Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Paul Ryan speech that is sparking VP buzz
Washington Examiner ^ | April 4, 2012 | Charlie Spiering

Posted on 04/04/2012 12:48:09 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike

Paul Ryan took the stage last night in Wisconsin to introduce Mitt Romney and thank supporters ahead of his victory speech. Conservatives reacted favorably, sparking speculation that the speech was a trial balloon for Ryan as a Vice President candidate for Romney.

Ryan challenged Obama for his "broken promises" reminding voters that he would try to divide Americans because he could not run on his record.

"I seem to remember him saying that he was going to be a uniter, not a divider," Ryan said. "Frankly this is one and the worst of his broken promises. We do not need a campaigner-in-chief, we need a commander-in-chief we need a leader that America deserves."

"The presidency is bigger than this. He was supposed to be bigger than this." Ryan continued, "We need solutions, not excuses. We need a president who takes the lead in not one that spreads the blame. We need someone who appeals to our dreams and aspirations, not to our fears and anxieties. We as Americans deserved to choose what kind of country we want and what kind of people we want to be."

Video at link

(Excerpt) Read more at campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 112th; 2012veep; paulryan; ryan2012

1 posted on 04/04/2012 12:48:13 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I would be thrilled with Ryan as VP. Absolutely thrilled.


2 posted on 04/04/2012 12:52:14 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

I’m already crushed that Ryan was utterly devoid of principles to endorse Romney. His stock plummeted in my estimation.


3 posted on 04/04/2012 12:56:15 PM PDT by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Sorry..Paul Ryan taking on Obama. He has had his chance and they cannot get anything done with Obama Now-They don't have the clout and fight to bring Obama to his political knees. Same old direction, is all that I see taking place. ( Guess next the media will put Ryan in a superman suit) Imo.
4 posted on 04/04/2012 12:56:49 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Imagine Ryan in a debate with Plugs.

That would be like Einstein debating my shoe.


5 posted on 04/04/2012 12:59:06 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

So would I be thrilled.

He is combative and well spoken.


6 posted on 04/04/2012 1:00:10 PM PDT by Chickensoup (In the 20th century 200 million people were killed by their own governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

forget ryan, he is a nobody. It should be vetted Sarah Palin, without any question.


7 posted on 04/04/2012 1:04:19 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

“They don’t have the clout “

No, they needed about 40 more conservative/ Tea Party Representatives in the House.

Some of the worst spending bills passed the House with more Dem votes than GOP.
We just missed having the clout.
40 more votes is about all we need this time.


8 posted on 04/04/2012 1:08:27 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Ryan as VP would really upset those who will never vote for the GOP candidate regardless of the office being voted on... I like it!


9 posted on 04/04/2012 1:12:59 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup; ilgipper

We could do a lot worse. I like this possibility. I’m not thrilled, but then there’s not much to be thrilled about this time around, except for the idea of voting out 0bama.


10 posted on 04/04/2012 1:13:14 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
We just missed having the clout. 40 more votes is about all we need this time.

Getting 40 more tea party votes in the House is not having "just missed". It is missing by a wide margin.

The majority of Americans are not tea partiers, and do not agree with the economic conservatism of Paul Ryan. What that means is that, to the extent we want to move this country to the right, we have to use guile, and coalition building issue by issue. The same tools the left used to get us in this mess in the first place.

That is certainly not the preferred route, and contains its own potential pitfalls and missteps. But the sooner we recognize it is the only strategy that has a politically realistic chance of succeeding, the sooner we can get started.

11 posted on 04/04/2012 1:16:17 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

He sold out for same VP promise that Romney made to McDonnell, Paul, DeMint, etc., and I doubt he got it in writing.


12 posted on 04/04/2012 1:16:17 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: risen_feenix
I’m already crushed that Ryan was utterly devoid of principles to endorse Romney.

Paul Ryan has made a political decision to support Romney. All political decisions are compromises. Ryan had four choices and he picked one. It is irrational and preposterous to assert that this choice shows Ryan to be "utterly devoid of principles". The overwhelming likelihood at this point is that Romney will be the nominee. If and when that occurs, will those who choose Romney over Obama also be "utterly devoid of principles"?

13 posted on 04/04/2012 1:20:18 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
No, they needed about 40 more conservative/ Tea Party Representatives in the House.

That's true if the TP freshman return to their roots. That would mean a conservative as Speaker, not Boehner or Cantor.

I wonder if Michael Burgess or Allen West wants the job?

14 posted on 04/04/2012 1:20:40 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
forget ryan, he is a nobody.

It is just plain stupid to call Paul Ryan "a nobody".

15 posted on 04/04/2012 1:23:09 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

paul ryan is a nobody.


16 posted on 04/04/2012 1:26:02 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Like the Supreme Court justices, Obama has tried to publicly humiliate Ryan.

t will be pure pleasure to see both parties take Obama down.

17 posted on 04/04/2012 1:26:59 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Paul Ryan has not sold out to anyone. He is a good, strong Conservative who loves his country, but more importantly, has the courage to stand up and do something about it.

Paul’s fiscal genius for a Politician this young, is nothing short of amazing. He is smart enough to realize that this country is in dire trouble, so he has the intelligence to do what he has to, in order to have an influence in what he believes in most.

His positive, “DO SOMETHING” attitude and approach should be admired, not denigrated. We need more of his kind taking charge and they deserve our full support and respect.


18 posted on 04/04/2012 1:27:10 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I would be pleased to vote for a Santorum/Ryan or Gingrich/Ryan ticket. Ryan and anyone else conservative would get consideration. Ryan and Romney or Paul... phhht.


19 posted on 04/04/2012 1:29:17 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I think Mittens ‘ll pick someone from the south where he is weak..maybe hispanic too.. to soften his image as a white, out of touch rich guy.


20 posted on 04/04/2012 1:30:31 PM PDT by Mountain Mary ("This is OUR country and WE will decide"... Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

It is hard to believe that any part of your comments would be something I could agree with. If Paul Ryan were running for the nomination, he would have had my support over any of the four remaining. His attitude does deserve respect, but not on a doomed to failure Romney ticket. That would likely preclude him from running later.


21 posted on 04/04/2012 1:33:47 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
[paul ryan is a nobody.]

He will one day, be the President of the USA. And he is also smart enough to use Caps where they are appropriate.

22 posted on 04/04/2012 1:33:47 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Ryan belongs in the House (as House Majority Leader). Rubio needs to stay in the Senate.

The VP needs to not unbalance the ticket like it did last time (where the VP candidate overshadows the Presidential candidate).


23 posted on 04/04/2012 1:34:42 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I’m a big fan of Paul Ryan, but I’ve given up on supporting anyone for any public office.

Everyone considered for Pres or VP is inevitably uncovered to be either:

1) A RINO sellout; or
2) Of dubious Constitutional eligibility; or
3) Both.


24 posted on 04/04/2012 1:40:15 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

That’s your biggest problem. You place too many limitations on details, that are the very least of what we need to worry about at the moment.


25 posted on 04/04/2012 1:40:23 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Sometimes I wonder if these people here constantly knocking Romney are just pushing Obama, it is a little over the top.
Talk about Obama being a cry baby ha ha ha


26 posted on 04/04/2012 1:42:02 PM PDT by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; AmericanInTokyo; Antoninus; All
We need more of his kind taking charge and they deserve our full support and respect.

Oh really?

"Palin has one repetitious fault, where she refuses to listen to what people advise her to do or not do....She did the same thing a mayor, Governor, etc. She does things her way, without taking valid advice or criticism well. It's why she quit as governor and it is how she is running Sarah PAC, as well as her ridiculous “campaign”."

27 posted on 04/04/2012 1:43:00 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

He does not have the political savvy to get big things done. Greta had him swinging his head back n forth one night trying to make sense of his budget. He couldn’t even answer all of the questions and kept coming back to working with the Speaker. Don’t worry, if Mitt wants him, he’ll be Mitts because Paul is the shadow lately. We are still in trouble because many voters will not like Romney no matter who he picks for VP.


28 posted on 04/04/2012 2:16:07 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
On “subject” as usual, huh rabble rouser? Formerly known as Virginia Ridgerunner.
29 posted on 04/04/2012 2:23:39 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Do I get a free sub if I vote for him? I hope entitlement reform doesn’t mean the end of free subs. I’ll stick with Rick. He throws a mean curve on the lane.


30 posted on 04/04/2012 2:33:19 PM PDT by throwback (The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

“It is irrational and preposterous to assert that this choice shows Ryan to be “utterly devoid of principles”.”

Hardly. Ryan, like many of these 11th hour “endorsers” could have endorsed someone early when it mattered, someone whom they agreed with politically.

Or he could have waited until it no longer really matters, and give the front-runner his support.

That’s the act of an unprincipled schemer. Just like Romney.


31 posted on 04/04/2012 2:52:37 PM PDT by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
The majority of Americans are not tea partiers, and do not agree with the economic conservatism of Paul Ryan.

I agree, but Ryan is exceptionally eloquent at explaining the problems facing us. He would be a worthy choice in my opinion.

32 posted on 04/04/2012 3:10:44 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Ryan is a lightweight and a tax-sucking RINO. He has no principles when it comes to holding the line on spending. Keep him out of the VP sweepstakes.


33 posted on 04/04/2012 3:21:08 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risen_feenix

I think that Paul Ryan likely looked at the facts on the ground as of a week ago or so and concluded that Romney would almost certainly be the eventual nominee and that by endorsing Romney ahead of the Wisconsin primary, he (Ryan) would be helping bring the primary process to a close and get the general election campaign started.

This is a political decision and it involves judgement and compromise, but to say that this decision shows Ryan to be utterly unprincipled is nonsense.


34 posted on 04/04/2012 3:53:12 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
I agree, but Ryan is exceptionally eloquent at explaining the problems facing us. He would be a worthy choice in my opinion.

Oh, I agree completely. I'm referring to those conservatives who are quick to ditch any politician, including Ryan, if they do one thing that isn't ideologically pure. In Ryan's case, supporting Romney.

Those people are committing the same strategic flaw Hitler did on the Eastern Front. A rigid, unreasonable order to hold the line, never retreat tactically even if it gives you a strategic advantage, etc.. And that is a losing strategy.

If there are politicians whom we trust in general to try to move this country in the right direction, we've got to allow them some tactical political flexibility as to how to achieve that. "No retreat, constant attack" is a recipe for failure, because your enemies will figure that out, lure you into untenable positions, and obliterate you.

For example, Obama is making huge political mileage out of the supposed "subsidies" given to oil and gas companies. It's a ridiculous argument, and the amounts at issue are tiny. So now is the time when the GOP should call his bluff. Bohener and McConnell should make a joint statement: "These aren't subsidies. It is the same kind of tax treatment other American companies receive, such as not being forced to pay taxes twice, both overseas and here, on money earned overseas. Eliminating these provisions will further increase oil and gas prices, and hurt domestic supplies. But if you're going to lie to the American people about that to score political points for reelection, fine. We'll give it to you, and see if you're willing to put your signature where your rhetoric is. But the American people should know ahead of time that those higher prices and shorter supplies will be on your head. So here's your bill if you want to sign it."

It would turn the politics of the issue around completely, and hurt him. And we're only talking a few billion anyway, so it won't actually cripple the industry. But the political benefits in November, after a summer of ridiculously high prices, may be enormous.

35 posted on 04/05/2012 7:47:53 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson