Skip to comments.Pelosi: ĎIím Predicting Six-to-Three in Favorí for Health Care Ruling
Posted on 04/04/2012 11:16:54 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday shes predicting a six-to-three Supreme Court ruling in favor of President Barack Obamas health care overhaul.
I have confidence that if were talking about the law of the land and our compliance with it that we will be OK, Pelosi said during a private event at the Paley Center for Media in New York.
Right now there are over 80 million people who are benefiting from the bill, the California Democrat added. We cant roll that back, so we have to find a way to keep it.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
I wonder if she had a leak as well?
I never really thought about leaks from the Supreme Court, but you know the top dogs probably do know before big rulings come down.
The vote was leaked to her on April 1...by Scalia.
I seriously doubt it. She’s just an idiot who spouts incorrect bullshit all of the time.
6-3 in favor?
On what continent?
On what planet?
Pelosi is making a funny!
Never ever underestimate the ability of the SCOTUS to betray the Constitution.
Not only is she nuts but where does she get the 80 million figure from? Will anyone call her on it?
Seems like BS to me.
She predicted the Dems would retain teh House, easily, in 2010 also.......
Unfortunately, this vote wouldn’t surprise me :(
After all, othe best arguements against this outrageous law, by the best minds, focuses on the Individual Mandate issue?
But, the most serious, impossible provision therein is that the law prevents USA citizens from purchasing personal health care, directly, with their own money ?????!!!!!!?????!!!
In other words, it enables USG to decide whether citizens have the right to _be_ healed; whether they are required to shut up and die when USG decides the treatment for their terminal health issue isn’t provided, ie., allowed. Neither We the People, nor the doctors are even allowed to choose a treatment if USG decides the procedure isn’t covered (allowed). Again, this is even if the people want to use their own money!
Duh, is all I can say anymore.
I was wondering the same thing.. where she got the 80 mil figure.. not sure of my math, but would that not be like 1 in 4 people benefiting?
I have Pelosi for years. This baby killing which will say anything that pops into her head, the truth is not a factor.
A different kind of leak.
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining, Senator.
Pelosi never read it, had to pass it to find out what was
in it, but “they” wrote it in an ironclad way? You can’t
hardly make this stuff up.
No one is leaking anything to anyone as no one is acting in any particulate manner that would either show total vindication or abstract defeat.
Why would any Democrat get out there and make a prediction only to look like idiots? Why would Obama get out there and threaten the court if he knew he won?
Ah, the Talking Points Zombie Hag (TPZH) vomits out the latest meme, before she's reconnected to her docking bay.
-- Ben Stein
Well if Obama knew he lost then he would attack them.
Also I think they know he overplayed his hand when he challenged the court as unelected. So now they have to play make nice. The plan was to convince Kennedy to switch sides, but it may have backfired. Also Obama did say when the Supreme Court over tur....then he corrected himself. So He may actually know.
Now they are going to spin like it’s so obvious that it will be a 7-3 decision in support of the law.
what makes you say that?