Skip to comments.Gingrich exposes Obama Russian Nuke Surrender(Newt.Org) while Santorum preaches & Romney pep talks
Posted on 03/27/2012 12:33:27 PM PDT by mitchell001
I finally get it! I finally understand how we Americans elected Barack Obama to be President in 2008. We voted for someone who was radical, inexperienced and incompetent Now the GOP citizens are ignoring the substantive propossals from Gingrich on energy, debt, education, and now national security, in favor of Santorum's pious preaching and in favor of Romney's incoherent pep talks. Go to Newt.Org and see Gingrich's assessment of Obama's open mike security giveaway to the Russians. I choose Substance over Form. Vote Newt.
Maddening isn’t it!?
NOT one candidate running has accomplished so much for the conservative cause as Gingrich. It is indeed maddening and sad. But remember we have the best of the best on our side from Art Laffer, Bud McFarland, Ollie North, Todd Palin, Chuck Norris, Rick Perry, Thomas Sowell, etc.
It’s like there is no place for a sensible thinking person who is involved to go. The media is the problem-until someone takes it on like Newt can do, we are always going to have the worse of the groups (not only for this) to be elevated to the top. It’s who you know and what you can do for them once elected. We need a full out protest over the corrupt media. They are in Obama’s agenda because they are One. I recall how the media in Virginia, did to Ollie North. It was sickening. The media has the power and even said in reports last night, that had to keep Newt out of the news or keep him off his message. They want Obama/Romney or Rick because they know their policy strengths cannot match Newt’s.
Already voted for Gingrich.
But, face it, Romney has it. It stinks on ice.
If you thought "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" was scary...just take a look at reality 2012!
Newt seems to be the only adult in the race. We need him to keep talking about things that matter, and to keep the focus on the failed Obama administration.
I won't this year either, but I'll still vote for Newt.
Yea. Protest vote. Again.
We should elect Newt but we will live to regret the fact that we are going to elect Romney.
Give it up. Good grief.
Would have been if the Newtie Tooties had got out of Ohio. Now you will have to live with that result and Romney. Whoo Boy.
Probably means more than my vote for him in the primary will mean.
I've read and heard enough from him and from the others and have seen what they all have accomplished in government when given power.
Doing the comparison math, Newt scores easy wins on all counts and *bonus* even has lots of "gravitas", once thought to be an essential requirement for a President.
The American electorate has spoken and it prefers a snake oil salesman, or the whining novice, rather than a Statesman.
We’re not going to elect Romney. They’re going to re-elect Obama.
Would you give it up-it’s like I have my own stalker.
They want Romney at any costs. They are giving us a strong chance for Obama so if it goes that way; we know where to put the blame.
Take your guy who convicted Zimemrman and go away from Newt’s thread.
You want examples of stuff you make up. Nearly every comment you make about Newt is conjecture. Making statements of conjectures as if they are facts is making things up. You have no idea what his actual motives are and you have no idea what is really in his heart and you have no idea what went on in his personal life. You obviously hate him and will do anything to make every one else hate him too. How evil!
Newt wouldn’t mess with FR. He would charge you 50 bucks for you and his mug in a photo, even though he knows he has no chance.
Sad thing that is.
I’m with Newt all the way, unless Sarah gets in
More vile conjecture!
You are a little drama queen and you make me laugh.
You want this? You can have it.
Someone has to do it, may as well be me. I will quit when you figure out that newt is the spoiler in this mess, not the savior.
Your anti- Newt posts stink....
Second he says he is against Obamacare and Romneycare, great photo op, on the steps of the Supreme Court. Three hours later he is okay to be Romney's v.p. Excuse me? We can do much better than this loser, we can support NEWT!
I say give it time. Romney is already out there, as our supposed “front runner,” committing one gaffe after another on national TV, day after day, as is Santorum, with his temper tantrums. The stuff yesterday on the Russians ....Chris Matthews was absolutely GAFAWING at Romney’s comments.
PAY ATTENTION to the media, now. They are gearing up to absoutely skewer Romeny, and he will make it totally easy for them to do.
Conservatives and the GOP really need to have their heads examined here, before we go over the cliff with Romney.
Newt is brilliant to just stay put. I believe, I truly believe he is the MOST intelligent and MOST capable candidate we have ...and time is going to prove this.
Newt today said he would accept the VP spot as well.My oh my, what ever shall we do?
Newt didn’t say it in juxtaposition with saying Romney was the worst nominee ever three hours before.
I really doesnt matter, Newt effectively killed any Chance Santorum ha, and he hiself has Zero chance, co baring a catastrophy Romney wiil ne the nominee, and I doubt he can win. There will be mor Mormonism revealed than ever before, and it will not help with the Evangelicals.
If you factor in the crooked polling places and out right fraud, Romney will have a very hard time if he loses even a few of the Evangelicals.
Sadly I predicted that none of the Original Nine would ever be President, it wasn't exactly Tongue in cheek. Barring a mirical that is beginning to look down right prophetic.
New has the unfortunate probem of age, and would be a poor choice to succed the President, not unlike Cheny, we neem someone young and vibrant who will not be to old in 8 years to pick up the mantle.
>>New has the unfortunate probem of age,
Newt is only 68.
Ronald Reagan was 69 years when he was elected.
FAIL again, Parrot.
I understand that age matters as VP, but I was not pushing him for VP.
How old would he be in 8 years? Which was the point, Charlie.
Not as old as Reagan was at the end of his presidency, Parrot.
You are beginning to look really mathematically challenged, give up while you are behind. If you think Gingrich would be a viable candidate eight years from now, you are delusional.
He’s as viable as Reagan was, Parrot.
I will bet it doesnt turn out the same way, unless you are talking about his first run.
I would vote for Newt in a New York Minute, but the reality is Newt was never going to be the Candidate, you will have to get over it like all the Palin supporters who were told to quit crying and buck up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.