Skip to comments.Sandra Fluke: Politicians should be required to pass pro-woman litmus test to get elected
Posted on 03/21/2012 7:18:59 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Sandra Fluke: Politicians should be required to pass pro-woman litmus test to get elected By Michelle Fields -- The Daily Caller 12:09 AM 03/21/2012 ADVERTISEMENT
Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke said on Tuesday that candidates running for office should have to pass a pro-woman litmus test in order to get elected.
Fluke, an advocate for the Obama administrations plan to force health insurers to cover birth control, was on Capitol Hill for a forum on Opportunities and Challenges for a New Generation of Women, in celebration of Womens History Month.
There should be a litmus test that they be pro-women so our votes have to include that requirement at least, Fluke said. And it should be a litmus test that applies to male candidates as well.
She also spoke about the possibility of running for office in the future:
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Right after they read the Constitution.
“Who put her up to this?”
I don’t know, but it sounds as though we’ll be listening to the slut for a long time. She’s trying to extend her 5 minutes of fame.
Getting really tired of Fluke acting like she speaks for me.
And after we start the pro-women litmus test, we should start a pro-minority litmus test, to make sure that any cannidate for public office is acceptable to minorities. And then we should vette them with the pro-homo litmus test to make sure they are ok with the homosexual crowd. And then we should vette them with the pro-communist litmus test.
Do I really need the /sarc tag?
Shut the Fluke up!!!
Ugh... go away, Fluke.
What’s next, running for congress?
Next she will be running for a Senate seat..
Who didn't see THAT coming? She was being groomed for a while. From bedroom-slut to political-slut.
She is not going away folks, the Obamas are desperate to distract us from 5.00 gas, 15% unemployment, and Michelle Obama..
She seems to miss the point that such issues are PRECISELY what elections are about. They want to mandate that they win.
Guys, Fluck was *always* running for office. The hearing was crafted by liberals and communists, to groom younger liberals and communists for office.
I’m pro-woman. I don’t like killing them before they are born.
Will someone tell our knowledge challenged women’s champion that such system already exists. It’s called either a candidate’s voting record or public policy positions. A woman can look at them and decide for herself. Or does Ms. Fluke deem women to dumb and ill prepared for such a task, and wants to form a committee to ban candidates who in their view are anti women, thus preventing poor dumb women voters from being hoodwinked by anti women candidates.
It may be sarcasm to you and me.
But to the Dims, it sounds like a plan
A pro-Constitution litmus test would be preferable: includes both men and women equally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.