Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I thought this would be a good entertainment break if anyone wants one, from the media spin of the Fluke/Martin/??? election year media circus.

While the movie is about a criminal trial, it can also apply to the media. The movie is a good reminder that while the media does not care at all about who it destroys, there are real lives at stake in who it chooses to put on trial, and the rest of us should care.

I find it fortunate that we live in a time where bloggers and the internet can pick apart an offical pre-packaged story and get closer to the truth, like these jurors.

The whole film is available at the link.

1 posted on 04/01/2012 8:48:33 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Vince Ferrer

It seemed to me, watching 12 angry men, that Fonda raised the level of proof from beyond a reasonable doubt to beyond a possibility. I thought the kid was guilty using the reasonable doubt standard.


2 posted on 04/01/2012 8:56:45 PM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

Yes, it was propaganda. Fonda was always typecast as the enlightened voice of liberal reason. Where would we have been without him to teach us correct thought?


4 posted on 04/01/2012 9:12:49 PM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

A terrible movie. So many stereotypes and caricatures; it is enough to make you sick or make you laugh, depending on your mood. Its not propaganda, it is Hollywood ultra left bias.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 9:23:01 PM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

For wrestling with issues of justice, I have always preferred “Judgment at Nuremburg”.


9 posted on 04/01/2012 9:31:19 PM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

I am all for jury nullification when appropriate - either way.

Protect the public and sound western ethics will guide any American-American jurist. Our elitists (those making too many laws and unconstitutional laws, at that) are corrupt and insane. I trust me more than them and I can talk and try to persuade a jury of my peers. I’ve done it.


11 posted on 04/01/2012 9:44:18 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

Some here don’t like it, but I think that it is really a good film. True it is liberal propaganda, but still it shows how one man can make a difference by persuasion.

The ending is fantastic. The jurors don’t know each others names. In the last scene the Fonda character and another introduce themselves.

Then, the Fonda character walks out into the crowded side walk and become one with the people again.

This shows that we all have a civic duty.

I am pretty sure that the image of Fonda walking out into the street after fulfilling his duty was alluded to by Reagan in the Farewell speech:

“And how stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous, more secure, and happier than it was 8 years ago. But more than that: After 200 years, two centuries, she still stands strong and true on the granite ridge, and her glow has held steady no matter what storm. And she’s still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.

We’ve done our part. And as I walk off into the city streets, a final word to the men and women of the Reagan revolution, the men and women across America who for 8 years did the work that brought America back. My friends: We did it. We weren’t just marking time. We made a difference. We made the city stronger, we made the city freer, and we left her in good hands. All in all, not bad, not bad at all.

And so, goodbye, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.”


12 posted on 04/01/2012 9:50:07 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

There’s a pretty good Russian remake of the movie a few years back, simply titled “12”. In that case the innocent teen was “Caucasian” (i.e. Muslim from the Caucasus region).


15 posted on 04/01/2012 10:26:43 PM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

One of the great things about this movie, that I don’t think is so common nowadays is the class of actors involved. There was an excellent remake done in 1997, with Jack Lemmon and George C. Scott, and the rest of the cast also top quality. In some ways it is better than the 1957 version. Apparently there was an even earlier version done for television, although I don’t know if this was preserved.


16 posted on 04/01/2012 11:41:23 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

Typical liberal movie (Henry Fonda) where all the white men (except Fonda) are racists.


19 posted on 04/02/2012 1:58:30 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!-Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson