Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

But when blacks attack whites in unprovoked attacks, even though they are screaming racial slurs, the local cops and “liberals” say it is not a hate crime.

It happened in Portland, Oregon and Philadelphia recently.

14 year old white girl brutally beaten by black thugs caught on video. News broadcasters explain why it was NOT a hate crime about about 2:12 minutes into the video even though the black thugs were shouting racial slurs at their white victim

Obviously that is not the same standard the Feds use if whites use racial slurs attacking blacks:

Same denial of the civil rights of white victims of racist attacks in Philly as in Portland:

“College senior Brian Goldman and his cab driver were allegedly assaulted by three juveniles last Saturday. The three teens will not be charged with a hate crime, according to the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office.

The three black teens allegedly shouted racial slurs when they punched Goldman and his cab driver at 15th and Chestnut streets around 8:30 p.m.

However, there was no evidence that the race of the victims was a factor in the assault, according to the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.

“I fully support the DA’s decision, 100 percent,” Goldman, a Daily Pennsylvanian columnist, said.”

42 posted on 03/26/2012 5:07:05 AM PDT by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Lonny

Also, Eric, “My People” Holder, Obama’s
black Attorney General has explicitly stated that white Americans, unless they are homosexual, are NOT PROTECTED by federal hate crime laws.He said this before the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 29,2009:

“Under questioning, Attorney Gen. Holder was surprisingly forthright in admitting that the hate bill is not intended to protect everyone, or even the majority. He said only historically oppressed minorities were to benefit. This means Jews, blacks, homosexuals, women, etc. Holder made it clear that if a white Christian male, including a serviceman or police officer, was the victim of a violent hate crime by any minority he would have to find redress from traditional law. He could not avail himself of the triple penalties and rapid government/justice system response given a protected minority.”

“Holder made it plain that he is seeking legal privileges for certain groups based on what he told Senator Sessions was

“the unfortunate history of our nation”.

Film can indeed tell more than the printed word. Anyone who reviews the comments and deliveries by Democratic Senators Feinstein(CA), Cardin (MD)and Schumer (NY)(c. 53 minutes, 79 minutes and 89 minutes) cannot doubt that, for them, this legislation is a stepping stone to criminalizing political opinion.

Feinstein actually cited the immigration debate as necessitating passing the Bill!”

Why Republicans dont use Holders racist double standard to hammer Obama in this election year is beyond me. If they did and stuck to their guns, it would be a win/win situation. That blacks are violently attacking whites all the time is well known by a lot of whites despite the media blackout. This dam of well founded anger by whites could break with a national campaign by the Rs pointing out the injustice of Holders racist double standard while highlighting suppressed news stories of violent black on white attacks that should be punished by the hate crime laws.

But Holder was right about one thing, although for reasons opposite of what he meant. We truly are a “Nation of Cowards” when it comes to race

50 posted on 03/26/2012 6:00:23 AM PDT by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson