Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans discuss reviving earmarks
Reuters ^ | Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:46pm EDT | Richard Cowan

Posted on 03/31/2012 5:28:12 PM PDT by Olog-hai

The huge federal transportation bill was in tatters in early March when Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama posed a heretical idea for breaking through gridlock in the House.

In a closed-door meeting with fellow Republicans, Rogers recommended reviving a proven legislative sweetener that became politically toxic a year ago.

Bring back earmarks, Rogers, who was first elected to Congress in 2002, told his colleagues. …

New Republican members backed by the Tea Party movement have railed against earmarks as a symbol of out-of-control government spending and unaccountable lawmakers.

Congress has another nine months to operate under an earmark ban, so discussions on lifting the ban are in their early stages, members and aides say.

But on the House side, where a splintered Republican majority is struggling to muster enough votes to pass bills, second thoughts about the earmark ban are "pretty pervasive," said a senior aide.

Rogers' remarks in the closed caucus meeting in early March were echoed by two other Republican lawmakers, Representatives Louie Gohmert and Kay Granger, according to some at the meeting.

House Speaker John Boehner, who pushed for the earmark ban, is considering forming a committee to study earmarks reforms, according to Rogers. Other sources also said that during the closed meeting, the speaker said he would consider reforms, and other leading Republicans did not shoot down the idea. …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: earmarks; gohmert; granger; kaygranger; louiegohmert; rinos
Looks like the RepubLIBcans are staging a liberal revolt. The lib media's really trying to push this narrative. (BTW, Rogers has a 50% ACU rating and 23% CAGW rating.)
1 posted on 03/31/2012 5:28:18 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I hope they are successful at returning to using earmarks, it is the the correct way to allocate money and direct it’s spending. The other way is to let the Executive Branch decide where the money is to be spent.


2 posted on 03/31/2012 5:32:27 PM PDT by stockpirate (Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican SOCIALISTelites, are Big Government socialists,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Republicans are bound and determined to give the House, Senate, and White House to the Demoncrats in November!


3 posted on 03/31/2012 5:33:15 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Washington, whose very air is corruption.

Breathe it in, breathe it in.


4 posted on 03/31/2012 5:33:27 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Time to sharpen the pitchforks and light the torches!


5 posted on 03/31/2012 5:33:50 PM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

There needs to be some Aristotelian guidance

Moderation

The ear marks must not get out of hand


6 posted on 03/31/2012 5:35:27 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
The EB has no such power. We do have separation of powers here.

I would guess that you are therefore saying that the Tea Party is wrong in opposition to earmarks?
7 posted on 03/31/2012 5:37:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Fits right in with their turn towards Romney and turn towards sleazy.


8 posted on 03/31/2012 5:37:37 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All

9 posted on 03/31/2012 5:39:44 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Stupid Party steps up to the plate....and hits it out of the park, once again.....right before nominating the Mittster....


10 posted on 03/31/2012 5:45:31 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

With Romney marching to the nomination it’s becoming more obvious by the day that the tea party is a paper tiger; ceasing to pay attention to the dead movement’s demands is fully pragmatic on their part.

Don’t blame me, I’m only the messenger.


11 posted on 03/31/2012 5:50:15 PM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

No, it’s stabbing them in the back now that they got into power. Their leftist “pragmatism” will be their undoing.


12 posted on 03/31/2012 6:02:27 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The ballot box has become a worthless lost cause.


13 posted on 03/31/2012 6:05:58 PM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Contractor fascism, right out of the operational D.C. playbook. And MandateMitt fits the bill perfectly.

And if Mandate-Mitt, isn’t the selectomatic-nominee, they’ll find away to force The Undocumented Fake, to step aside from the “democrats” side. Like suddenly, “he really is a fraud” pulled right out of the waiting files. (Or buy him off).


14 posted on 03/31/2012 6:28:35 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
I hope they are successful at returning to using earmarks, it is the the correct way to allocate money and direct it’s spending.

I agree. In the absence of earmarks, Obama's minions determine how appropriated money will be spent. And it's important to remember that, in the absence of earmarks, spending has only gone up. The whole earmark brouhaha was just boob bait for the bubbas.

15 posted on 03/31/2012 7:52:17 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ..

There are some reasons why Earmarks are good but this is great evidence why banning them slows down spending.

They cant get this popular pork bill passed without them.


16 posted on 03/31/2012 8:44:55 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

They tax us and then dole the money back out to the states in earmarks.

What garbage! Why should I pay for an earmark that goes to Nebraska and doesn’t benefit me and those in my state?

Who does my representative represent? Me, or Nebraskans?

Whose money is it? It’s MINE!


17 posted on 03/31/2012 8:54:39 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("For the sake of our party we must stand united, whoever our nominee is."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Olog-hai; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale
Both sides in the debate agree that before earmarks resurface, reforms are essential.

The problem is that the porkers stay 2 steps ahead of "reforms."

18 posted on 03/31/2012 9:29:10 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

See how they Cave,
See how they Cave,
Rogers says it is really nice,
See how he Caves,
See how he Caves.


19 posted on 03/31/2012 10:45:37 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
REFERENCE: Former Massachusetts Congressman Takes Graft to Next Level
Townhall.com ^ | January 30, 2012 | Daniel J. Mitchell
FR Posted January 30, 2012 by Kaslin

EXCERPT .......a former Massachusetts Congressman has taken graft to the next level......caught with his hand in the (federal) cookie jar and feels compelled to give up his share of the loot.Here are some excerpts from a report in the New York Times.

A former congressman who became a lobbyist has abandoned his plans to collect $90,000 from working on an energy project that he helped finance through Congress. …An apologetic Mr. Delahunt told town officials he wanted to eliminate the “black mark” created by questions of a possible financial conflict, Patrick Cannon, chairman of the Hull Light Board, said on Saturday.

Delahunt, a Democrat who retired from Congress last year, had faced criticism for the last week from legal and ethics specialists over the unusual lobbying arrangement he had struck with the town, which is seeking federal help to build an offshore wind energy plant at a cost of more than $60 million. While in Congress, Mr. Delahunt earmarked $1.7 million for the same project, and he was to be paid 80 percent of his monthly consulting fees out of that same pot of money. …Mr. Delahunt and executives at his firm did not respond to e-mails Saturday seeking further comment on the decision.

Wow. For all intents and purposes, Congressman Delahunt directly pilfered the Treasury for personal gain.This is amazing. But what’s remarkable isn’t that he stole money. After all, the federal budget is largely a big scam enabling various groups of people to obtain unearned loot.The noteworthy thing about this story is that he didn’t launder the money.

In most cases, politicians do earmarks as part of a corrupt quid pro quo. They direct money to a certain group of beneficiaries and, in exchange, get campaign contributions from both the lobbyists who facilitated the deal and the interest groups that receive the taxpayer funds. But Delahunt cut out one of the middlemen. He created an earmark, and then became one of the lobbyists pocketing the cash.

Money is still being wasted. Delahunt is still a lobbyist. Government is still too big. And corruption is still rampant.And if you think the former Congressman is genuinely apologetic….well, please get in touch with me. I’m selling a bridge in Brooklyn and need a gullible buyer – i.e., the kind of person who doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with this unseemly example of sleaze.

===================================================

REFERENCE The report said 248 of 435 House members used their positions for their family’s gain; Watchdog group says Cong Rob Andrews (D-NJ) donated more than $100,000 in campaign funds to area theaters that hosted performances by his daughter, Josie.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) also said Andrews directed $8,700 in political donations and $1.5 million in federal earmarks to his wife’s employer, the Rutgers Law School in Camden where she is associate dean of enrollment.

The organization said Andrews donated $68,350 to the Walnut Street Theater in Philadelphia during the 2010 election cycle. The same theater got $25,000 in the 2008 cycle. Josie, 17, is an aspiring entertainer. Andrews’ wife, Camille, is a trustee there.

In 2008, Andrews’ campaign donated $6,500 to the Prince Music Theater and $5,000 to the Rock School of Dance in Philly. The Broadway Theater in Pitman got $391. The watchdog group said Josie appeared at the Prince and Broadway and trained at the Rock School.

CREW said Andrews’ campaign spent $119 for a meal at Six Flags Great Adventure on a day Josie performed there. CREW’s study did not cover campaign spending in 2011 when Andrews used political donations for a family trip to Scotland and four trips to Los Angeles that coincided with recording sessions for Josie. Andrews reimbursed the campaign for more than $13,000 for the Scotland trip.

LAUGH BREAK A spokesperson said Cong Andrews is proud to support the arts and all campaign expenses are disclosed and in accordance with the law. (That’s because Congress passes these laws.)

CREW’s executive director, Melanie Sloan, told the Courier-Post’s Jim Walsh that in general spending on things related to lawmakers’ families “reinforces the widely held view that members of Congress are more interested in enriching themselves than in public service.” Andrews is a 12-term congressman from South Jersey.

20 posted on 04/01/2012 7:52:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All
POLS ENRICHING THEMSELVES WITH EARMARKS--ANOTHER WAY SELF-SERVING POLS PILFER GOVT MONEY:

CONNECTING THE DOTS How much in federal earmarks did Cong Wexler give his non-profit "peace" (gag) organization?

Ex Cong Robert Wexler (Dem-Fla)---already an admitted liar who falsified govt records to get into Congress--- is now president of the DC-based non-profit S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East (gag) Peace.

======================================================

BACKSTORY Robert Wexler was a Democratic member of the US House representing Florida's 19th congressional district, from 1997 until his resignation on January 3, 2010.

In July 2008, it was revealed that Wexler claimed his mother- in-law's home in Delray Beach as his official residence (though he was listed on the House roll as "D-Boca Raton"), but lives in a Maryland suburb for most of the year.

Edward J. Lynch, a Republican running for Wexler's congressional seat, researched Wexler's living arrangements and took his argument to Fox News. "The house he lists on his voter registration is his in-laws' house, in a gated 55-and-older community," Lynch said. "Legally, he can't move back with children under 18."

After Wexler was confronted about the allegation, he stated that his mother-in-law does own the house in Delray Beach. But he also said he stays there when in Florida which, according to his office is, on average, about twice a month.

As a putative Florida resident, Wexler did not pay personal income tax, and his vehicles were also registered in that state, despite his near-permanent residency in Maryland and the Washington metropolitan area.Wexler, born in 1961, did not personally meet the age requirements for his mother-in-law's senior community. Wexler later obtained a separate address within Palm Beach County.

Throughout his tenure in Congress, Congressman Wexler has been an outspoken advocate for the unbreakable bond between the United States and Israel, and a leading proponent of Israel's right to self-defense and the need for a just and comprehensive resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. He has traveled on numerous congressional delegations to the Middle East and met with the leaders of Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait, Turkey, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Morocco, and Oman.

At President Clinton's invitation, he was the only member of the House of Representatives present during the signing of the Wye River Peace Agreement. In addition, Wexler was one of two Congressmen to travel to the International Court of Justice at the Hague to oppose the Palestinian case against Israel's construction of a security barrier.

Congressman Wexler served as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Europe of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and as a member of the Middle East Subcommittee. Wexler worked to strengthen the transatlantic alliance, build security and economic bonds with the European Union and the nations of Europe, and help guide the economic and political development of the former Soviet States.

Wexler was an outspoken advocate of impeaching VP Cheney and Pres Bush.

==========================================

GOOD COP BAD COP ACT During Wexler's 2008 campaign, Wexler agreed to receive JStreetPAC’s endorsement and financial support and lost funding from Washington PAC as a result. Morris Amitay, the head of the ardently pro-Israel "Washington PAC," made clear to candidates seeking support from his pro-Israel PAC that he does not view favorably those who receive funds from the outatively anti-Israel JStreet PAC. Amitay said “There’s a striking resemblance between the people they support and the anti-Israel Hall of Fame.”

PEACE (gag) PARTNERS American Cong Wexler in abject fealty to Israeli leader Netanyahu.

==========================================

Cong Wexler was instrumental in getting Turkey increased foreign aid to achieve Mideast (gag) Peace. While in Congress, Wexler founded the Caucus on U.S.-Turkish Relations and served on the Congressional Study Group on Turkey.

Wexler was co-founder of the Caucus on U.S.-Turkish Relations, the Taiwan Caucus, and the Indonesia Caucus. He was also an active member of the India Caucus and the Serbia Caucus. In addition, Wexler served as a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee and the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property.

TURKEY received $21 billion economic/military US foreign aid The US Dept of state reported Dec 2011 that as part of the cooperative effort to further Turkish economic and military self-reliance, the United States has loaned and granted Turkey more than $7 billion in economic aid and more than $14 billion in military assistance over several years.

21 posted on 04/01/2012 8:05:13 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Olog-hai; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale

Everyone should watch the old movie “The Great McGinty”

Machine Ward Boss: WHAT reform party? I AM reform party!!!!


22 posted on 04/01/2012 10:22:53 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Choke......GASP!!


23 posted on 04/01/2012 10:24:51 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Wexler is one of the most evil pols out there.


24 posted on 04/01/2012 10:27:28 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Condor51

You got that right——Wexler was obsessed with getting his filthy hands on federal dollars....lied through his friggin’ teeth to get it.

God knows how much he helped himself to.

In addition to foreign aid trillions, there are zillions of federal agencies jetstreaming tax dollars to these Mideast hellholes-—ubder the guise of (gag) peace programs.

The zillions being sucked out of our country is nauseating——as Americans struggle to survive.


25 posted on 04/01/2012 11:16:17 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Wexler is gone now. He resigned as of Jan 2010 after his phony FL residency was outed by Bill O'Reilly.

That being said, there's no telling how much he stashed away from stolen US funds, kickbacks, and BS 'contracts' to his friends and relatives.

26 posted on 04/01/2012 11:28:16 AM PDT by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Yes, Wexler’s gone-—but no doubt he’s still on the dole-—sucking off the backs of struggling Americans.

Wonder how many “bombs” Wexler planted in the zillions of Mideast federal funding programs (over and above “foreign aid” trillions)———that go off like clockwork to keep him and the fam well-financed w/ federal tax dollars.


27 posted on 04/01/2012 11:46:13 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Condor51

Wexler was one of the worst we ever had. No collecting six figures off the poor taxpayers....God only knows how much he stole for himself.


28 posted on 04/01/2012 12:25:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Liz
The reason I said Wexler is 'gone now' is that to me it seems like only 'yesterday' that he was exposed as the fraud he was and was going to resign.

Jeez, maybe I AM getting old -- Yikes!

29 posted on 04/02/2012 4:43:02 AM PDT by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Condor51; stephenjohnbanker

Another disgusting fraud is Lieberman (D-Conn)......he lied his way into office——worst of all, he lied on the backs of the innocent unborn.

This stoopnagle told Conn voters he was “pro-life”-—but the minute he was voted in, he was on his knees, sucking up to pro-aborts. Lying Lieb voted for infanticide (p/b abortion) six times.

He now says he’s retiring..... b/c there’s no chance this liar would ever be voted back in.

Plato was right-—any citizen merely entertaing the idea of running for public office should be automatically disqualified.


30 posted on 04/02/2012 5:04:19 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Condor51

” Plato was right-—any citizen merely entertaing the idea of running for public office should be automatically disqualified”

So was W.C. Fields..

” I would never join a country club, that would have me as a member”


31 posted on 04/02/2012 8:20:13 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson