Skip to comments.Obamaís Knife in Israelís Back
Posted on 04/05/2012 4:53:25 AM PDT by SJackson
- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -
Obama’s Knife in Israel’s Back
Posted By David Meir-Levi On April 5, 2012 @ 12:11 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 5 Comments
In his March 28th article, Israels Secret Staging Ground, in Foreign Policy, Mark Perry revealed previously secret information about Israels dealings with Azerbaijan; and many are now of the opinion that his article was in reality Obamas knife in Israels back. According to Perry, four unnamed senior diplomats and military intelligence officers leaked information indicating that Israel has purchased air force bases in Azerbaijan for use in preparation for an attack on Iran.
The likelihood that it is mere coincidence that four senior diplomatic and military intelligence sources separately leaked the same information at the same time is very small. So John Bolton holds Obama responsible. Bolton suggests that because Obamas private efforts to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran have failed, he decided to ratchet up the pressure on Israel by revealing sensitive, secret information that, once available to Iran, will make an Israeli offensive less likely to succeed, and thus be a deterrent to such an offensive. This is surely not the sort of thing that a head of state does to an ally; but it might be the sort of thing that an unconscionably Machiavellian President running for re-election might do if he perceives that an Israeli strike on Iran might be a political liability for him.
The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry denies any collusion with Israel, and, indeed, Azerbaijan is a rather unlikely ally for the Jewish state; but Wikileaks gives a solid basis for such collusion, the motivation for which may be Azerbaijans perception of Iran as an existential enemy.
Some Israeli analysts deride the very idea that Israel could be in league with Azerbaijan for a variety of strategic and tactical, military, logistical and political reasons, including the fact that an Iranian revenge attack on Azerbaijans oil production facilities could easily destroy the countrys entire economy.
But these commentators all miss the point. It does not matter whether or not the information is correct. Those who leaked it presumably thought that it was. It does not matter that the President says that he did not knife Israel in the back and has “no interest” in leaks of this kind, or that the US is crawling with thousands of intelligence and former intelligence officials. The buck stops at Obamas desk. He is the Commander-in-Chief of those thousands. Yet his response is dismissive, nonchalant, and insouciant: hardly the appropriate attitude when an allys secret defensive plans have been compromised, with potentially existential consequences.
In the context of a broader perspective this incident takes on rather dire dimensions, as it is the latest in a long line of anti-Israel statements and actions originating with Obama or with those working close to him.
This past February Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told Iran that he thinks Israel will strike as early as April. So Israels ally tells Israels enemy when Israel will strike. Surely, for Iran, this is news you can use. Was this just a gaff, or was it an intentional leak meant to undermine Israels military options? Panetta answers to Obama, but Obama seems to be insouciant, saying nothing.
Another problem regarding Obamas silence is the recent flap about a State Department officials refusal to acknowledge that Jerusalem is the official capital of Israel. This official is not to blame. She was merely conforming to the directives of her employer, the U.S. Department of State, which, despite Congress Jerusalem embassy act of 1995, and the recent Supreme Court decision recognizing Jerusalem as Israels capital, continues to ignore U.S. law. The State Department answers to the President, and the President is silent, insouciant, on this issue.
But he did have something to say about the status of Jerusalem on the White House website. Not too long ago Obama himself ordered the removal of all references to Jerusalem, Israel from the White House website, replacing them with Jerusalem. What could be Obamas motive for divesting Israel of its capital, and Jerusalem of its Jewish state? Connecting some recent dots will offer an answer to that question.
To a mostly Jewish AIPAC audience on June 4, 2008, front-running Presidential candidate Obama announced that Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided. But only a few days later, after being assailed by Arab-American and Palestinian spokespersons, he told a mostly Arab audience that its going to be up to the parties to negotiate.  To which audience did he lie?
But as the world had already learned a few months earlier, he was willing to divide not only Jerusalem, but all of Israel. In January, 2008, Obama said he supported the division of Israel into two parts by a Palestinian state. This stunning comment came as Obama, struggling to articulate his stance on key Mideast issues, asserted that “The Palestinians have a legitimate concern that a state have a contiguous coherent mass that would allow the state to function effectively.” Was Obama not aware that a land corridor between Gaza and the West Bank would effectively cut Israel in half, making it incoherent and non-contiguous, divided into northern and southern portions? Was this merely the gaff of an inexperienced, flustered and geographically challenged presidential candidate trying to accommodate Arab-American voters, or was Obama stating a priority that presaged a series of later presidential anti-Israel words and deeds?
Looking back a bit further into Obamas not-too-distant past, one may be able to find the likely answer to these questions.
During his presidential campaign (2007-08) he revealed to the press the names of those to whom he would look for guidance on Middle East issues, his brain trust as it were: Zbigniew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice, Bettylu Saltzman, Robert Malley, and Samantha Power, among others – a dream team for the anti-Israel crowd at home and abroad. Given his choice of advisors, it was not difficult to predict that he would be no friend of Israel.
And speaking of advisors, lets recall Obamas mentor and spiritual guide, the Reverend Dr. Jeremiah Wright who glad-handed and honored the notorious anti-Israel and anti-Jewish and anti-homosexual Louis Farrakhan, and who is still active in anti-Israel activities with his most recent participation in the planning of the Global March on Jerusalem (GMJ). Did Obama sit in Wrights fire-and-brimstone anti-Israel church and never inhale?
It is also important to recall Obamas comfort and conviviality with Arab and Arab-American anti-Israel leaders, some of whom saw him as a friend of Palestine whom they could trust to take strong pro-Palestinian positions once in the White House. Such leaders included the likes of Edward Said, Rashid Khalidi and Ali Abunimah. Obamas attendance at a vociferously anti-Israel celebration with these and other Palestinian-American leaders back in 2003 was apparently something of a political embarrassment to Obama during his election campaign, so much so that The Los Angeles Times withheld the video of his participation.
It was at this event that Obama is said to have told Ali Abunimah not to press him about Palestinian issues, explaining that he would be able to do more for the Palestinians once he is elected a U.S. Senator. Obama later denied saying that, but Abunimah never publicly retracted the statement and alluded to it several times in public appearances where he expressed his disappointment in Obamas positive statements about Israel.
Obamas comment to Abunimah was an eerie precursor to his recent hot mike gaff with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. Just as he did not want his voting constituency to know what he planned to do for the Palestinians once elected to the U.S. Senate, so too does he not want the American public to know what sort of flexibility toward Russia he looks forward to, regarding missile defenses, once elected to his second term as President. Obviously in both cases the nature of this post-election flexibility is something that, if known, would reduce his chances of being elected.
Given the above, it may be premature to suggest that Obama wants Iran to win, but clearly he wants Israel to lose.
 See http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0%2c7340%2cL-4209836%2c00.html for a comprehensive summary of the damage that this leak may cause for Israel. For the most detailed, in-depth and objective summary and analysis of the issue of why an Israeli attack on Iran may create problems for the USA and constitute a liability for the President see http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R42443.pdf .
 The video of that speech is no longer available on line but see excerpts at http://obamalies.net/obama-flip-flops-on-jeruselem.html ; and for the flip-flop when speaking to Arab audiences see: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/06/obama-backtracks-on-jerusalem.html and http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/05/another-obama-flip-flop-jerusalem/.
 For details of Obamas connections to radical Islam, CAIR and Farrakhan see http://www.danielpipes.org/5983/obama-would-fail-security-clearance; http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2008/10/more-on-the-links-between-obama-and ; http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29709_Terrorist_Fundraisers_for_Obama; and http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3602 (for his wifes connections too).
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/05/obama-betrays-israel-why-are-we-surprised/
Copyright © 2009 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.
Israel and especially American Jews need to realize Progressives will never be their friend and in fact as this administration has proven, they are aligned with Israel’s enemies.
Also, they need to realize the exact same thing about Marxism.
Looks like Obama is in the habit of promising being 'able to do more' and 'flexibility' if he can just win that next election.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
Yet, American Jews will flock once again to vote for him.
If Israel falls, that’s one step closer to crushing other Christian nations. The Evil One is standing closer than ever to his muzzy brothers.
Wait until he’s King of the World. All our troubles will go away!
You screw with the Mossad at your own peril. I’m just sayin.
I’m not so sure about that today. I am getting vibes the Jewish community is changing....
Hope you’re right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.