Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's High-Tech Military Threat
Commentary Magazine ^ | 4/1/2012 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 04/03/2012 6:57:48 PM PDT by U-238

President Barack Obama said during the visit of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping in February that “we welcome China’s peaceful rise [and] we believe that a strong and prosperous China is one that can help bring stability and prosperity to the region and the world.” Few presidents have made statements so stunningly disingenuous as this. For as he was speaking, Obama was presiding over a shift in military doctrine whose central tenet is that China is, and will be, the main military threat to the United States for at least the next generation.

Weeks earlier, in November 2011, the Pentagon conducted an unusual rollout of a new military unit called the Air Sea Battle Office. Three senior officers briefed reporters on what until then had been a secret program known as the Air Sea Battle Concept. The concept calls for the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps to integrate forces and other capabilities to defeat what the Pentagon has labeled “anti-access and area denial weapons”—high-technology arms that can prevent or deter the United States military from operating in certain areas.

What made the briefing unusual was the vague and confusing language the officials used to describe the unit’s intentions. When pressed on the question of whom the initiative was targeting, one official responded, “The concept isn’t about a specific actor; it’s about countering anti-access, area-denial capabilities.” While the Department of Defense relies on its ability to dodge sensitive matters in public, this was by its own standards an impressive display of ambiguity.

(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; eastasia; militarydoctrine; pacificocean; pentagon; pla

1 posted on 04/03/2012 6:57:58 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: U-238

China's J-20 Stealth Fighter
2 posted on 04/03/2012 7:13:08 PM PDT by FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238
After Russia gets all they want from us via the Flex-Pres, I'm sure evrything will be just fine.


3 posted on 04/03/2012 7:38:41 PM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs

The J-20 is using 20 year old technology. In a match up with a F-22, the F-22 would come out victorious.Its a reversed engineered F-117 that was shot down over Serbia.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12266973
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2011/01/legacy-of-vega-31.html


4 posted on 04/03/2012 7:50:48 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: U-238
“In the mid-2000s, the United States discovered that China was working on a program to develop anti-satellite weapons involving precision-guided missiles capable of hitting satellites in orbit and ground-based lasers that could blind or disrupt satellites in space. (Satellite warfare had been discussed in Chinese military writings as early as 1997, but evidence of actual programs did not surface until around 2006.) Still, many benign-China military analysts sought to play down China’s technical prowess. But they were embarrassed in January 2007, when China blasted a weather satellite into orbit with a ground-based anti-satellite missile.”

(Note: I believe the phrase “into orbit” in the above paragraph is a typo and should read “in orbit;” indicating the “weather satellite” was a target hit by the “ground-based anti-satellite missile.”)
_______________

A long but very interesting and sobering article. Thx ...it was well worth the read! Looks like Newt's concerns about the U.S. losing the race for space were not as far fetched as some would have us believe.

5 posted on 04/03/2012 7:56:18 PM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/asat.htm
6 posted on 04/03/2012 8:05:05 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: U-238

You basically have no clue at all.

J-20 and F-117 is a world apart.

Even the stealth coating of F-117 is useless for J-20 since the later is optimized for super-sonic whilst the coating of F-117 will simply corrupt at super-sonic due to wave shock and heat.

Bury your head in the sand will make J-20 go away.

Actually F-22 is 40 year old tech and basically following the design concept of Russian’s 1960 era MiG-25.


7 posted on 04/03/2012 9:46:34 PM PDT by freegame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freegame

I am not going to argue with you for something I did not say. You did not bother to read the links.


8 posted on 04/03/2012 10:11:32 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freegame

Bother somone else.


9 posted on 04/03/2012 10:12:00 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: U-238

You basically have no clue at all.

J-20 and F-117 is a world apart.

Even the stealth coating of F-117 is useless for J-20 since the later is optimized for super-sonic whilst the coating of F-117 will simply corrupt at super-sonic due to wave shock and heat.

Bury your head in the sand will make J-20 go away.

Actually F-22 is 40 year old tech and basically following the design concept of Russian’s 1960 era MiG-25.


10 posted on 04/03/2012 11:59:30 PM PDT by freegame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: U-238

I think the author of the article you linked is just as amatuerish as you thats why I like to point the obvious out.


11 posted on 04/03/2012 11:59:31 PM PDT by freegame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freegame

All I can say Bill Gertz is a very good author and has several best selling books under his belt. Secondly, If this a way of getting me angry its not going to work. Work on somebody else.


12 posted on 04/04/2012 12:03:17 AM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: U-238

BTTT!


13 posted on 04/22/2012 12:05:04 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Semi-relevant re: PLAAF obtaining "secrets" for J-20 development.

B-2 stealth bomber engineer jailed for 32 years after selling military secrets to China
14 posted on 04/22/2012 5:10:23 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Bill Gertz is an excellent reporter.


15 posted on 04/22/2012 5:44:56 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs

Stealing the technology Americans won’t steal.


16 posted on 04/23/2012 6:16:19 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Someone needs to keep a list of these soft on China policy people and watch for them in the Romney camp. If Rice is back it will be bad news.


17 posted on 04/23/2012 6:36:54 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson