Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These Pentagon guys are stuck in another era. They could have used some honest-to-goodness creative thought in promoting these things. I think they're just using the exorbitant price to scare off the Russians simply as a warfare tactic. < sarcasm off >
1 posted on 04/03/2012 2:27:22 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lbryce
It would seem to a novice such as myself that oxygenation/compression on the pilots had been worked/sweated/bled out some decades ago. Why start from scratch?
2 posted on 04/03/2012 2:36:16 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
These costs are not the costs to buy the planes, it is the total lifecycle cost. Things like the manpower to maintain them, the fuel, decades worth of tires, things like that.

Yes, it's a big number but lifecycle costs are always big numbers for every program. Here's the dirty secret: nobody knows how to calculate lifecycle cost (what will fuel cost in 2025 anyway?) so it's pretty much an educated guess. It's all in the assumptions made. One thing that is generally true, though: People are the biggest cost. You have to train them, pay them, feed them, etc. So if the JSF has a similar maintenance crew size as other aircraft, it likely the lifecycle cost will be on of the same magnitude, barring some crazy difference in, say, fuel costs.

3 posted on 04/03/2012 5:06:28 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson