Flying car a 'step closer': Terrafugia (Update)

http://www.physorg.com ^ | 04-03-2012 | by Andrew Beatty

[Red Badger]

The prototype "Transisition" car plane. Massachusetts-based firm Terrafugia said their production prototype "Transition" car-plane had completed an eight-minute test flight, clearing the way for it to hit the market within a year.

Terrafugia Inc. prototype flying car, dubbed the Transition, travels down a street with its wings folded.

A major hurdle to production of the Transition was removed recently when FAA granted the company a waiver to weight restrictions.

The Transition has two seats, four wheels and wings that fold up so it can be driven like a car, and flew at 1,400 feet for eight minutes during the first test on March 23, 2012.

http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/flying-car-soaring-air-test-flight-article-1.1054796

[longtermmemmory]

what do the others look like?

the only way this market will increase is to simplify controls beyond the stick into resembling a video game.

[2harddrive]

Is this a HOAX? It looks like it has neither a propeller, nor a jet engine, so what POWERS it?

[BrewingFrog]

Looks like a pusher prop behind the passenger compartment.

[the_devils_advocate_666]

The propeller is behind the cockpit near the rear of the airplane/car.

[the_devils_advocate_666]

[pabianice]

This vehicle is a fanciful joke. They claim they are putting into production a vehicle that can climb to 1400 feet (traffic pattern altitude) and fly for eight minutes. Look. I fly for a living and am as excited as anyone else about the prospect of a real roadable airplane. This isn’t it. It has yet to climb above pattern altitude, land in a cross-wind, or recover from a spin. It has zero crash survivability as a car. It carries less than a Cessna 150. I applaud the balls it takes to try and market something like this, but the truth is it is wholly unworkable and will be bought by a few rich people as a toy. What is needed is an LSA that sells for less than $60,000.

[Myrddin]

Pusher prop to avoid asymmetric thrust. The "safe" "H" tail approach make it hard to yaw into a spin. Certainly a decent start in the right direction. My next concern is fuel costs. The book "Stick and Rudder" goes into some nice detail regarding the ideal design for a "safe" to fly plane.

[dblshot]

Bet it will have to pay road use taxes plus FAA taxes.

[goseminoles]

But does it have airbags??

[paul51]

They probably said the same thing about the first car, plane, bike, etc. You have to walk before you run

[He'sComingBack!]

Been waiting on Moller International since 1985....the “Tucker Torpedo” of our time.

[ExCTCitizen]

The two-seater craft, which has the rounded features of a Fiat 500 and collapsible wings, is on presale for $279,000 and some 100 vehicles have already been ordered.

jeez....if I'm going to spend $279,000 for a 2 seater car....I'll buy a Ferrari....

If it was the size of an Ford Excursion (that'll seat a family), I'd buy it!!

[taildragger]

This vehicle is a fanciful joke. They claim they are putting into production a vehicle that can climb to 1400 feet (traffic pattern altitude) and fly for eight minutes. Look. I fly for a living and am as excited as anyone else about the prospect of a real roadable airplane. This isn’t it. It has yet to climb above pattern altitude, land in a cross-wind, or recover from a spin. It has zero crash survivability as a car. It carries less than a Cessna 150. I applaud the balls it takes to try and market something like this, but the truth is it is wholly unworkable and will be bought by a few rich people as a toy. What is needed is an LSA that sells for less than $60,000.

A bit of an armchair aerodynamacist on this end, I try to be gracious but I am having trouble here. Frontal area, parasite drag of the gear, the weight, and the almost Seabee like booms and if you are really schooled you will know what that did to pitching moments as it went faster.

But your line on the 60k LSA, the answer is a breakthrough in parts count, lower weight, and maybe even low end performance for low time pilots...

Ergo the Facetmobile...

http://www.eaa.org/experimenter/articles/2010-01_facetmobile.asp

[cuban leaf]

Meh. This one is a LOT more practical. Unfortunately, it’s awfully expensive: http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-04-dutch-car.html

Watch it in the video. It’s not the one pictured there.

It’s slicker than snot!

[Names Ash Housewares]

An ugly aircraft and car all in one! LOL

Niche market.

And of course, the average Joe and Jane are still going to have to have serious flight training. It’s not going to be “The Jetsons” without serious automation and a very high degree of safety.

[Jeff Chandler]

.

.

.

.

[Oztrich Boy]

[Tallguy]

Unguarded prop. Yeah, that’ll pass muster with the safety nannies!

Looks like an updated version of the old “Aerocar”.