[dfwgator]

If we lose and BHO gets his second term, we may not see any future elections.

I heard this same crap back when Clinton was running for re-election....DUmmies said the same thing about Bush.

Better to lose, and control Congress, and have a better GOP candidate for 2016, than to have Romney win, and not have a decent Republican candidate for 2016.

[hal ogen]

I take some pride in never giving this talentless individual one penny because I have never stooped so low as to see his trash films.

[Dilbert San Diego]

Well, the problem with that reasoning, is that Obama may well have at least two Supreme Court appointments in the next four years, if he’s re-elected.

If Obama is re-elected, I certainly hope it’s paired with Republicans taking the Senate in November’s elections. That’s all I can say.

[FortWorthPatriot]

"Better to lose, and control Congress, and have a better GOP candidate for 2016, than to have Romney win, and not have a decent Republican candidate for 2016."

Good point but the key phrase is "control Congress." If BHO gets reelected but we win enough seats to control both chambers of Congress, we can (to a certain degree) keep BHO in check.

But if we fail to hold the House and re-take the Senate, we'll be exactly where we are right now but at an even steeper and faster descent. And heaven help us if we lose the House.