Skip to comments.“THE MARK LEVIN SHOW”– Wednesday, March-28-2012
Posted on 03/28/2012 2:29:58 PM PDT by Fudd Fan
The Legacy Lives On! Marks Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles. --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny Welcome to The Levin Lounge
Step in and have a virtual FRink.
Marks Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation
Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles. --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny
Welcome to The Levin Lounge Step in and have a virtual FRink.
Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com!
You can call Marks show: 1-877-381-3811
tell you what, these audios of the proceedings completely prove Mark right when he wrote about the Supreme Court Justices in Men In Black. It becomes clear hearing these leftists not care a whit about the Constitution.
How can she decide where she is on any given moment?
What a maroon.
Its not ‘cause she’s old, its because she is stupid.
She should be forced to read the entire bill.
Out loud, from beginning to end with no potty breaks.
How old is that old bat anyway?
My guess is she doesn’t use the potty...just sayin’
(pretend I posted that little ROFLMAO guy here)
I didn’t see Mark at the Hands Off My Healthcare Rally :o(
I’m surprised he didn’t go...
Yeah, Big fat Beckel mocked my buddy Jennifer Stefano on THE FIVE.
He’s a disgraceful pos.
Dude, he’s fighting the damn government in a million ways, have some humility...
79 says Wiki.
I hope she doesn’t retire during 0bama.
i’ll post it later
I’ve got that in my notes.
I think they meant this bill in particular as it is written.
Hard to be humble being a Mark Levin fan dudette...
I tried to listen to that link you posted and couldn’t open it with my Mac.
What I’m saying is that he is so far so involved in the fight, that I wouldn’t expect to see him at a rally in the thick of the most momentous Supreme Court fight ever, where his firm has not only filed numerous briefs, but has had their arguments used by the Justices against the government. If it were me, I wouldn’t be able to contain myself, let alone attend a rally.
It was about the piles of minutia in the bill, each section applying to a different issue, BC, drug abuse programs, mammograms etc.
If they severed the mandatory participation clause, they were talking about the individual tax payer having no remaining recourse in the courts to get rid of each itty bitty tyrannical aspect.
I took that as an argument AGAINST severability.
How did you take it?
its gonna kill me to wait months for the answer - even though they will have voted this week and the answer is known
at least by them
the audio is there, that is where I listen.
wow, did not know that.....known....hmmmm