Skip to comments.Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law
Posted on 04/02/2012 12:46:07 PM PDT by Deo volente
President Obama, employing his strongest language to date on the Supreme Court review of the federal health care overhaul, cautioned the court Monday against overturning the law -- while repeatedly saying he's "confident" it will be upheld.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The lawless, belligerent black man coercing the Highest Court in the Nation, publicly, and
getting away with that too. Impeachment is option 1. Three good generals is option 2.
no way would Kagan do that IMHO she is a one minded view and going by what she said by trying to help the defense in their presentation I;d say she made her mind up way before she heard thew arguments for and against.
If he loses on Nov 6, he will immediately commence his race riots, declare martial law and Jan 20, 2013 will just be another day in his USSA
This Motherhugging Kenyan Socialist Muslim Marxist Crack Smoking D**k Sucker (also known as President Barack Obama) knows full well that Judicial Review, which is their precise function, has been the job of the Supreme Court since the country was founded.
Unprecedented???!? This is the use of Hitler's Big Lie premise!!!
Let me give you a feew precedents to the Supreme Court "overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress"
Marbury v. Madison was the first instance in which a law passed by Congress was declared unconstitutional. The decision greatly expanded the power of the Court by establishing its right to overturn acts of Congress, a power not explicitly granted by the Constitution. Initially the case involved Secretary of State James Madison, who refused to seat four judicial appointees although they had been confirmed by the Senate.
And that's just two examples. There are more.
Polly, I'm beginning to hear that view, although I must admit that I've shut it out for a long time now. I still detest Romney with a passion, but a few good folks around here are making a very logical case for him being the "lesser of two evils."
I agree, and this goes for everything we as Americans desire ...it really doesn't matter to this administration for they have no fear of Congress acting and they know they can control the populace....or use it to their advantage.
We are in far more than troubling times....it does seem the levers are pulled and the Obama train will continue to destroy this country as we've known it to be.
I do not see the election changing the trajectory....Romney certainly has no skills required to turn this ship...he'll simply put it on another tract but 'heading the same direction' as the Globalist Elitist desire. He's one of them.
The only chance we had was with Newt and they've all but destroyed his chances....a slim chance at best.
Perhaps you are on to something as she has survived pancreatic cancer longer than most.
OT: he is spewing his BS now on TV. Major barf alert.
Forgive me, but I don’t see where he “threatened” anything. He made an ass of himself, especially as a lawyer who should know better (I’m not a lawyer, btw), but what “threat” was there? What were the words he used that were “threatening” anyone?
I read a great quote on another message board the other day: “Obama knows as much about the Constitution as those hominids knew about the monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey....”
If after this threat the USSC upholds this law, then America has officially become a dictatorial banana republic.
Excellent point. Many of those so called “progressive” types think of conservatives as being mentally inferior (my IQ’s over 150), which is, of course, to our advantage.
Here’s a link to a piece that was actually published in the New York Times, that scientifically refutes hateful claim going around when George W. Bush was in office, that he was a “moron.”
Just a reminder to anyone who is interested in the subject — this is NOT Andrew Jackson’s Supreme Court.
Inuendo . . . .
If you notice Obama labeled Ryans budget a trojan horse. This is an effort marginalize/negate language. Im rubber, your glue, whatever you say... (you get the idea) These are the linguistic parlor games of the left targeted at his pea brained base.
>> If enacted, I will not comply <<
Same here. Time for some not-so-civil disobedience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.