Posted on 03/27/2012 2:05:59 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
In the United States the Social Security numbers were assigned by the states. The first 3 digits of the number that Obama is using, (042) were assigned to the state of Connecticut. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut and there is no legitimate reason for him to have this number.
I can disclose this number and make it public in this article for two reasons:
1. Inadvertently Obama himself made it public when he published his tax returns on line and did not flatten the PDF file. Thousands of individuals around the world opened the file using Adobe Illustrator program and got the number 042-68-4425.
2. We know that this number was assigned to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890. (If you believe that Obama is that person, you can stop reading this article, as nothing will get through to you anyways.)
In my research I was able to secure assistance of three licensed investigators: retired Scotland Yard senior officer Neil Sankey, licensed investigator Susan Daniels and recently retired senior Deportation Officer John Sampson. All of them searched different national databases, which are routinely used by licensed investigators and attorneys and came to the same conclusion: Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States and commander in Chief does not have a valid Social Security number. National databases showed his name linked to several Social Security numbers, none of which was issued in the state of Hawaii, where he grew up. The number that Obama used more often for most of his life, is a Connecticut Social Security number issued to a resident of Connecticut, whose date of birth shows as 1890. This was the same number that Obama posted on his tax returns: 042-68-4425.
(Excerpt) Read more at english.pravda.ru ...
I think somebody once pointed out that Obama’s SSN could be the result of an error made by a bureaucrat in an era when such things were generated and assigned by hand - no personal computers, just card- and tape-fed monsters. I forget the exact content, but there was like a one digit difference from his SSN being “valid” for his alleged birthplace, Hawaii.
Just darn.
The guy posted right before me!
Have you ever known anyone who’s entire life consisted of so many “typos” and oopsies and mistakes and misrepresentations and coinky dinks and downright lies? Strike half of those into the “my bad” file and there’s still more weird carp than is anywhere near the realm of reasonable.
But that doesn't mean he wasn't born in Hawaii and that his SSN isn't a product of bureaucratic mediocrity.
once again, I ask where you got this information...
This claim is false. “We” know no such thing. Orly's claim doesn't have a chance of holding up in any legal proceeding (and has failed repeatedly in court to be considered as evidence) because it fails to meet the most rudimentary requirements under the rules of evidence. The 1890 claim is based on a stray notation of one computer printout as being “associated with” this number.
Only further discovery of Social Security records under court order can establish whether the 1890 date means anything of probative value.
The CT SSN was shown to have been issued in 1977 because the numbers of deceased individuals close to Barry's have been disclosed from that year. Given Barry's close association with identity thieves and forgers Ayers and his wife going back to 1980 I regard it as most probable that the Ayers technique of obtaining SS#s for dead babies was most likely used to link up Barry with this number in the early 1980’s.
Pravda is more of a free press than our MSM....sad times..
Pravda will be interesting tomorrow. (wink nod)
Considering Orly has expressed great disdain for the former Soviet Union, and her love of freedom in the United States, her Irony Meter must be absolutely busted it got pinged over so hard. Its bad enough for me, and I didn’t live under communism or it’s fall like she did.
TV:”Has anyone addressed the possibility that 1890 is a typo of 1980?”
Not sure if it is spelled out in the article, but the 1890 year is the date the owner of that SS# was born, not the date it was assigned. In 1980, Obama would have been 19 years old, not newly born.
I’ve read other sources that claim that this SS# was orignally assigned in 1976-1977 and that the orignal owner of the number died soon thereafter. Obama evidently took on this SS# as his own sometime after the death of the original owner...
That's the theory that I most lean toward also.
YAAY!! :)
Thank you for this cogent, considered and helpful response.
stephenjohnbanker:”Pravda is more of a free press than our MSM....sad times.. “
I don’t know that “free press” is the proper terminology. Perhaps the better way to look at this would be to understand they encourage the denigration of the U.S. and its’ ideals.
I think this would be an example of how politics makes for strange bedfellows...
Did Catholic Social Services become a federal foster care participant BEFORE or AFTER 1983?
Did Catholic Social Services become a federal foster care participant BEFORE or AFTER 1983?
Did Catholic Social Services become a federal foster care participant BEFORE or AFTER 1983?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.