Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Assumes Dictatorial Powers
Dick Morris.Com ^ | March 23, 2012 | Dick Morris

Posted on 03/24/2012 5:35:16 PM PDT by Hojczyk

With two presidential signatures- one on New Year’s Day and the other issued last week – President Barack Obama has assumed the right to assert dictatorial powers over almost all aspects of the U.S. economy and to hold American citizens indefinitely without trial!

On New Year’s Day, Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to fund the Pentagon. But smuggled into its language is an explicit authority “allowing him to indefinitely detain [US] citizens” according to Jonathan Turley writing in the U.K. Guardian newspaper.

While the story was buried in the American media, Turley notes that it is “one of the greatest rollbacks of civil liberties” in American history.

Perhaps even more terrifying is the executive order President Obama signed on Friday, March 16 giving him vast powers to control every aspect of the U.S. economy in the event of war or even during a peacetime “emergency.” Edwin Black, writing for the liberal-oriented Huffington Post, says that the order “may have quietly placed the United States on a war preparedness footing” possibly in anticipation of “an outbreak of war between Israel, the West, and Iran.”

Read the full text of Turley’s article at

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/jan/02/ndaa-historic-assault-american-liberty

Read the full text of Black’s article at

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edwin-black/obama-national-defense-resources-preparedness_b_1359715.html

(Excerpt) Read more at dickmorris.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: kingofthedeficit; nobirthcertificate; noconstitution; nodocumentation

1 posted on 03/24/2012 5:35:21 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Congress has the power to roll those EOs back and eliminate them. The fact they haven’t moved to do so is frightening.


2 posted on 03/24/2012 5:42:05 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Don’t leave it to the Grim Weeper.


3 posted on 03/24/2012 5:46:10 PM PDT by boomop1 (term limits is the only way to save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I’ve had it in my head that, should Obama lose the November election, he will attempt to seize power and rule as a dictator.

Then again, I think the cleaners shrunk my tin foil hat. It’s pressing on my brain.


4 posted on 03/24/2012 5:46:31 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

What if a two bit black man took control of a country and no one listened?


5 posted on 03/24/2012 5:48:06 PM PDT by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Hmmm... Normally I am leery of anything the toe-sucker says, but it seems he is sticking his neck out a bit farther than usual with this.

Of course, he’s been written off by the Dems and Libs since the end of the Clinton regime, and has been distrusted by Conservatives for just as long, but the pragmatic folks on on both sides just shrugged off his rightward drift as a professional move aimed at keeping the cash flowing.

This seems to have stepped over a line. It would almost be as bad as taking up the eligibility issue as far as the MSM and the Libs are concerned because he directly assaulting Obama — which he has not really done up to this point.

The repercussions here could be interesting. Worth keeping an eye on.


6 posted on 03/24/2012 5:48:56 PM PDT by Ronin (Sarah.... We really need you now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


7 posted on 03/24/2012 5:50:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Congress has the power to roll those EOs back and eliminate them. The fact they haven’t moved to do so is frightening.

Which should tell us something about the members of congress belonging to *both parties*.

8 posted on 03/24/2012 5:52:07 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

And, as expected, Congress assumes the fetal position.


9 posted on 03/24/2012 5:53:26 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)was legislation passed through congress, not an EO.

Yes, we should be concerned.


10 posted on 03/24/2012 6:00:22 PM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
"What if a two bit black man took control of a country and no one listened?"

What are the odds of that? That's like saying that some day America could ever elect a communist muslim president.

11 posted on 03/24/2012 6:00:56 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

WOw...even Dick Morris gets it.


12 posted on 03/24/2012 6:03:32 PM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Would love to read something of objective analysts about this rather than “see I told you he was a dictator” from the excitable crowd.


13 posted on 03/24/2012 6:03:32 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (obamacare is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

For the second time this month, Congress has passed a short-term continuing resolution and avoid a government shutdown. And for the second time, this was accomplished at the cost of dropping a provision that would have prevented the use of government funds to implement Obamacare. It raises the question, then, of just how committed the Republican leadership really is to killing Obamacare.

It is worth remembering that House Republicans did NOT include the cutoff in health-care funding as part of their original CR proposal. It was added as an amendment after a mini-rebellion by House conservatives. And the leadership was quick to jettison it at the first sign of Democratic objection. Now it appears that House Republican leaders have blinked yet again.

Apparently it is more important to keep the government open than to stand up against the most massive threat to limited government and individual liberty in recent history.

In fact, one wonders what the Republican leadership is doing to stop Obamacare. Sure, they took a vote to repeal it. But since there was no chance that a repeal bill could get through the Senate and past a presidential veto, the vote was mostly symbolic.

Since then, what have Republicans done? There was another vote calling for various committees to propose an alternative health-care reform. Where is it? Where are the votes on proposals to kill some of the more unpopular aspects of the health-care law? What about the individual mandate? The employer mandate? The new taxes? What about CLASS Act, the long-term care program? Even Secretary Sebelius says that it won’t work as currently structured. Why has there been no vote to repeal that?

Cutting off funding for Obamacare now is all the more important because the administration is pushing full speed ahead on implementation. And the sad fact is that Obama is all too often being aided by Republicans.


14 posted on 03/24/2012 6:36:10 PM PDT by LC Gladiator (Barack Obama is a malevolent Marxist cockroach and a foul festering pustule on the hide of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Not on those E.O.s, but here is some great testimony from Attny George Mannina on Obama’s Ocean Policy, which is essentially executive legislation superceding existing statute. It sets up a regional governance board of federal agencies and tribes. It exempts itself from judicial review and eliminates due process. (This might be logical enough for you.)

George Mannina’s testimony on violation of the separation of powers before the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing on “Empty Hooks: The National Ocean Policy is the Latest Threat to Access for Recreational and Commercial Fishermen” March 22, 2012: http://naturalresources.house.gov/UploadedFiles/ManninaTestimony03.22.12.pdf

Watch it at: http://resources.edgeboss.net/wmedia/resources/112/2012_03_22_fwoia.wvx

webcast 27:13-32:25, 40:50-44:11, (Rep. Duncan 1:01:19-1:05:47); 1:07:30-1:11:07; 1:29:46-1:34:30; 1:34:40-1:36:36;

Ref: Loving v. United States (94-1966), 517 U.S. 748 (1996)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94-1966.ZO.html

Ref: 2011 Presidential Executive Order 13547 to unilaterally implement a new National Ocean Policy http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-stewardship-ocean-our-coasts-and-great-lakes

Lacks Congressional Authorization http://naturalresources.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=262435
(Unilateral Action by the Obama Administration; Imposes Ocean/Coastal Zoning; Creates federally-dominated Regional Planning Bodies with no representation from the people being regulated.)

Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force: Interim Report
http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/09_17_09_Interim_Report_of_Task_Force_FINAL2.pdf


15 posted on 03/24/2012 6:37:41 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Congress has known all about Obama. They are all guilty of being accessories to treason.


16 posted on 03/24/2012 6:40:12 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
I’ve had it in my head that, should Obama lose the November election, he will attempt to seize power and rule as a dictator.


Me too. I do not believe he will go quietly. He may do it by fomenting civil unrest (as he is doing now) or he may just start a war somewhere to hold on to power.

It is important to note, that the he is a big, huge, supporter and friend of the Muslim Brotherhood. Those are the guys who he gave almost all of North Africa to, using American armed forces to do it. And, he has been nothing but deferential and cooperative with Iran. Both of these entities are terrorist organizations and they owe him a favor.

They may do some kind of attack big enough to keep their friend and brother in power over the evil White Infidels.

Anything could happen. I don't think it is going to be good no matter what happens.

17 posted on 03/24/2012 8:04:49 PM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 240B
Both of these entities are terrorist organizations and they owe him a favor.

I'm inclined to think he's going to capitalize on the Sunni vs. Shiite division and go after Iran. He'll have the Brotherhood on his side, as well as Israel.

I've got a sinking feeling that we're cooked.

18 posted on 03/24/2012 8:17:54 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EBH

How liberal is Dick Morris usually?


19 posted on 03/24/2012 8:34:31 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Congress has the power to roll those EOs back and eliminate them

I'm convinced CONGRESS is unconsciously going through the motions and literally doesn't have a CLUE as to what's happening on their watch.

20 posted on 03/24/2012 8:42:25 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The drumbeat of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack grows ever louder: regulate -— control -— destroy -— Regulate -— control -— destroy -— REulate -— control -— destroy -— REGulate -— control -— destroy -— REGU


21 posted on 03/24/2012 8:54:15 PM PDT by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

And in the House: “zzzzzzzzz....”


22 posted on 03/24/2012 10:09:47 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
I’ve had it in my head that, should Obama lose the November election, he will attempt to seize power and rule as a dictator. Then again, I think the cleaners shrunk my tin foil hat. It’s pressing on my brain.

That would definitely cause an uprising - I'd guess he's trying to hold Israel off until it's close to election time, so when they hit Iran, it will be the "emergency" he needs to exercise these un-Constitutional powers.

23 posted on 03/25/2012 4:20:02 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I don’t see this guy ever leaving the White House


24 posted on 03/25/2012 5:17:47 AM PDT by Ouch (No B-HO in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson