Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EMPLOYERS BEWARE: This is how Muslims deceive you prior to suing you
Bare Naked islam ^ | 3/26/12 | barenakedislam

Posted on 03/27/2012 7:37:23 PM PDT by Impala64ssa

Muslim woman applies for job at McDonald’s wearing no headbag (hijab). She arrives at work the first day wearing a headbag which is prohibited. Soon she will have the litigation jihadists from CAIR filing a lawsuit against McDonalds on her behalf. The Muslim job applicant reported to CAIR-MI that she recently applied for employment at a McDonald’s restaurant in Rochester Hills, Mich. During the interview, she alleges that one of the restaurant managers told her that wearing an Islamic headbag, or hijab, would be a problem. The applicant contacted the manager within a week after the interview to inquire about possible employment and was informed that someone else was selected for the position.

“We urge McDonald’s to take immediate action to bring its hiring policies into compliance with long-established legal guidelines on reasonable religious accommodation in the workplace,” said CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid.

He noted that in 2008, CAIR-MI raised concerns with threatened McDonald’s regarding two similar incidents in which Muslim women alleged being denied employment because of hijab. Walid said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires employers to reasonably accommodate the religious practices of an employee, unless doing so would create an “undue hardship” for the employer. (How about the hardship of losing customers because they don’t want to be waited on by people who look like terrorists?)

CAIR has the cojones to pass out a booklet called “An Employer’s Guide to Islamic Religious Practices” to help corporate managers gain a better understanding of Islam and Muslims.New Religious Discrimination Manual Released


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: Michigan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cair; mcdonalds; religionofpeace
UMM, why would any "righteous" muzzie work at McDonalds? They would would put themselves in an UNCLEAN enviornment according to islamic law, working around pork products. Surely any freshman law student(even an affirmative action type) can handily get such a lawsuit dismissed.
1 posted on 03/27/2012 7:37:31 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I would go up to one, order stuff and tell them about all the pork throughout the products and now in the air.


2 posted on 03/27/2012 7:40:14 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I’d think .05% pork being added to every product should just about do the trick.

And I love it in milkshakes! Actually, since we raise our pork here, the more products we add it to - the better.


3 posted on 03/27/2012 7:41:39 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

If I see a headbag, I’ll take my business elsewhere.


4 posted on 03/27/2012 7:41:39 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Where exactly is this McD’s? I live in the area (now) and I’d love to buy a lot of burgers there.

And Fvck a bunch of muzzies...


5 posted on 03/27/2012 7:41:59 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Hmmmm......so the corporate lawyers would not suspect ethics violations for collusion between “Client victim” and CAIR counsel?


6 posted on 03/27/2012 7:41:59 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Some "unifier" in the White House, huh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Maybe they get paid time off when McRib is back?


7 posted on 03/27/2012 7:44:08 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Islam is not a religion. It is a weapon intended to take down western civilization. I think it should be outlawed.


8 posted on 03/27/2012 7:44:13 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

One of my friends made me a homemade milkshake a few weeks ago that had bacon and bourbon in it. It was actually pretty good.


9 posted on 03/27/2012 7:44:58 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson ("I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Employers should never say anything....just don’t hire them, but don’t say anything that will give them reasons to sue.


10 posted on 03/27/2012 7:46:10 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson
“One of my friends made me a homemade milkshake a few weeks ago that had bacon and bourbon in it. It was actually pretty good.”

My good friend Jack Daniels makes EVERYTHING better. And bacon adds a delightful taste, as well as a pest repellent!

11 posted on 03/27/2012 7:48:19 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

A_Former_Democrat: “so the corporate lawyers would not suspect ethics violations for collusion between “Client victim” and CAIR counsel?”

EXACTLY SO !

If the headbag wasn’t relevent for the interview, but it now it relevent for the job , it seems to me that this is a “set-up job” against the employer ~ call it what it is : LEGALIZED CIVIL ENTRAPMENT (and hyopocracy) .


12 posted on 03/27/2012 7:50:26 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

A_Former_Democrat: “so the corporate lawyers would not suspect ethics violations for collusion between “Client victim” and CAIR counsel?”

EXACTLY SO !

If the headbag wasn’t relevent for the interview, but it now it relevent for the job , it seems to me that this is a “set-up job” against the employer ~ call it what it is : LEGALIZED CIVIL ENTRAPMENT (and hyopocracy) .


13 posted on 03/27/2012 7:50:42 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

I don’t know about the bacon in a shake, but the bourbon works for me. Besides, ragheads despise alcohol just as much as they do bacon ... so either one in a shake is a good thing. LOL!


14 posted on 03/27/2012 7:51:19 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Did you read the post? The women interview without head scarves and then wear one to work. This actually happened in a very upscale NYC department store.

The only way around it is to ban all head coverings, but maybe they are afraid of being sued for that!


15 posted on 03/27/2012 7:52:25 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name
And I love it in milkshakes! Actually, since we raise our pork here, the more products we add it to - the better.

Pork fat Rules!


16 posted on 03/27/2012 7:52:44 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Hey B#$ch, maybe the hairnet that is required by HAACP laws would mess up your hair-bag.

Get over it!


17 posted on 03/27/2012 7:53:35 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

In that case, don’t hire anyone who even remotely looks Arab.


18 posted on 03/27/2012 7:53:35 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Islam is not a religion. It is a weapon intended to take down western civilization. I think it should be outlawed.

Islam is a death cult, no different than the death cult that Jim Jones led to the jungles of Guyana, the only contrast being the scale of death, Islam has racked up a far higher score in death, destruction and desolation.
19 posted on 03/27/2012 7:57:09 PM PDT by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; dfwgator
The women interview without head scarves and then wear one to work.

And yet one of the restaurant managers mentioned that a hijab would be a problem on the job. Why? He would have been better off keeping his mouth shut on the subject. Which I believe was dfwgator's point.

20 posted on 03/27/2012 7:57:31 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Install a lathe and make her work only that station.


21 posted on 03/27/2012 8:09:01 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

So this particular woman must have worn one to the interview, or asked about it.

Or the guy hired her and mentioned the problem after she was on the job.

Your post is not logical.


22 posted on 03/27/2012 8:15:43 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’s going to be/is already the ultimate outcome. I know a couple people that do not hire on that basis now. Applicants are not asked hardly any questions and NONE of ‘questionable’ nature.

“We have a TON of applications to go through considering all the people currently seeking employment so....”

In fact, they keep a backlog of applications for that very reason should courts ever become involved.

So once again, unintended consequences by the libs hurt people who are not even close to muslims. Fair? No not at all. But since the law favors the CAIR types, “...We’ll let you know” will rule the day. Thanks to the PC labor laws, employers have gotten a lot smarter about skirting the BS.


23 posted on 03/27/2012 8:17:51 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nice try. employers are required to save all applications of all applicants. If you are found hiring people with lesser qualifications, you are in trouble.


24 posted on 03/27/2012 8:23:36 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
If you are found hiring people with lesser qualifications, you are in trouble.

I thought that if you don't hire people with lesser qualifications, you are in trouble, at least that's how Affirmative Action works.

25 posted on 03/27/2012 9:04:47 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

No it is perfectly logical. You don’t know how to read words.

The woman interviewed without a hijab.

First day of work she wears one and is told they are prohibited.

When she then filed a lawsuit, she then ALLEGES that during the inteview the manager told her wearing a hijab would be a problem. In other words she LIES that such a thing was said in the interview, when it was not.


26 posted on 03/27/2012 9:34:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I guess I should give back all the hundreds of thousands of dollars I have earned as an editor, because it now seems to me that you have fabricated a completely new scenario that neither the original poster, the other freeper, nor I have envisioned. A straw scenario to prove the other freeper is logical and tell me I don’t know how to read. Oooo-kay.


27 posted on 03/27/2012 10:59:33 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

You clearly cannot read. Everything I said is in the original post. Don’t bother replying, I won’t waste any more time with you.


28 posted on 03/28/2012 12:03:22 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Islamic women working at McDonalds? Sounds like a recipe for honor killing to me.


29 posted on 03/28/2012 2:09:59 AM PDT by equaviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

May as well think ahead: Coming soon they will be suing McD’s because they don’t serve food that is halal.


30 posted on 03/28/2012 4:46:25 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson