Skip to comments.Will the Real "Prostitute" Stand Up? (NOW doesn't think million bucks should be returned to Maher)
Posted on 03/21/2012 1:55:48 PM PDT by doug from upland
(Video is at the link)
Listening to the Democrats, you would think Rush Limbaugh had committed a war crime. His use of the terms prostitute and slut that he offered as possible descriptors of leftist agitator Sandra Fluke, and for which he subsequently apologized has been the rallying cry of every lefty feminist in sight, but Democrats generally as they seek to make as many miles on this as they can. The problem is that contrary to the shrill refrain, its not having quite the effect the Democrats had hoped, and what seems to be happening is that there has been a backlash against sponsors who withdrew advertising from Limbaughs show. This flies in the face of all weve been told about this episode by the mainstream media, but it also offers a little insight as to who the American people see as the real prostitute, as the double-standard in the media has become apparent with such leftists as Bill Maher getting a pass from certain politicians and political groups.
National Organization for Women(NOW) President Terry ONeill was asked whether she thought the Obama SuperPAC that received a million dollars from the so-called comic Bill Maher ought to return the money on the basis of what he has said about a number of prominent conservative women, including Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Her answer is only surprising to those who are naive about the motives of the NOW gang. Watch the video:
Ms. ONeill expresses a smarmy contempt for the question, noting that she wants Barack Obama elected, thus rejecting the idea that the money ought to be returned to Maher. I would never make the mistake of telling you that ONeill is a prostitute or a slut, but it is interesting to see how her support of women is conditional and quite obviously for sale.
This brings me to the real object of my question. You see, while President Obama doesnt technically control the SuperPAC that accepted Bill Mahers million dollars, he does exercise at least theoretical moral authority. He could urge the money be returned if he was as serious as his invoking of his own daughters in a discussion of the Fluke-Limbaugh situation implies, but thats if you believe his feigned moral outrage. Here you have the pinnacle of hypocrisy. Obama waxes philosophically on the shame of what Rush Limbaugh said prospectively of Sandra Fluke, and yet he permits a SuperPAC operating in his name to accept money from a misogynist like Bill Maher?
The fact is that the things Bill Maher has said about conservative women are far worse than Rush Limbaughs proposed words, and honestly, if we can see media castigate Rick Santorum because Foster Freiss made his remark about an aspirin between the knees, surely this President, who poses as the savior of women, and who has the President of NOW selling out the organizations stated principles on his behalf could stand firm against misogyny.
What this demonstrates is that Barack Obama is a political prostitute, and that his principles and haughty talk about misogyny all goes out the window for a measly million dollars. Hes just announced his price, if you ask me, and he might as well stand on a DC street corner asking for the support of lobbyists in much the same way. Unfortunately for us, he has no need of a street corner because he has turned the Oval Office into the political brothel-of-state, where he routinely sells out all of his lofty notions about the interests of the people and change along with whatever else hes selling on any given day. The lobbyists had no problem finding him when it came time for the negotiations on the health-care bill, or the financial reform act. They merely made deposits at the bank of the DNC and his favorite campaign SuperPacs, and for chump-change, he willingly put out.
Rush Limbaugh neednt have proposed that Sandra Fluke might be a prostitute or a slut. He really only needed to point out that the nations head madame is a he, and that he plies his trade at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Those who were confused shouldnt be now, because Barack Obama has made it clear: Hes for sale, and the bidding starts at one million dollars, setting the price at which he will overlook anything, no matter how vile.
NOW has never been an organization representing women, only liberal women..when it comes to Conservative women they enjoy reading about and hearing the disgusting attacks that we have to live with everyday. NOW is nothing more then liberal propaganda promoting the homosexual and abortion agenda that they have.
Today we are talking about words, semantics really. In the 1990’s we had a President for which there was irrefutable proof had raped, abused, and used women throughout his career. And it had continued into his presidency.
And NOW, being the obedient little boot licking whores that they are, said nothing. Expect them to get concerned about words? Not a chance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.