Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Real Oil Agenda
Townhall.com ^ | March 26, 2012 | Dan Holler

Posted on 03/26/2012 7:15:52 AM PDT by Kaslin

Soaring gas prices pose a major electoral vulnerability to a President so damaged he refused to celebrate the two year anniversary of his marquee domestic accomplishment. That is why, for the past several weeks, President Obama and his administration have been in damage control mode.

At stops around the country, he sought to deflect blame for the pain Americans are experiencing at the pump. President Obama’s basic defense goes something like this: presidents cannot control the price of gasoline, but I have increased domestic oil production and decreased our reliance on foreign oil, so really, when you think about it, we’re winning the future.

Last week, Rush Limbaugh correctly pointed out that President Obama’s logic is flawed at best, bipolar at worst. You cannot claim increasing oil production is meaningless and then take credit for increasing oil production. The logistical gymnastics are enough to give you whiplash.

Even more interesting though is how President Obama attempts to convince Americans that decreasing oil imports (hello, Canada), is in their economic interests. In Cushing, Oklahoma last week, President Obama tried to make the connection that “reduc[ing] our dependence on foreign oil” will “ultimately help to curb the spike in gas prices.”

For that to be true, you would have to believe that oil is not a global commodity. Simply reducing our “dependence on foreign oil” will not influence the global price of oil. To have an impact on global prices we must produce more or use less.

During a speech in Miami, President Obama planted himself firmly in the use less oil camp. Amidst laughter, he said efficiency was one of the “easiest ways to reduce our dependence on oil.” Missing from the phrase was the word “foreign.” Was it simply just a slip of the tongue, or something more revealing?

Well, just a month earlier when President Obama rejected the Keystone XL Pipeline, he claimed the rejection was part of his commitment to policies that reduce our “dependence on oil.” President Obama does not just want to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, as he frequently states, but all oil.

Now, it may be tempting to dismiss the presence or absence of the word “foreign” as mere semantics – and that is exactly what the White House wants you to do. The truth, though, is that the policy implications are huge.

If you want to reduce America’s reliance on foreign oil, as many do, you proceed with domestic oil production as rapidly as possible. With more than 200 years of oil in the ground, a strategy of domestic production makes sense…unless you are opposed to oil consumption.

Not only does President Obama constantly downplay the amount of oil America has in the ground, he has slowed domestic oil production on federal lands. According to his own Energy Information Agency, oil production on federal lands is down 13 percent this year and onshore leases in 2010 were the lowest since 1984. And the administration has withdrawn leases in Utah and Montana, cancelled sales in coastal regions and finalized burdensome regulations.

There should be absolutely no doubt that the Obama administration’s actions are consistent with the desire to end America’s use of oil, not simply our use of foreign oil. Their policies are not about lowering the price for consumers, but ending the use of oil and expediting our path towards a mysterious fuel of the future.

Even though Americans with cars understand oil is the fuel of the present, the Obama administration believes it is the fuel of the past. And unfortunately for American motorists, the Obama administration has strong and sympathetic allies in the U.S. Senate. This week, the Senate will debate a bill to increase taxes on domestic oil companies.

As is typical, though, they will claim the tax hike is designed to help consumers, who are paying too much at the pump. But when President Obama’s own deputy assistant for energy and climate change was asked if such a tax would lower prices, she deferred, saying it was about “fairness.”

President Obama will not make the argument that his policies are designed to bring down prices at the pump, because they are not. And on rare occasions, he will slip and acknowledge his true goal is to kill oil. That is a tough sell for drivers and voters, which is why President Obama will continue his tour of deflection.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: drilling; energy; gasoline; gasprices; greenenergy; keystonepipeline; oil; oilandgas; oilcompanies

1 posted on 03/26/2012 7:15:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama’s Real Oil Agenda: Pond scum.


2 posted on 03/26/2012 7:17:01 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And on rare occasions, he will slip and acknowledge his true goal is to kill oil.

No, his true goal is to kill the USA.

3 posted on 03/26/2012 7:24:20 AM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

“Their policies are not about lowering the price for consumers, but ending the use of oil and expediting our path towards a mysterious fuel of the future.”

Which relies on an earth that is suffering from global warming and isn’t predictable.

I see irony here.


4 posted on 03/26/2012 7:47:00 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Solyent Pink is Sheeple!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

Oil is the fuel of the engine of capitalism and freedom.
Indeed, he wants to cut that fuel supply off, except for “approved” usages by “approved” people.


5 posted on 03/26/2012 7:50:23 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
POND SCUM, ALGEA PRESIDENT
6 posted on 03/26/2012 7:50:32 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ...
RE :”At stops around the country, he sought to deflect blame for the pain Americans are experiencing at the pump. President Obama’s basic defense goes something like this: presidents cannot control the price of gasoline, but I have increased domestic oil production and decreased our reliance on foreign oil, so really, when you think about it, we’re winning the future.
Last week, Rush Limbaugh correctly pointed out that President Obama’s logic is flawed at best, bipolar at worst. You cannot claim increasing oil production is meaningless and then take credit for increasing oil production. The logistical gymnastics are enough to give you whiplash.
Even more interesting though is how President Obama attempts to convince Americans that decreasing oil imports (hello, Canada), is in their economic interests. In Cushing, Oklahoma last week, President Obama tried to make the connection that “reduc[ing] our dependence on foreign oil” will “ultimately help to curb the spike in gas prices.”
For that to be true, you would have to believe that oil is not a global commodity. Simply reducing our “dependence on foreign oil” will not influence the global price of oil. To have an impact on global prices we must produce more or use less.

Obama says that drilling will not impact the price of gas, yet he says becoming energy independent with green energy like electric cars will, and he says that he has approved more drilling than any other POTUS, while at the same time asking foreigners to increase oil production for our import, and last year releasing oil from the strategic oil reserves.

Also from Obama :The POTUS has no control over gas prices when he is Obama, but does have control when he is GWB.

Obama has a new story every day on this. Too bad Romney agrees with Obama on global warming.

7 posted on 03/26/2012 8:21:20 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

Yep, if you attack the hub, you take down western man.

All American policies extend to the developed nations firstly tna then the secondery developing nations and then the trulky marginal turd world nations. In attacking America, he is removing the stability and peace structures in the world. This is the stuff global disorder (/wars) is made of.

FUBO and your muslo-marxism-UN-new world order dreams.


8 posted on 03/26/2012 8:53:12 AM PDT by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Oil is the fuel of the engine of capitalism and freedom. Indeed, he wants to cut that fuel supply off, except for “approved” usages by “approved” people.

Here's what Obama has brought us.


9 posted on 03/26/2012 9:13:20 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Obama’s Real Oil Agenda: Pond scum.

Nah. They're just running out of money laundering schemes. They're down to pond scum.

10 posted on 03/26/2012 10:29:07 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson