” Breathing it in can damage lungs and cause cancers, research has shown.
I’ll bet there’s absolutely no proof of that.”
Harvard Med did a study 20 years ago, that proved second-hand smoke was harmless....just an eye irritant. It was reported once, and buried for eternity : )
posted on 03/31/2012 12:21:39 PM PDT
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
Is 2nd hand smoke the smoke that smokers exhale? I am guessing that is has been filtered through the smokers lungs but what about the smoke that burns off the end of the cigarette? That would be just regular smoke like the smoker inhales, nothing 2nd hand about that.
posted on 03/31/2012 12:33:07 PM PDT
Here is the British Medical Journal peer reviewed study of over 30,000 Californians that were non smokers with smoking spouses that proves second hand smoke has no ill health effects.
The second hand smoke claims are pure crap.
posted on 03/31/2012 1:25:31 PM PDT
(Common sense is no longer common.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson