I remember my disappointment at President GHW Bush when he signed “campaign finance reform” saying he didn’t think it was Constitutional - but that was for the SCOTUS to decide.
No bonehead - we elect a President with a particular viewpoint in order that he NOT sign legislation which he thinks is unconstitutional.
posted on 04/02/2012 8:39:27 AM PDT
(Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
My husband and I were discussing this just yesterday. They're all sworn in to office under oath, an oath to uphold the Constitution. If SCOTUS finds Obamacare unconstitutional, why are they not penalized, in any way, for violating the Constitution?
posted on 04/02/2012 8:45:28 AM PDT
(Barack has a memory like a steel trap; it's a gift ~ Michelle Obama)
I remember my disappointment at President GHW Bush when he signed campaign finance reform saying he didnt think it was Constitutional - but that was for the SCOTUS to decide.
As do I. Frankly, I was ready to support his impeachment for that, not for the reasons the insane leftists had, but because he knowingly signed legislation he thought was unconstitutional.
posted on 04/04/2012 3:01:29 PM PDT
(2 goals this year: (1) S##tcan Obamacare; (2) S##tcan Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson