Skip to comments.Ron Paul Embraces Iran, Trutherism and Blame-America [Wild Shrimp Friskies for Kitteh's lunch]
Posted on 03/21/2012 8:35:14 AM PDT by Freedom Worship WordEdited on 03/21/2012 9:00:37 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I want every talk radio host, rightwing pundit and Republican voter who thinks for one second that Ron Paul is an actual conservative to watch this video, digest it and understand what a joke this guy really is.
[mod note - what was actually posted was a Paultard screed that this newb posted as soon as he was no longer being reviewed. We have changed the content to fit the idiot]
Ron Paul is the only real nutbase in this GOP primary.
IBTZ - Paulbot.
Go away Paul troll
The Problem as I see it with Romney is that he will be such a mediocre President that even if he does win he will be so middle of the road as to not upset the apple cart that the economy will not bloom and then in 4 years it will assure that the democrats take back power on the whole meme that the economy didnt recover.
Not to mention any GOP president is going to be so damned hated no matter how moderate they are. Mittens will get so damned gun shy that he will be ineffective and the MSM and the Democrat controlled media will smell blood and keep attacking him even as he retreats and this will paralyze him to what needs to be done to restore the economy and defuse all of Obamas horrible regulatory actions.
Newt is going to be hated like hell anyways and HE KNOWS THAT, but he also knows that he will have the people who put him there behind even if the Media doesnt paint it that way every night at 5:00pm.
So therefore, Newt (who thrives on antagonism instead of flinching from it) will take the bold measures to recover the economy despite being thrashed every night on the MSM news channels. In Four years the MSM will be flabbergasted like their were on election night in 1984, because the man on the street will notice the economy improvement.
Mitt is a Flincher, Newt is a Clincher
Definition of a Clincher:
a decisive fact, argument, act, or remark
Definition of a Flincher:
to withdraw or shrink from or as if from pain
We are so SOL if Either Mittens gets in or Barry gets a second term.
Mittens would only slow things down and then in four years the GOP would be blamed so much but with little to show we would still be in an economic malaise the likes of Carters worst dreams. This would GUARANTEE a Democrat Victory over the house the senate and even the presidency in 2016. They would not be pulling any punches as they would run someone that would make Obama look like a middle of the road moderate. Because they know they would have a very good chance of winning. Not to mention the class warfare game that could be played to Bolshevik conclusion during that election if we get Romney and mediocre performance out of him which is very much likely.
Of course Obama winning would be a very much nothing to lose second term that would see him likely either completely destroying the economy so badly that they play the game of Destroy and Support in that they would destroy the economy and then support the people as the great savior thus ensuring either Glorious Revolution or the mass construction project of making millions more so dependent that they will have a permanent grip on power that would only come undone with Blood sweat and tears, but mostly Blood and Tears.
ABO and ABR, because we really need Newt or maybe Santorum if we get desperate, heck I would even take, heaven forbid (I cant believe I am saying this), Ron Paul over Romney for the reasons above.
So I repeat once more: Newt is the Clincher, and Mitt is the Flincher.
So you are a recent joinee just to prove you are a Paul-tard???
Why doesn’t Ron Paul just endorse Mitt Romney and get it over with. I mean I 100 percent believe he will release his delegates to Romney and get Romney to 1140 anyway. Just do it Paul and stop wasting time you creep.
Newt is the only candidate that knows how the game is played at the top level. Period. He can build a consensus on the important issues, and if not, has no problem presenting the argument, in simple english, to the American public to force the issue. IMHO he can turn this mess around.
It's a coin toss who would do more damage, mit or hussein. And in all probability the only accomplishment Rick would have is ridding us of hussein. Which is better than nothing.
dang. I missed it.
Great comment, great insight, should be a vanity post.
Just because drugs were legalized
doesn't mean I would take them.
Ron Paul doesn’t always tell you what you want to hear, but he does tell the truth. And that’s better than any other candidate out there. Think about it.