Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon focused on resolving F-35 software issues
Reuters ^ | Reuters

Posted on 04/01/2012 9:20:55 PM PDT by U-238

The Pentagon is focused on resolving complex software issues on the new Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 fighter jet, even as it struggles to drive down costs, a top Pentagon official said on Friday, noting that software failures could "bring us to our knees."

Air Force Major General John Thompson, the No. 2 official in charge of the huge multi-nation warplane development program, said the latest restructuring of the program had given officials enough resources and time to address future challenges.

"Both the hardware and the software issues that we're addressing are all within the realm of being resolved," Thompson told reporters on Friday, noting that Pentagon plans to postpone orders for 179 for five years would allow more time for development before production shifts into high gear in 2019.

He said the F-35 program office, the military services, and Lockheed were working together to reduce costs.

The Pentagon told lawmakers on Thursday that the projected cost to develop, build, operate and maintain the plane for 55 years rose by 8.6 percent to $1.51 trillion from $1.38 trillion in the latest Pentagon estimate.

Thompson said the program was also stepping up work on the 24 million lines of code needed to fly and operate the new warplane and associated ground-based equipment, such as simulators, Thompson said.

"The complexity there gives us pause," he said. "We know we can go fix the mechanical engineering issues associated with structural problems. We're very confident in that. But in terms of fusing together that many lines of code into actual warfighting capability, we realize that could bring us to our knees if it doesn't work."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; dod; f35; jointstrikefighter; lockheedmartin; miltech; navair; northop; pentagon; software; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2012 9:21:00 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: U-238; a fool in paradise

You must know by now that there is no computer software without bugs. Think about it next time you board that shiny Boeing aircraft!


2 posted on 04/01/2012 9:25:04 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Its always fixed.


3 posted on 04/01/2012 9:27:04 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: U-238

“Its always fixed.”

No, it isn’t. Sometimes big software projects are so bad, they’re eventually abandoned, especially when the government is involved. See the FBI’s Virtual Case File software project that was so bad, they just gave up and abandoned it, after spending $170 million. Mega-software projects entail tremendous complexity and risk, and it doesn’t always pay off.


4 posted on 04/01/2012 9:44:07 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
Usually, when planes start falling from the sky or their is a major malfunction in the cockpit its a sign there is a software problem.Pilots want their machine to be 100 percent condition.
5 posted on 04/01/2012 9:46:57 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

this will not be abandoned. all parties want to see a happy ending.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 9:49:54 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

It does not look favorably on the manufacturer or the Pentagon to have their planes flying with problems. Remember, they are selling these planes to other nations.Its best to double check their work and get it right the first time.


7 posted on 04/01/2012 9:51:35 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
Of course they want a happy ending. This is the premier plane of the 21st century and a cornstone of the USAF,USMC and many other countries air forces.They have already started training at Eglin AFB
8 posted on 04/01/2012 9:58:01 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: U-238
I hope Microsoft is not doing the software.
9 posted on 04/01/2012 10:39:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Usually, when planes start falling from the sky or their(sic) is a major malfunction in the cockpit its(sic) a sign there is a software problem.

BS

Pilots want their machine to be 100 percent condition.

Apparently you've never served in tactical aviation. Aircraft are rarely, if ever, at "100 percent". You might want to learn about up gripes and down gripes.

10 posted on 04/01/2012 10:50:21 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I agree. Microsoft is not a good choice. It looks like Lockheed doing the software


11 posted on 04/01/2012 11:12:42 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This is interesting:

“one of the largest and most complex” software development efforts in Pentagon history


12 posted on 04/01/2012 11:17:14 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Kelly Johnson rule should apply: “Be quick, be quiet, and be on time.”


13 posted on 04/01/2012 11:19:52 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: U-238

From what I’ve read, the F-35 has over 10 million lines of code. By comparison, the software of the F-22, which was considered to be far beyond that of any other combat aircraft in the world, had only 5 million lines of code. The F/A-18 Super Hornet has about 1.5 million lines.


14 posted on 04/02/2012 12:46:21 AM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Could be MicroSoft.. it takes 24 million lines of code to run Microsoft Word. (sarc).


15 posted on 04/02/2012 2:23:53 AM PDT by maddog55 (OBAMA: Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
"0" lines of code for flight operation:


16 posted on 04/02/2012 2:28:51 AM PDT by maddog55 (OBAMA: Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I guess those were tough to fly, but has always been my favorite to look at.


17 posted on 04/02/2012 2:36:21 AM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: U-238
 
/usr/local/src/f-35 # make clean_     
 


18 posted on 04/02/2012 2:47:50 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I believe that particular aircraft is now a TARGET DRONE.

‘nuff said ;)


19 posted on 04/02/2012 3:43:26 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I would’ve thought he command to jettison all stores would be more complex. Go figure.


20 posted on 04/02/2012 3:45:36 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson