Posted on 03/29/2012 6:09:43 PM PDT by QT3.14
...The problem for the left is that they do not have a lot of interaction with conservatives, whose intellects are often disparaged, ideas are openly mocked, and intentions regularly questioned. Conservative ideas rarely make it onto the pages of most middle- and high-brow publications of news and opinion the left frequents. So, liberals regularly find themselves surprised when their ideas face pushback.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
I’m shocked Chrissy in the video didn’t mention if this ‘discovery’ gave him a ‘tingle’ up his leg.
I’m a high school drop out and I know its unconstitutional.
I can’t wait to see the looks on these so called “journalists” faces when this thing is deemed unconstitutional.
It will be priceless.
Stick to what you are good at Chris....licking Obama’s boots.
As do all liberals, especially those on TV. Can the liberals just give an honest statement? Not on MSNBC!
I’m pretty surprised to learn that Chris Matthews can remember how to breathe air.
That evening I may watch a network nightly news program for the first time since January 19, 2009.
I’m Canadian and I knew it would be unconstitutional.
Up till now the only thing Little Chrissie knew that was unconstitutional was keeping and bearing arms....
Had Matthews and the other so-called "progressives" understood the essential ideas of liberty expounded by Madison, Jay and Hamilton in those essays, they would not have "trouble" understanding why this mandate is "unconstitutional."
If one uses as a standard the intellectual arguments articulated in the debates of the 1787 Convention, and among the participants debating ratification of the proposed U. S. Constitution throughout the States in 1787-88, then what an embarrassing look into the mind and thought process of current Justice Kagan in some of her questions and statements!
Justice Breyer's nonsensical musings, when combined with those of Justice Kagan, should alarm every citizen who cherishes the Constitution's underlying principles, as articulated and explained by America's Founders and Framers of that Constitution's protections for liberty.
My post from another thread related to Kagan:
"Kagan: "'The exact same argument so, so that really reduces to the question of: why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion?
"'In other words, the federal government is here saying: we’re giving you a boatload of money. There are no, is no matching funds requirement. There are no extraneous conditions attached to it.
"'It’s just a boatload of federal money for you to take and spend on poor people’s healthcare. It doesn’t sound coercive to me, I have to tell you.'"
This statement tells us everything we need to know about Justice Kagan's concept of "coercive power" versus "individual liberty" and the Constitution's protections for the latter.
America's Founders viewed "government" as "coercive" by nature.
America's Founders understood that "government" creates no money, has no money, and cannot "gift" money without first "taking" it from someone--a "coercive" act in itself.
Besides, this "boatload of money" is not "federal money." It is "the People's" money, and who is naive or uninformed enough to believe that "taking" it from the people, sending it to Washington, and then doling it out to the States is an efficient way to provide "poor people's health care"????
Oh, how far we have come from the genius and wisdom which gave birth to America's Constitution, America's liberty for all, and America's prosperity and greatness!!!
I hope that these members of the Supreme Court will understand that future generations of Americans and individuals all over the world, given the new technologies which enable them to study the Founders' ideas, will judge them by the Framers' standards, not by the standards of the so-called "progressive" politicians in this Administration.
"Ideas have Consequences" (Weaver). America's Founders' ideas produced freedom, opportunity, prosperity and plenty for hundreds of millions of oppressed people.
The "progressives'" ideas of redistribution (socialism) have produced approaching tyranny and oppression, mediocrity, and want, in every society where they have been tried.
Chris, I’m pretty surprised you have the capacity to learn anything.
Surprise me when it’s a done deal. I’m not counting any chickens before they’re hatched.
Canadians, I believe, likely know more about our history and the Constitutions than our own citizens. (I lived in Canada for 3 years.)
I thought it was interesting that Harry Roid is concerned about what it means for the interstate commerce clause.
The democrats use that for a lot of things.
Canadians, I believe, likely know more about our history and the Constitutions than our own citizens. (I lived in Canada for 3 years.)
He meant Morning Constitution.
Pray for America
I’m Canadian and I knew it would be unconstitutional.
Where are you from brother?
Nice rant - many great points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.