eroding, a decision to prop up ObamaCare by the Supreme Court pretty much would be a formal announcement that the Constitution which founded the nation is no longer in effect.


8 posted on 03/20/2012 8:09:33 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962

—...Scalia noted in a separate opinion that the federal government could prevent people from growing their own medical marijuana as a “necessary and proper” ...—

I almost laughed out loud at that one. Preventing someone from doing something and FORCING someone to do something are two completely different things. That is the problem with the mandate from the git-go.

I really can’t believe a single judge could side with Obama on this if they have a shred of respect for the spirit of the constitutions of the US.


9 posted on 03/20/2012 8:09:44 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
There is absolutely nothing from the Constitutional Convention, Federalist Papers, State ratifying Convention records to support this horrific and purposeful misuse of the necessary and proper clause.

Necessary laws implement enumerated powers. The entirety of Obamacare fails this test.

Proper laws are consistent with a government dedicated to liberty, our unalienable rights as guaranteed by the Ninth Amendment. Forcing citizens to enter into private contracts is a direct assault on what little remains of the Ninth.

12 posted on 03/20/2012 8:17:50 AM PDT by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
“In a previous case, Gonzales v. Raich, Scalia noted in a separate opinion that the federal government could prevent people from growing their own medical marijuana as a “necessary and proper” way of carrying out the government’s broader power to criminalize drug usage.”

Which is totally unrelated to this case, and isn't in any way similar.

Pot is illegal under Federal law, even medical pot, unless in DR proscribed FDA approved form. Private health Ins, or the total lack thereof, has never been illegal and isn't now.

13 posted on 03/20/2012 8:21:04 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
Such a claim, using Scalia’s own argument, is giving the White House the opening it needs to keep Scalia in line, remain consistent and force him to side with the administration on the matter.

Keep Scalia in line, hahahaha.

Justice Scalia ruled that the gummint could prevent people from growing an ILLEGAL PRODUCT because there was a law already on the books against it.

This in no way "forces Scalia to side with the administration" and if obama's legal team tries to go heavy handed with him, Scalia will show them why our people had such respect for the real Brotherhood.

16 posted on 03/20/2012 8:26:01 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorists savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and other Anti-Federalists saw this coming: I hope our courts will never countenance the sweeping pretensions which have been set up under the words “general defence and public welfare”. These words only express the motives which induced the Convention to give to the ordinary legislature certain specified powers which they enumerate, and which they thought might be trusted to the ordinary legislature, and not to give them the unspecified also; or why any specification? They could not be so awkward in language as to mean, as we say, “all and some”. And should this construction prevail, all limits to the Federal Government are done away. This opinion, formed on the first rise of the question, I have never seen reason to change, whether in or out of power; but, on the contrary, find it strengthened and confirmed by five and twenty years of additional reflection and experience: and any countenance given to it by any regular organ of the government, I should consider more ominous than anything which has yet occurred. ~ Thomas Jefferson; letter to Spencer Roane, 1815.
29 posted on 03/20/2012 9:34:46 AM PDT by Spartan79 (I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
“ABC News/Washington Post poll taken in January showed that most of those polled think that ObamaCare, if implemented, will cost jobs, hurt the economy, and cost more than projected.” But most democrats are still willing to support the bill to show their support for Obama.
31 posted on 03/20/2012 9:46:03 AM PDT by mikemoose (Pray for the Unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962

Only Fox News covered this reality. Only the Tea Party raised h e double toothpicks about it.


48 posted on 03/20/2012 2:48:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson