Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum on defensive as race turns to Louisiana
WBAY, ABC ^ | Mar 23, 2012 6:10 PM EDT (updated) | JIM KUHNHENN and STEVE PEOPLES

Posted on 03/24/2012 8:28:18 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP

Facing heightened pressure to revive his presidential bid, Rick Santorum was forced to explain another apparent misstep as he courted Louisiana voters Friday, the eve of a critical contest in a Republican nomination battle that increasingly favors Mitt Romney.

Santorum said he would support the eventual GOP nominee - if it isn't him - despite what he insists are similarities between front-runner Romney and President Barack Obama that make them indistinguishable on some issues. He caused an intraparty uproar earlier in the week after suggesting he'd prefer a second term for Obama over a Romney presidency.

"I've said repeatedly and will continue to say, I'll vote for whoever the Republican nominee is and I will work for him," Santorum said as he walked back his original comments less than 24 hours before Louisiana polls were set to open. "Barack Obama is a disaster, but we can't have someone who agrees with him on some of the biggest issues of the day."

The situation underscored Santorum's challenges ahead of a Louisiana contest he's favored to win. Santorum has had success in the South, having won last week's contests in Alabama and Mississippi. Regardless of the outcome Saturday, however, Romney will have collected more delegates than his opponents combined as the race then turns to more favorable territory in the coming weeks.

Santorum's continued missteps are complicating a candidacy already struggling to overcome major financial and organizational deficiencies. Before losing this week's Illinois primary, Santorum hurt himself by declaring that neither the economy nor the nation's unemployment rate was his top concern.

"I think the biggest development of the last 24 hours was Sen. Santorum's remarkable mistake in suggesting that re-electing President Obama was acceptable under any circumstance," Republican contender Newt Gingrich told reporters in Port Fourchon, La. (snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at wbay.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ihaterick; obsession; obsessivecompulsive; rickhaters; toomuchfreetime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last
Louisiana offers a total of 46 delegates, but only 20 will be up for grabs in Saturday's primary. An additional 23 will be selected at the party's state convention in June and three others go to the state's Republican National Committee members.

And while Santorum tried to recover from one misstep, a supporter in the audience added an off-message wrinkle. As he fired the pistol, a woman in the crowd shouted: "Pretend it's Obama."

1 posted on 03/24/2012 8:28:22 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Ugh, was she from #OWS?

Rick Biden, its time to go home.


2 posted on 03/24/2012 8:30:41 AM PDT by omega4179 (Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Santorum’s original comment made perfect sense: If the GOP offers a candidate very similar to the incumbent, people will stick with the known quantity. I also think that is exactly what is going to happen.


3 posted on 03/24/2012 8:34:15 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
[As he fired the pistol, a woman in the crowd shouted: "Pretend it's Obama."]

What was Rick doing at a range with a crowd? Is he touched?

Hey Rick, going to the range isn't a game show.

4 posted on 03/24/2012 8:37:19 AM PDT by Miss Behave (All ways, always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179
Only 20 delegates are up for grabs, but just watch the Santorum fanatics proclaim his 10 or 11 delegate “victory” as “stunning, amazing, pnenomenal!”, which will cause them to celebrate one of many, great victories that have assured that he will be elected President, in spite of reality.
5 posted on 03/24/2012 8:38:40 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
If Santorum wins Looosiana Mittbot Psycho Freak may have to admit that maybe-perhaps-well it could be-the moon is bloo-I’m stuck on stupid—that all his compulsive obsessive Santorum loathing was in vain--but I doubt it.
6 posted on 03/24/2012 8:39:48 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Those of us who think from a realistic perspective, fully understand how Santorum’s original comment made perfect sense to you.....(Notice your subliminal use of the word “Perfect”)

Now, back to the real world again!

7 posted on 03/24/2012 8:41:52 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miss Behave

Santo is grandstanding again, trying to get the NRA loyals to identify for him. It was a typical Santorum photo op (Iowa Pheasant hunt, not for his pure love of the sport, but a pathetic display for political gain.)


8 posted on 03/24/2012 8:44:52 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
At this stage all who denigrate Santorum are Mittbots cuz it is now a two man race.

No ifs ands or butts.

9 posted on 03/24/2012 8:45:37 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

And the elites just cannot understand why we don’t trust or want mitt.


10 posted on 03/24/2012 8:49:14 AM PDT by mathluv ( Conservative first and foremost, republican second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Sheesh.

Relax would ya? Willard has the nomination in the bag.

11 posted on 03/24/2012 8:49:33 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Behave; PSYCHO-FREEP

It’s moments like this that I hate politics and the politicians make me cringe.


12 posted on 03/24/2012 8:50:00 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

LOL! Name calling children like yourself are always quick to pick a fight or shout insults when they are outclassed. Only problem is, I don’t play with children, so you will have to find someone else who is more on your level of juvenile proclivity.


13 posted on 03/24/2012 8:53:48 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Ok, I am calling you on your own Bull S**t.

Prove to this forum, where I support Romney. Your pathetic insinuations don’t count either. Go on, get busy!......


14 posted on 03/24/2012 8:58:01 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
If somebody held a gun to your head and said to either choose Rick, Mitt or Obama what would you say?

Because that is the real world as of now. Newt is dead as dead.

Don't give me sophistry just a choice, a straight answer to a revealing-for you- hypothetical IF you have the guts to stray from your usual contemptuous disingenuous nature.

15 posted on 03/24/2012 8:58:20 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Look who’s calling the kettle black?

But really, you are getting desperate, like your candidate.

I support Newt, and you know that, so stop making extreme extrapolations from your limited perspective. Like I said earlier, I don’t argue with children.


16 posted on 03/24/2012 9:03:43 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
No he doesn't—PF is a Mitt operative and wants you to think that way—don't give in to the dark side!
17 posted on 03/24/2012 9:04:33 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I said no sophistry.

Even Spock's idiot bastard son knows how weak you are on logic—only Santorum can stop Mitt so ipso facto your deranged Rick hate makes you a Romney running dog.

BAM!!! That's reality smacking you upside the head FRiend!!!

18 posted on 03/24/2012 9:10:22 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator

[PF is a Mitt operative and wants you to think that way]

You had better back that claim up, because I am calling you on it.....


19 posted on 03/24/2012 9:10:25 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

More Lamestream lies from PSYCHO-FREEP.

Santorum did not say that he would vote for Obama, or any of the other twists that the left has been putting on this.

What he said is that Mitt Romney is not a satisfactory ALTERNATIVE to Obama, because he has many of the same faults. They are both lying socialists. That was perfectly correct. Pushing Romney gives us no real choice. It’s a Stalinist Communist vs. a Leninist Communist, with both of them more than happy to kill babies, push gay marriage, nationalize healthcare, and spend like there’s no tomorrow.

You say that you are bashing Santorum because you prefer Newt. But the purpose of the left wing press and the RINO establishment is to nominate Romney, not Newt, and that is what you are helping them do, whether you realize it or not.

If Romney is nominated, I will not vote for him, and neither will a lot of other people. But if enough lies are spread about Santorum at this critical juncture, then Romney is going to be nominated. Why do you think Drudge and the GOP/e are all pushing this story?


20 posted on 03/24/2012 9:11:03 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Go ahead and try to get me zotted—we have both been here 12 years—I'll let the mods and JR decide...

...your partisan and irrational attacks on the best hope for America aka Rick Santorum—the only real treat to Mitt and Obama—though I like Newt—will bear me out.

21 posted on 03/24/2012 9:17:33 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Whether one agrees with Santorum’s opinion or not, the real inexcusable error is the fact that it proves Santorum has a knack for unforced idiocy. What he said had zero potential for gain, and tremendous potential for misunderstanding, but he said it anyway. That’s just not very bright, and the hostile post-primary press will have field day after field day.


22 posted on 03/24/2012 9:20:02 AM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

You’re right. I don’t have any proof other than a month or two’s worth of circumstantial evidence - your manic efforts to bring down the only guy in this race who’s in reach of the nomination - besides Willard.


23 posted on 03/24/2012 9:23:06 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
So to you Rick is a dope,yet what would be YOUR answer to post 15...

...remember, no paralogisms.

24 posted on 03/24/2012 9:24:34 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
Oh, but don't disagree with the Santuckabee fanatics, you will get severely flamed and denigrated as a “Romneybot”.

You are correct that the Press will and IS having a field day at all of Santorum’s countless gaffs. And DON'T YOU DARE, point that out.

25 posted on 03/24/2012 9:27:03 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Grasping at straws, did any of the ladies have fish net hose on so you could say there might have been a hooker in the crowd. Unbelievable!


26 posted on 03/24/2012 9:28:43 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
"Santo is grandstanding again, trying to get the NRA loyals to identify for him. It was a typical Santorum photo op (Iowa Pheasant hunt, not for his pure love of the sport, but a pathetic display for political gain.)"

This is what I think, as well. I can't help but contrast it with Rick Perry's GENUINE love of guns. He did his shooting on his off time, not to pander for votes. Santorum's effort just doesn't come across as the real thing.

27 posted on 03/24/2012 9:29:33 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
Exactly. When a candidate continues to make a whole series of unforced errors, you eventually are justified in asking--does this guy really want to win, or just want to shoot his mouth off.
28 posted on 03/24/2012 9:30:09 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
This article is full of lies about Santorum. Santorum NEVER said he would vote for Obama if Romney were the nominee. What he said was that if the Republicans nominate a candidate who is almost exactly like Obama voters might choose Obama. This media falsehood is an attempt to distract from the Romney adviser’s etch-a-sketch comments.

Santorum reiterated that he would support the Republican candidate. He did not “backtrack”. I am tired the the constant media lies about Santorum and his supposed gaffes.
I am also tired of FReeprers, who should no better, mindlessly parroting the media narrative about Santorum being dumb etc.

29 posted on 03/24/2012 9:30:54 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
You of all people know the result of a Santorum nomination against Obama. Neither candidate is valid. I do not vote out of desperation. I vote for who I know is the best choice
and that choice for me is Newt Gingrich. As long as he is in the race, that is who I support.
30 posted on 03/24/2012 9:32:26 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Your man doesn't stand a chance, and you know it. All you're doing is helping guarantee a Willard victory.

The question is, do you know that or not?

31 posted on 03/24/2012 9:36:14 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
When Bachmann was the front runner, she made a 'series of unforced errors', as did Cain, as did Perry, as did Newt, as is Santorum.

And Newt will get the same treatment AGAIN should he by some miracle overtake Santorum.

Only Willard gets a relative pass.

Are you seriously gonna tell me you you don't see the pattern here?

32 posted on 03/24/2012 9:40:18 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: detective
It is what it is. Santorum has been taken out of context but the MSM will continue to do what it does best.

You act like that is my fault. If Santorum were a viable and dynamic politician, he would know what to say and how to say it. Instead, he blabbers off these ridiculous and numerous gaffs which the Press is making extreme examples of.

This is not the first time Santorum has opened his over sized mouth and promptly planted both of his size 11’s simultaneously. He has repeatedly done this time after time. It's like he is incapable of learning or something. His advisers must be tearing their hair out by now.

Is Santorum dumb? You can answer that question yourself, by simply taking a realistic look at what I outlined above.

If this is who you are convinced will be the nominee, AND be the most likely to win against Obama and the Billion dollar machine, supported by the Federal Treasury, then you need to seriously revisit your own mental capacity.

33 posted on 03/24/2012 9:45:41 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
Answer post 15 please.
34 posted on 03/24/2012 9:45:52 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Answer post 15 please.


35 posted on 03/24/2012 9:46:49 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Santorum has been taken out of context

No he wasn't. He said what he said.

His entire speech has been run over and over, ad nauseum.

That is context.


36 posted on 03/24/2012 9:52:59 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repubs paid as much attention to Rush as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
Right, it's no coincidence that Santuckabee is seen at these little displays during certain key elections. Especially were the population is heavily NRA or Pheasant Hunting oriented.

The same thing backfired on Kerry in 2004. The obvious is all to prevalent.

37 posted on 03/24/2012 9:53:12 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

” If somebody held a gun to your head and said either choose Rick, Mitt or Obama what would you say?”

That’s ridiculous, sounds like kids in the schoolyard.I’m saving the whole argument about holding my nose or voting 3rd party until it becomes necessary. If Santorum and Newt are out today then today is the day to start that discussion. The reason they want that discussion today is to promote Romney’s inevitability. That discussion shouldn’t happen until after the convention, if at all.


38 posted on 03/24/2012 9:53:47 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
"Answer post 15 please."

Why?

The other night, after Romney won Illinois, some hysterical Santorum supporter--can't recall who it was---implied that all who failed to immediately get on board Santorum's bus were closet Romney plants. Are you trying to advance that ridiculous POV?

Do a detailed search of my posts. Get back to me if you find even one that HINTS of being a Romney supporter, and post it so everyone can see. Otherwise, please don't waste my time with such lunacy.

39 posted on 03/24/2012 9:59:06 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Miss Behave

What was Rick doing at a range with a crowd? Is he touched?


snip
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum fired a few rounds at the Ouachita Parish Sheriff’s Office Rifle Range on Friday morning before taking verbal jabs at his opponents during a public rally in which he described himself as the only candidate who can provide a “clear contrast” to President Barack Obama.

After demonstrating his marksmanship with a .45-caliber semiautomatic Colt pistol, Santorum talked to a crowd of a few hundred Ouachita Parish residents about his plans to lower energy prices, produce more jobs and limit government.
snip

http://www.thenewsstar.com/article/20120324/NEWS01/203240334/Santorum-fires-away?odyssey=tab|topnews|img|FRONTPAGE


40 posted on 03/24/2012 9:59:44 AM PDT by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
If one were to gage it from the overall media response, the outline on what Santo said, boils down to the headlines that make the claim. This is what sticks in the minds of the public.

All the excuses, explanations, clarifications, apologies, etc,, won't change a thing. The thing that sticks in 90% of the public minds is the original headline. And in truth, when Santo left so much to be headlined in the first place, this will be the result every time.

And these are not lies, Santo did say it.

41 posted on 03/24/2012 10:00:42 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: duffee
I remember as a kid in the schoolyard we settled a lot of things...

...so absent any rational dissent, I can only suppose you are for Romney and then, of course, Obama.

42 posted on 03/24/2012 10:01:06 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
So no honest answer in choosing between Rick Mitt or Obama—even in a hypothetical?

Typical of a covert Mittbotts who have used other candidates--some gone others who should be gone--as covers for their Santorum smears.

43 posted on 03/24/2012 10:07:47 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

[I remember as a kid in the schoolyard we settled a lot of things...]

LOL! That is one of the most nonsensical opinions I have ever seen used in an adult political discussion. But in your case, it is evident that you are still there. (Based on your final sentence.)


44 posted on 03/24/2012 10:08:54 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
“you need to seriously revisit your own mental capacity.”

I wish Santorum was more articulate and was better at dealing with the media and the issues. But he is not dumb. He is being targeted. He is being lied about. His words are taken out of context and twisted to fit with the false narrative presented by the MSM.

The false narrative is only effective if people spread it. I don't care if you disagree with Santorum or if you think he is not the best candidate.

You don't need to sink to personal insults. People can disagree without personal attacks.

45 posted on 03/24/2012 10:09:06 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
You know what PF? You have a flair of sorts—I can almost hear your voice in your posts.

I remember how when I first read Stephen King way back when the voice in my head was arbitrary. But later when I heard King's actual voice it was as if he were the narrator of his subsequent works in my mind.

Strange.

Oops, sorry—bit of a sidetrack—you are wrong:)

46 posted on 03/24/2012 10:19:20 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick Santorum--Public Enemy #1 of Leftists, RINOs and the GOP Establishmnet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: detective
I was speaking in the hypothetical. If you take that personally, then I will withdraw that last thought. I did not say it quite appropriately.

This whole thread has been one big personal attack, on anyone who does not bow down to Rick Santorum. Period.

We have been accused of all sorts of Leftist crimes against those pure and perfect conservatives who command all righteous Profligacy (LOL! That word will keep them busy for a while.)

47 posted on 03/24/2012 10:19:20 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I don’t think profligacy is even a word.


48 posted on 03/24/2012 10:22:37 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Facing heightened pressure to revive his presidential bid, Rick Santorum was forced to explain another apparent misstep as he courted Louisiana voters Friday, the eve of a critical contest in a Republican nomination battle that increasingly favors Mitt Romney.

First, it's an ABC affiliate story, so there is a slant to it that favors Mitt and tries to diminish Rick. That's where I typicaly tune out.

The language used that I highlighted is indicative of their intent. Santorum's campaign has a reasonably good head of steam to it and more and more voters are being turned off by mittens.

49 posted on 03/24/2012 10:22:55 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
Definition of PROFLIGACY : the quality or state of being profligate See profligacy defined for kids » Examples of PROFLIGACY First Known Use of PROFLIGACY 1738 Related to PROFLIGACY Synonyms: corruption, debauchery, depravity, immorality, iniquitousness, iniquity, libertinage, libertinism, licentiousness, vice, sin Antonyms: morality, virtue
50 posted on 03/24/2012 10:25:27 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson