Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN And Fox Project Romney Wins Illinois
CNN and Fox | March 20, 2012

Posted on 03/20/2012 5:51:54 PM PDT by Pinkbell

No link yet. I'm just seeing it on CNN. Reuters said Fox called it as well.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; 2012swingstates; 2sides4romney; 3sides4romney; 4sides4romney; allsides4romney; backstabberromney; benedictromney; canttrustromney; combine4romney; crookcounty; crybabysantorum; elites; getoutnewt; gungrabbers4romney; il2012; ilcombine; illinois; kenyanbornmuzzie; mitt4establishment; mitt4romney; mittromney; newt4romney; newtgetout; newtgingrich; newtsplittingthevote; ricksantorum; romney; romney4globalwarming; romney4mccain; romney4romney; romneyantiteaparty; romneydirtytrick; romneytherino; ruinerromney; santorum; santorum4romney; santorumtoast; slickwillard; socializedmedicine; stenchofromney; tokyoromney; untrustworthyromney; verminromney; weakfrontrunner; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-277 next last
To: Cato in PA

Turnout for Tuesday’s Illinois primary in Chicago was a meager 24 percent, officials said.

It was the lowest turnout for a presidential primary in the past 70 years.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/03/20/voter-turnout-extremely-low-for-illinois-primary/


101 posted on 03/20/2012 7:00:54 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

My bad.

I SHOULD have said Romney is a LIBERAL Republican, and so is “reach-across-the-aisle, but they don’t reach back” John McCain.

Bush 43, was slightly right of moderate, and did a lot for the pro-life movement.


102 posted on 03/20/2012 7:02:15 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; All; Kenny; AmericanInTokyo; darrellmaurina
"Going to be a lot of poor losers after tonight."

You're right Hinckley.

To all, please forgive my antagonistic comments. I know the pain of seeing a candidate lose that you really relate to...from 1964 onward. It really, really sucks.

It hurts and it's bewildering.

But I have to disagree, most are not poor losers. Most Freepers are genuine winners.

There's only two folks I have ever held a grudge against on FR...even in the heated a vicious battles over NEARLY 14years here.

Santorum supporters: You have my condolences.

I'll be back tomorrow to fight. Tonight you'll get my respect and comfort.

For, I can remember falling to the floor in 1976, weeping.

103 posted on 03/20/2012 7:02:24 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

No, it’s not over yet.

I just don’t like to lose, especially to a piece of garbage like Mitt Trotsky.

He stands for nothing.


104 posted on 03/20/2012 7:05:14 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (Mitt Trotsky and his wingman RuPaul should return to Tehran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Like I said above. there will be a lot of poor losers here tonight. Pay them no mind. They will blow themselves out after awhile.
105 posted on 03/20/2012 7:05:59 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Thanks for the kind thoughts, but my dislike and disgust for bottom feeder Mitt Romney to keep me warm:)


106 posted on 03/20/2012 7:07:45 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
"That 'anybody but Santorum' would certainly include Romney now wouldn't it. "

Yes, it does.

107 posted on 03/20/2012 7:09:18 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sthguard

There are two ways to win idiots’ votes.


Idiots can’t think, won’t think and .... ohhhh shiney!

The biggest problem with Newt - who I support wholeheartedly - is he doesn’t speak in soundbites. He EXPLAINS. Most people do not want to learn or listen. His video on energy is totally amazing - but it is 30 minutes, not 30 seconds.
The country that put a man on the moon. That basically invented and forced through the technological revolution. And it seems that most of the voters can’t focus for more than ten seconds.

Newt never stood a chance in Illinois, I don’t think any Newt supporter thought that. I really wish Sen. Santorum had done much better. This was not the news I was hoping to wake up to today (yeah, I work odd hours).


108 posted on 03/20/2012 7:09:39 PM PDT by EnglishCon (Gingrich/Santorum 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Let it be known that Cato in PA will never, under any circumstances, vote for Mitt Romney.

Fine, we'll put you down as "undecided."

109 posted on 03/20/2012 7:09:57 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“Your biggest enemies are totalitarian rat bastard psychopaths like Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, and Obama and Co, who will literally kill you if they get a chance. I don’t mean politically. I mean they intend to kill you, and your family. They have said as much off the record.

Whining about Romney’s faux conservatism is a high class problem compared to physical survival.”

You are correct.


110 posted on 03/20/2012 7:10:19 PM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I will not vote for Romney if he is the nominee.

I will only vote for Romney IF he is the nominee.

The prime directive is to defeat Barack Obama and ALL Democrats in November.

And I do mean ALL Democrats. The Democrats are truly anti-American and are the enemies fo freedom; completely co-opted by Marxists and hard core leftists, as it is actively engaged on multiple fronts to destroy this nation.

Now, I am listening to my man Newt Gingrich on Fox explaining why we have to defeat Obama. I listen to this man and know he has such wisdom and knowledge, and can not understand how, once again, I find myself in the minority of Americans, and the minority of Republicans who understand how to recognize true leadership.

But if Romney is the nominee I WILL vote for him, because to allow Barack Obama and his detestable, corrupt Administration to remain in power over me and my family one more day after January 20, 2013 at noon is UNTHINKABLE>

You and I and other longtime Freepers know what is at stake in this election. It is like 1860 and 1980--the effects will have ramifications for decades to come, and will determine even if there is an America in the future.

But I will tell you this--it will be the last time I vote Republican in a Presidential race. Because, win or lose, we need to ffinally throw off the elephant and create a Conservative political party after this election. The RINOs will have their last stand. If they saddle us with Willard and they win, at least we will be done with Obama. If they saddle us with Willard and we lose, the GOP has breathed their last and will go the way of the Whigs.

And our country will be in a fight for its very existence, and I do not say that lightly. I am a student of history and I see what is coming, and it is not pretty.

We will do our duty to America and to the GOP once last time in either case. But to not vote--that is not thinkable or rational, given the hour of peril we face.

111 posted on 03/20/2012 7:11:08 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Actually, it started with Perry. Myself and his other supporters along with the Governor were called the worst, most obnoxious names by a gang of trolls who were given no limits on this forum. A number of them were Cain supporters who switched to Gingrich or just disappeared once Perry dropped out.

And Perry was a full-fledged conservative, head and shoulders above the current ones.


112 posted on 03/20/2012 7:12:29 PM PDT by magritte (Gladys Knight: Mormon Siren?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Don’t make Cato come over there! :P

Cato will now cease talking in the third person.


113 posted on 03/20/2012 7:13:02 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The majority of conservatives who have not warmed up to Santorum is due to lack of trust in his judgement after having endorsed Mitt Romney in the last Presidential primary.

To those Newt supporters they see a a compromiser rather than a fighter of principles when they see Santorum you know "well, we didn't get what we really wanted but at least we got SOMETHING done".

So, if anybody is in hiding as a Romney supporter but masking as a supporter of somebody else that Romney supporter would most likely be claiming to support Santorum and NOT Newt Gingrich.

Santorum never had a chance. He should have stepped down long ago and let Newt tackle Mitt Romney. But he didn't. We can look for Santorum to be endorsing Mitt Romney AGAIN sometime soon, I suppose. many believe that was his plan all along.

Your theory just does not hold water.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1KRP6-f7OY

114 posted on 03/20/2012 7:16:10 PM PDT by tsowellfan (Don't blame me. I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon

Yes, you’re right about Illinois— I lived there for half of my life, and thinking conservatives are few and far between. The university crowd might respect Newt’s methods and ideas, but of course they are terrified to vote against Obama.


115 posted on 03/20/2012 7:17:24 PM PDT by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: exit82

There is a strategy being developed right now should the GOP lose the House and Senate, and the Presidency this year. It is called the Filibusterer. We will tie up all legislation with it. Then we will have a second Tea Party revolution in 2014 and nominate our President in 2016.


116 posted on 03/20/2012 7:17:53 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Obama wants to destroy this country, kill it, plow it under and salt the earth. At worst, Romney wants to what--use it to get richer? I don't see Romney bent on creating a socialist totalitarian state. I'll take my chances with Romney thanks.
117 posted on 03/20/2012 7:17:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan; AmericanInTokyo
"Santorum never had a chance. He should have stepped down long ago and let Newt tackle Mitt Romney. But he didn't. We can look for Santorum to be endorsing Mitt Romney AGAIN sometime soon, I suppose. many believe that was his plan all along.

If Romney wins the nomination every prominent Republican will announce their support of him...INCLUDING Palin...on the floor of the convention in Tampa.

118 posted on 03/20/2012 7:20:48 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Don’t look at me! I voted for Santorum in 2012; Fred Thompson in 2008; and Alan Keyes against Barack Obama.

Sigh. Not enough people agree with me.


119 posted on 03/20/2012 7:21:19 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner (Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magritte

For the most part, I held my tongue against Bachmann, Perry, even Gingrich, and was a Cain supporter and went to Santorum. Might be a few times I unloaded on Newt Gingrich but never any carpet bombing, or incessant, PSYCHOTIC showing up on Newt thread after Newt thread being an agent provocateur to distrupt over there. I respect them and leave them alone. Newt is not the worst guy in the world and stands as my second choice in this race to stop Romney. My number one problem in this 2012 GOP season, open source, no hidden agenda or allegiences here or playing games or astro-turfing, has ALWAYS BEEN Mitt Romney, along with Obama of course. I have made every effort to target fire where it should be targeted, as a conservative. Hope I have been true to those precepts and values.


120 posted on 03/20/2012 7:21:45 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (If Free Republic morphs into a supportive site for Romney, I'll conclude my 13 year participation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
CNN And Fox Project Romney Wins Illinois

RND and FR Project Loss fo Conservatives

121 posted on 03/20/2012 7:22:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I believe in Cap and Trade. I know, I know... Cap spending and trade Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
LOL! Cheers. Tomorrow is another day, eh?
122 posted on 03/20/2012 7:23:37 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
I don't see Romney bent on creating a socialist totalitarian state.

Judging by his time in MA he's apparently is not entirely uncomfortable with it, either.

All that aside, I think Obama has been planning on facing Willard all along - IMO he's the only GOP candidate Obama is certain he can beat. So we wind up with the megalomaniac anyway.

123 posted on 03/20/2012 7:24:34 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: exit82

“The prime directive is to defeat Barack Obama and ALL Democrats in November.”

Winnah winnah chicken dinnah! Romney was not in my top five choices, but like it or not, he is the man now.

This race is no longer about any of us here. It is about getting 10% of the squishy, unknowing 30% in the middle to change their vote this time. Like it or not, Mitt’s blandness will be an asset as he avoids the media’s scary republican label.

He may not execute “Operation Rollback Spending” like Paul Ryan or Sarah Palin would, but at least he will end Obama’s assault on our nation.


124 posted on 03/20/2012 7:28:02 PM PDT by redlegplanner ( No Representation without Taxation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Myself and his other supporters along with the Governor were called the worst, most obnoxious names by a gang of trolls who were given no limits on this forum.

And I was with you. Perry was my favorite and it was hard to watch the degrading demeaning treatment he got on this board. As you said, "by a gang of trolls who were given no limits on this forum".

I don't know where we go from here but I pray for our future that we're able to support and build up our candidates. Too much at stake to not give it our all.

125 posted on 03/20/2012 7:29:40 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks; All
"IDK — but the media and liberal
onslaught machine hasn’t even started yet.
Wait until it’s 24/7 assault on Romney —"


126 posted on 03/20/2012 7:30:26 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If Romney wins the nomination every prominent Republican will announce their support of him...INCLUDING Palin...on the floor of the convention in Tampa

That may be true. But you're talking about a general election between the Republican and Barack Obama. Santorum's endorsement of Mitt Romney came during the primary. If he did not think that Romney was a "conservative" by his own standards there was no need to endorse him or McCain when he did.

Nobody in their right mind actually believes Santorum's sudden acknowledgment that Mitt Romney is a moderate Republican after he once claimed Romney was a "real conservative". It just looks fake when he talks about Romney like that now. It's true Romney is a liberal republican. It's not true that Santorum really believes it. Santorum wants to be President.

127 posted on 03/20/2012 7:33:10 PM PDT by tsowellfan (Don't blame me. I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Some attacked him with such fervor that it’s as if he did something personal to them.

He did. He’s been living a fairly moral life. Some people find that to be offensive.


128 posted on 03/20/2012 7:33:35 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

You need to put things in context.

In a race between Mitt Romney and John McCain for the 2008 GOP Nomination, who would you call the “true conservative” of that race after it became clear it was a two man race?


129 posted on 03/20/2012 7:35:45 PM PDT by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Because Santorum is an idiot and Gingrich is not.

Only an idiot or a crook would support carbon credits.


130 posted on 03/20/2012 7:36:53 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sthguard

It is a crying shame.

I have said before and will again, Senator Santorum is a good man. Speaker Gingrich is not (to be blunt) but he has the answers. No waffling, or turning things back on his opponents - the guy actually has a plan that will work.

I have almost given up on the Speaker getting the nomination. Not quite, I still hope he does and will work for him all in until he drops out, but the chances are slim now.

What I want now is a candidate - or team - that will actually use his policy suggestions.

Sorry for being down, but this news is not exactly good from where I am sitting. We know plastic, center left, flipflopping politicians here. Had them for decades.


131 posted on 03/20/2012 7:37:53 PM PDT by EnglishCon (Gingrich/Santorum 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
We can look for Santorum to be endorsing Mitt Romney AGAIN sometime soon, I suppose. many believe that was his plan all along.

To be fair, assuming Romney wins the nomination, Newt will endorse Mitt too. With the exception of Paul and very few others, they will all back him. Newt, Santorum, Perry, Palin, etc, etc, will all endorse, support and actively campaign for Romney. Don't fool yourself into thinking otherwise.

To those Newt supporters they see a a compromiser rather than a fighter of principles when they see Santorum you know "well, we didn't get what we really wanted but at least we got SOMETHING done"

I just see Santorum as a terrible nominee because I think he'd lose a general election in a landslide so large it would take our House majority down with it. Romney sucks, but Rick would lose even worse. Is Rick a better conservative than Mitt? I certainly think so. Unfortunately, he would not be a better general election candidate. Santorum simply can't avoid being baited over and over and over on the social issues. By the time the media is done with him (and because Santorum is terribly undisciplined), you'd think the election was about whether to ban rubbers and Victoria's Secret catalogue's.

132 posted on 03/20/2012 7:37:53 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: parksstp
In a race between Mitt Romney and John McCain for the 2008 GOP Nomination, who would you call the “true conservative” of that race after it became clear it was a two man race?

If I were a politician who stands on principles I would not have endorsed either. It was a primary and no endorsement required. And if I did make the stupid decision to endorse Mitt Romney I would have not gone as far as claim he is a "real conservative".

I would not have endorsed any of them.

133 posted on 03/20/2012 7:40:03 PM PDT by tsowellfan (Don't blame me. I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

The GOP under the current nominating rules will never be able to elect a conservative...again.

A conservative can still win if there is only one in the race from the beginning. Most moronic voters think this is a horse race and it’s your job to vote for the one who will win even if you don’t like him.


134 posted on 03/20/2012 7:40:18 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Is anybody really surprised that the same morons who elected that scumbag faggot Mark Kirk to the Senate would vote for a lying, unprincipled liberal like Mittens?


135 posted on 03/20/2012 7:41:48 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Currently the YOUTH VOTE is up for grabs. Bammy had it. He blew it. They haven’t had employment for the last four years.

They are NOT looking for Leftwingtard solutions, and that’s all Romney has to offer.

You’re right about the youth. On top of employment, they’re thinking that the individual mandate is a way to force the youth to pay the old folks medical bills.


136 posted on 03/20/2012 7:43:43 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
So, now what? Do you vote for a third-party candidate? Abstain from voting for President? Or do you vote for the only person who can remove Obama from the Oval Office?


137 posted on 03/20/2012 7:45:25 PM PDT by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Krauthammer just said that he believes the ticket will be Romney/Rubio.

RR...If there's a subliminal there, it ain't Ronald Reagan!

Man hasn't a silver ghost of a chance of winning anyhow.

138 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:13 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
I just see Santorum as a terrible nominee because I think he'd lose a general election in a landslide so large it would take our House majority down with it. Romney sucks, but Rick would lose even worse.

That's the second reason why I never jumped on the Santorum wagon.

The first was that he thinks Romney is a real conservative.

Yes, perhaps Newt, Palin and all the others will end up endorsing Romney in the end but the end is when it's ONE Republican vs Barack Obama and not one republican against another republican.

If Santorum stepped down tonight I still suspect that he would endorse Mitt Romney over Newt Gingrich again calling Mitt the "real conservative". He did it before and he'd do it again. When asked about it Santorum would brush it off as "oh... that's just politics".

That's why many do not trust Santorum's judgment.

139 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:29 PM PDT by tsowellfan (Don't blame me. I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

ok, put yourself in Santorum’s shoes for a minute:

You are serving in the US Senate, with John McCain. You’ve gotten to witness first hand McCain’s actions, leadership, etc (McCain/Feingold, Gang of 14, McCain/Kennedy, Opposing the Bush Tax Cuts). You’ve really, really, grown to dislike McCain over your tenure in the Senate and agree with Thad Cochrane when he says “the thought of him being President sends shivers up my spine”.

Now witnessing that first hand, are you going to sit by and let McCain grab the nomination or are you going to do something about it.

That’s what and why Santorum did and said what he did in 2008.


140 posted on 03/20/2012 7:47:43 PM PDT by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

And Newt proves once again how he will win.He didnt even beat Ron Paul.The Newtereds are delusional.


141 posted on 03/20/2012 7:51:52 PM PDT by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: parksstp
Now witnessing that first hand, are you going to sit by and let McCain grab the nomination or are you going to do something about it.

I would not have endorsed neither McCain nor Romney.

Endorsements have consequences... as we can see today.

142 posted on 03/20/2012 7:52:33 PM PDT by tsowellfan (Don't blame me. I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
So true. Sort of surprised the moderator allowed the continual negative toxic comments from these guys, horrible. Probably did their share of damage on various boards. People can only take so much of that crap and they give up.

Please tell me I'm misunderstanding, and you don't seriously think that "toxic" comments on FR or any other internet forum had anything to do with Romney winning Illinois.

143 posted on 03/20/2012 7:52:56 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Yep. Love the cartoon.


144 posted on 03/20/2012 7:56:36 PM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
Please tell me I'm misunderstanding, and you don't seriously think that "toxic" comments on FR or any other internet forum had anything to do with Romney winning Illinois.

I think the unrelenting barrage of garbage heaped upon Perry, Bachman, and Santorum certainly took its toll. And it wasn't just here, this lack of civility is an epidemic. Guess it's like a driver flipping off the other guy or tailgating, some sort of anonymity on the web, brings out the worst in some people.

145 posted on 03/20/2012 7:59:53 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
So, now what?

Since third parties don't win, we need to make the GOP the third party.

146 posted on 03/20/2012 8:02:34 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Because sweater vest idiot man is a douchebag degenerate lawyer for "pro" wrestlers, who supported MYTH in 2008 and Arlen Specter, who switched parties and cast the deciding vote for Obamacare? The megalomaniac loser from PA who lost his reelection to the Senate by 18% and uses Romney supporter Foster Friess money to stay in the race and take out Gingrich?? The only solution to this problem is annihilation of the blue blood country clubbers at the RNC and their creepy pulled back wives. The GOP must die.

That's a tad harsh but I basically agree with every word of it, especially those last 4.

147 posted on 03/20/2012 8:05:42 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Turnout for Tuesday’s Illinois primary in Chicago was a meager 24 percent, ........officials said..... It was the lowest turnout for a presidential primary in the past 70 years.

Looks like nobody else wanted to vote for any of them either with only 24% coming out.


148 posted on 03/20/2012 8:06:17 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
And suppose you just tell me here, in open forum, in front of everyone here, how Speaker Newt Gingrich plans to even get his name in nomination at the Convention, when at this time, he is prevented from GOP Convention Rules (established in 2008) from doing it? What is the point in continuing? And (the established fact) that both he and Ron Paul both lack the ability to be put into nomination in Tampa at this point.

The only two GOP candidates at this stage remaining [as of tonight, 20 March 2012 ] who have won enough won primary/caucus states to meet the threshold of having their names actually put into nomination in Tampa so they can be voted for by the delegates assembled are ROMNEY and SANTORUM?

Which states are it that Gingrich will be picking up in the next few weeks to get to that threshold? What about Louisiana where Santorum has a 9 to 10% lead over his challengers (next state up on the docket), and even there, Romney is appearing ahead of Gingrich?

Tell me who the "spoiler" is on this, at the midway point to the nomination.

Conclusion. It is time for Gingrich to leave the race, but if it takes a beating in Louisana then, so be it. Spite against Romney (as disgusting and deserving as Romney is of this), cannot propel the Speaker ad infinitum, as his fundraising imploded from February and March will probably show the same.

No we need a combined conservative effort here and no further splitting of this vote.

RNC RULE NO. 40, ELIGIBILITY FOR NAME PLACED INTO NOMINATION


149 posted on 03/20/2012 8:16:34 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (If Free Republic morphs into a supportive site for Romney, I'll conclude my 13 year participation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: exit82
I am a student of history and I see what is coming, and it is not pretty.

The birth of our nation was not pretty. Birth never is. We're going to need a whole other birthing to replicate what has been lost.

150 posted on 03/20/2012 8:21:10 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson