Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney opens lead in Santorum's backyard
Mitt Romney Leads In New Pennsylvania Poll ^ | 04/05/2012 | Doug Mataconis

Posted on 04/05/2012 6:49:16 AM PDT by Ocarterma

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-266 next last
To: oneamericanvoice
149 posted on Thu Apr 05 2012 16:09:55 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by oneamericanvoice: “He is taking a break for EASTER. Can you imagine him or any candidate stumping on Easter?”

Oh, some of us hard-line unreconstructed right-wing conservative Calvinists do oppose the “holy days.” I regularly work hundred-hour weeks, six days per week but nothing on the Lord's Day, which is the only biblical day of rest.

But would I publicly campaign on Maundy Thursday or Good Friday if I were a candidate for office? Probably not. Considering that Rick Santorum is a conservative Roman Catholic, taking four days off from campaigning for Easter makes sense. I don't agree with Santorum’s Catholicism but I certainly do not oppose him practicing what he professes.

201 posted on 04/06/2012 4:36:39 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim, I am HAPPY to read this from you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! romney is a baby killing, gay marriage loving, gun grabbing, big government liar. The more I learn of his religious cult, the more it seems the work of a demented and evil man. I will NEVER vote for that rat bastard, pos, socialist baby killer... I will not burn in hell for mitt! GOD bless you Jim!

LLS

202 posted on 04/06/2012 4:42:20 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: two134711
183 posted on Thu Apr 05 2012 22:25:33 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by two134711: “If I CC’d any posters, it’s only because I enjoyed reading your civil posts, no matter where you stood politically. If more posters on this site were of your honorable caliber, I’d have posted more, donated more, and who knows? Maybe a few other people felt the same.”

Thank you for the CC...

203 posted on 04/06/2012 4:43:34 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

Mark said he is demanding that obama tell us in the 80 plus Golf outings that he has had since he stole his office... how many women have played with him and we want their names... that is what Mark said.

LLS


204 posted on 04/06/2012 4:47:21 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
143 posted on Thu Apr 05 2012 15:46:15 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by Jim Robinson: “McCain was at least pro-life and a war hero. But I didn’t vote for him, I voted for Sarah. I will not pull the lever for the abortionist/socialist big government RINO Romney. And I don’t care who he selects as a running mate. Never again.”

Thank you for publicly restating your position here. We're conservatives, we believe in private property, and the owners of private property set the rules on how the property will be used.

I don't want to think about what decision I may need to make if Romney is the Republican nominee, and I'm focused on trying to prevent that from happening.

But I know this for sure... I'm not going to be pushing Mitt Romney on a site against the explicit warnings of the owner.

205 posted on 04/06/2012 4:53:55 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Ocarterma

Romney can only have a black, female, lesbian as a VP.


206 posted on 04/06/2012 4:59:11 AM PDT by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ocarterma

Fat lady is singing again - it’s going to be another one of those “hold your nose and pull the lever” elections.


207 posted on 04/06/2012 5:01:52 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

And notice how absent the constant “out of the file” discourse has been on these fake debates:

Silence on their favorite “women’s right to choose” file question.

Silent on “the soaring cost of insurance premiums” (even with the fascist phony-care law attempt)

Silence on actual (type) of employment (fiscal vs. real employment creation)

Silence on what specific actual programs, Mr. Mandate, says he’ll eliminate.

Silence on why Mr. Mandate wasn’t re-elected as governor.


208 posted on 04/06/2012 5:02:03 AM PDT by Varsity Flight (Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

Mandate-Mitt has the previous Hillary suport all locked up.


209 posted on 04/06/2012 5:10:20 AM PDT by Varsity Flight (Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
Assuming that Romney wins the R nomination, there will be a limited set of strategies that could realistically keep Obama from getting a second term. One will be in choosing the lesser of evils - voting for Romney. Sorry - the world often boils down to that bad of a choice.

The second thing to bear in mind is that Congress must be shored up with conservatives willing to roll back the regulatory power of the executive branch and its alphabet agencies. For too many years both R's and D's in Congress have ceded more and more power to the executive branch then hoped to win the big crap shoot that happens every four years. They have also been hesitant to call the Executive branch on overstepping its power cuz they think they can win the crap shoot next election.

You can't turn an ocean liner on a dime.

210 posted on 04/06/2012 5:11:09 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

I will look for it from work later today and post it. It was posted on FR about two days ago. I will let you know.

LLS


211 posted on 04/06/2012 5:18:17 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

“I guess we’d better prepare ourselves, because both he and Sarah Palin will support Romney if he’s the nominee.”

Which is what was evident 6 months ago. Reading between the lines, there could not be any other outcome. There are not enough eligible voters in this country who are pure conservatives. Just reality. Like Rush, I live in Realville.


212 posted on 04/06/2012 5:47:06 AM PDT by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Yes, when Karen spoke to our group of Conservative women, she said that Rick becomes Dad/husband/handi-man as soon as he walks through the door. :-)

Daughter Sarah is lovely and poised. I asked if she would do a favor for me. Being mature beyond her 14 years, she cocked her head to one side and politely said “um?” to my stupid question.
I probably woulda said “sure” and what if the supporter, ie me, asked for something ridiculous like to have Rick come over to my house for lunch. lol

Anyway, what I said was, “will you please give Bella a kiss for me?”. Her whole face lit and up and she said, “of course I will”.

Class act family. Compare the Duggars(I met 12 of them the other night!) and Santorum kids to the Kardashians.


213 posted on 04/06/2012 5:54:07 AM PDT by Mountain Mary ("This is OUR country and WE will decide"... Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum

Good analysis, Puddle.


214 posted on 04/06/2012 5:56:02 AM PDT by Mountain Mary ("This is OUR country and WE will decide"... Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum

“Fat lady is singing again - it’s going to be another one of those “hold your nose and pull the lever” elections.”

This Conservative activist has held her nose and voted for a Rino for the last time.

Actually, Rino would be a kind word for Mittens. He’s a liberal.

No thanks. My contributions will be to support and work on helping US Senate and House, local and state Conservative candidates get elected to office, which is what I do best. ..though my last several candidates have lost. Hard to keep a stiff upper lip and keep going but I will.


215 posted on 04/06/2012 6:02:37 AM PDT by Mountain Mary ("This is OUR country and WE will decide"... Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

Here is the link to the video.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-once-argued-only-connection-gop-party-registration-191719748.html

LLS


216 posted on 04/06/2012 7:13:20 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
Defeating Romney needs to be the goal, because I believe a Romney nomination runs a serious risk of re-electing President Obama.

On another note...should this go to convention the question is who are the delegates?..... How much money and deals will be swung around like a lottery winning.....

We are in sad condition when the highest bidder can buy anyone....and everyone has a price.

217 posted on 04/06/2012 10:05:15 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
We will have a new supreme court justice by 2016 almost surely. Do you want another Scalia or another Ginsburg? Maybe these points are raised again and again because they are valid.

The blame does not go to the voter WOSG....it goes to lap of the GOP who abandoned conservatism and put romney out there...again!

Romney is pro-abortion...pro-homosexual and much more...you cannot require people to support him when he will play his cards to sustain his popularity with the democrates and liberals....and you're forgetting that we are accountable to a higher power than that of simply principle....we are accountable to God for what we support... regardless if an individual believes so or not.....I will not support that which Romney promotes.

218 posted on 04/06/2012 10:16:20 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: caww; All
We agree, CAWW.

I saw enough trouble at our local county caucus in Missouri to see firsthand what a brokered convention on a national level would look like — in a county where Santorum won our primary by a huge majority, the Romney people won a majority of the delegates to our district convention because the Santorum people were split and the Ron Paul people managed to divide the vote between moderate Santorum supporters, including most of the county party leadership, and more radical people who had a lot in common with Ron Paul. In St. Charles County, things got so bad that the police were called and the caucus was shut down. The end result is the way delegates voted may have had little to do with the preferences of the people who elected them.

Gingrich is a student of history. He knew what he was talking about when he reminded people of Maj. Gen. Leonard Wood's failed bid to become the 1920 Republican nominee. I knew about that uproar long ago because I live outside Fort Leonard Wood and I do my research, but Gingrich was presumably preparing people to understand just what kind of a knock-down drag-out fight a brokered convention would look like.

The chaos at the Reform Party convention with Pat Buchanan is the only parallel we have had in modern politics, and that wasn't even close to what a brokered Republican Party (or for that matter, Democratic Party) convention would be like. The Reform Party convention was a circus sideshow that people knew meant very little. To have that kind of chaos at a major party convention would be a very different thing.

There are reasons why the Democrats pushed so hard to get Obama enough superdelegates to prevent a 2008 brokered convention. The Democrats avoided the debacle of a brokered convention — barely — and Republican leaders have understandable reasons for trying to prevent that now.

219 posted on 04/06/2012 10:58:00 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
So your God wants Obama to win re-election? Wow.

Might very well be if He intends this country's judgement to continue. He raised up Pharoah did he not? When Israel had turned her back on God.

Either way whoever wins...yes...it will be who God determines when all is said and done....for what purposes we will surely see.

"For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God." Romans 13

"He removes kings and establishes kings."... Daniel 2:21

"The Most High rules in the kingdom of men, and gives it to whomsoever He will"..... Daniel 25

Yet there is the example of King Saul....and King David.... The people demanded a king. Finally God granted their request and gave them exactly the kind of king they wanted; .tall, handsome and strong... He looked the part of a king... They got exactly what they asked for... Of course, God warned them of the consequences..... 1 Samuel 8:4-9....... They 'chose' the kind of king they wanted and that's exactly who God gave to them. ...On the other hand, God chose David..... What a difference!

I think the difference is when God "approves" or "ordaines" a leader. We know that Obama is not good for this country...we know the voters didn't heed the warnings....they got what they asked for. Does God approve of Obama...I think not.

" When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when 'the wicked' beareth rule, the people mourn"....Proverbs 29:2

220 posted on 04/06/2012 11:05:50 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
Interesting post Darrell.... There are some who say if this goes to convention .."there will be blood"....I tend to think that's a possibility. Romney and the LDS have invested gazillions into his 8 yrs. running for Pres.....and as we've seen pulled out the stops to take down Newt. They will do more so if this goes to Convention...and that against any who stand In Romney's way.

I do believe Newt and Romney are working the delegates and began doing so some time ago....as well as those who appoint those delegates. Sanatorium simply doesn't have the manpower nor connections strong enough to do so. Especially since he was the diversion away from Newt.

Am still hopeful Newt and Sanatorium can remain in this long enough to get to convention....the delegate card have not yet been played....candidates can fight the bound and unbound distribution of candidates as well.

Although I'd love to see Sanatorium drop out and give Newt the reins to take this all the way to convention. Ricks had his two man race and has failed thus far to stop Romney. So he cannot blame Newt any longer for his failures.

221 posted on 04/06/2012 11:19:59 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

You see? Why would people prefer Romney over Obama when you get the same result, right down to the PC, pandering remarks? Romney is such an IDIOT....I don’t care whether women get admitted to some club or not! Let the men have their clubs and the women have theirs!


222 posted on 04/06/2012 12:02:06 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: adc

Actually I’m beginning to think that a lot of the people who call themselves consesrvatives are just as stupid as Democrats.

Six months ago, I was getting over Perry dropping out, and hoping Newt might be able to get it done, while trying not to let myself acknowledge what I knew. Romney was inevitable from day one. You could tell from the earliest debates——no matter what his performance was like, no matter how badly he got his butt kicked, he always was “the clear winner.” Every time.


223 posted on 04/06/2012 12:10:28 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver; Ocarterma
PA is going to be interesting: PPP trend line is going Romney

Is PPP reliable, or are they an exarchate of RiNO Central?

224 posted on 04/06/2012 12:53:38 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Santorum has no chance of being the nominee even if he ends up eeking out a win at home anyway.

Thanks, Mitt, for that helpful insight.

You did that on the other thread, too.

225 posted on 04/06/2012 12:57:48 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MyronCopacetic
However, if he loses his home state in a primary, all that good work may be lost.

Spoken like a true RiNO troll from RNC Central, N00b. So who were you before you got zotted, or did you just establish this account to show off for your RiNO supervisor?

226 posted on 04/06/2012 1:04:53 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“McCain was at least pro-life and a war hero. But I didn’t vote for him, I voted for Sarah. I will not pull the lever for the abortionist/socialist big government RINO Romney. And I don’t care who he selects as a running mate. Never again.”

I fully concurr. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!”


227 posted on 04/06/2012 1:07:31 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Santorum’s insane obsession to stay in the race will destroy any hope he might have in the future.

You really hate Santorum's guts, don't you?

Why?

228 posted on 04/06/2012 2:03:01 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Actually I’m beginning to think that a lot of the people who call themselves consesrvatives are just as stupid as Democrats.

The reality is that people who call themselves conservatives are as rampant as those who call themselves catholics. They have no idea what it really means. Those who assign themselves are much fewer in number than the general population anyway. That’s the reality, and it’s hard to take. But it’s what we have in this culture and wishing it wasn’t so won’t change it. It will only return the POTUS back to O.


229 posted on 04/06/2012 5:42:46 PM PDT by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The question is, what do we as conservatives do next.

Do whatever you want. I intend to try to help unseat the Alien Usurper by voting for the gop candidate, Romney or whomever.

230 posted on 04/06/2012 5:54:31 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
If Rick loses... we all lose... and that is a fact

No, that is an opinion. And one with which a large proportion of Americans quite obviously disagree..

231 posted on 04/06/2012 6:05:14 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
Romney is not an idiot. Neither is he a movement conservative. He is best described as a pragmatist like Nixon. But setting aside his lack of ideological purity, he can bring serious strengths to bear which will make him a tough competitor against the Usurper.

Everyone here complains about, and acknowledges, his brutal but effective campaign in vanquishing his primary competitors. Let us assume he will unleash the same weapons against the Usurper--anyone got problems with that?

Financially he has a huge reservoir of resources available, more than Santorum or Gingrich or all the rest put together could hope to recruit. Romney may be the only guy out there who can go up against the leftwing money machine and not get flattened. That matters.

If he wins, he has the temperament to run things. When he said "I like firing people" he was saying something important about how he might approach reigning in wasteful gubbermint.

His experience in "Vulture Capitalism" may look pretty good when applied against wretched bloated bureaucracies like the Departments of commerce/education/energy/agriculture.

I'm a Newt supporter and have been, but the reality is what it is, it's time to face it and make the best of it.

232 posted on 04/06/2012 6:32:58 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (no but you can haz cheezburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

>> If Rick loses... we all lose... and that is a fact.

It was over the day the high and mighty ones turned their backs to Newt.


233 posted on 04/06/2012 6:36:59 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: throwback
Whether you call Obama a socialist in your stump speech is a tactical decision, not a critical judgment. I'd call him a fascist myself, but the point is, however accurate, either of these terms may well sound to the casual listener like partisan name-calling. It could lose you a few votes at the margin, which is where elections usually are won or lost.
234 posted on 04/06/2012 6:45:54 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (no but you can haz cheezburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Nobama_ever
The primary is when you vote for the candidate you want to. The general election is when you vote for the candidate you have to!

That sums it up very succinctly, nice work.

235 posted on 04/06/2012 7:06:41 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (no but you can haz cheezburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary
Rick is too good for this nation right now.

Funny, that's just what the whores and scoundrels of the NYSlimes have said about the Usurper. Maybe the two have more than that in common.

236 posted on 04/06/2012 7:10:10 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (no but you can haz cheezburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Yes it was... and I personally voted for Newt in Mississippi’s primary.

LLS


237 posted on 04/06/2012 7:17:11 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

“To save America, .... Romney should pull out.”

Correction: to save America BO needs to be defeated in November.


238 posted on 04/06/2012 7:59:06 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WOSG; CatherineofAragon; Mountain Mary; jwalsh07; Guenevere; cripplecreek; dirtboy; PSYCHO-FREEP; ..
I've posted to alot of the posters on this thread because this one issue highlights so effectively the perfidy of Mitt Romney and his total lack of any conservative principles.

I felt it needed further clarification and discussion as WOSG, a Romney supporter, is apparently woefully uninformed as most Romney supporters are and are running over the clift like a bunch of lemmings following the pied piper telling them the world will end tomorrow.

WOSG's original reply to me:

Romney and his family never supported gay marriage, but McCain’s family does with their vacuous duct tape ads.

Are you willfully ignorant or are you purposefully keeping your head in the sand where Romney is concerned?

Romney frequently says one thing, pretending to be a conservative, and then does what is really in his heart, Progressive Liberalism.

This is exactly what he did with Gay Marriage.

He has always STATED he believed marriage was between a man and a woman.

ANd then:

1. The supreme court of MA declared that current law of MA, where marriage was concerned, was discrimatory towards homosexuals.
2. The Supreme Court of MA directed the LEGISLATURE to fix the problem.
3. The Constitution of the State of MA declares that all laws concerning marriage are to be generated or created in the LEGISLATURE.
4. Romney was reminded of this fact by multitudes of various people.
5. Romney, not waiting for the LEGISLATURE, not heeding the constitution of the state of MA, not heeding the advice of a multitude of conservatives, deceitfully declared that Gay Marriage was the law of MA and directed the magistrates of MA to comply with this undeclared, unconstitutional law even threatening the magistrates of MA with being fired if they did not comply.

After it was all said in done, Romney himself, ALL BY HIMSELF, implemented Gay Marriage.

He is the Father of Gay Marriage.

239 posted on 04/06/2012 9:35:47 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: IWONDR; Diogenesis
Correction: to save America BO needs to be defeated in November.

Correction to your correction:

The crypto-Communist Obama and the lying left-wing, Progressive Liberal Romney both need to be defeated in November.
240 posted on 04/06/2012 9:37:22 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Comparing Romney to McCain is like comparing the Pinto to the Mustang II. Not worth the time.


241 posted on 04/06/2012 9:46:35 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; napscoordinator; AmericanInTokyo; Antoninus; Lazlo in PA; cripplecreek; ...
232 posted on Fri Apr 06 2012 20:32:58 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by hinckley buzzard: “If he wins, he has the temperament to run things. When he said “I like firing people” he was saying something important about how he might approach reigning in wasteful gubbermint. His experience in “Vulture Capitalism” may look pretty good when applied against wretched bloated bureaucracies like the Departments of commerce/education/energy/agriculture. I'm a Newt supporter and have been, but the reality is what it is, it's time to face it and make the best of it.”

I agree that is actually one of the very few things where I think Romney's background shows he'll likely do something useful.

Cutting waste to make companies (and the Salt Lake City Olympics) viable seems to be something Romney is good at.

For me, however, abortion is a make-or-break issue. I've watched the video of Romney discussing his pro-choice views during the Massachusetts governor race. I'm originally from Michigan and I know more than I should about the Romney family history on this issue. Even if I believe Romney has changed his views and will be pro-life in his policies, I do not believe he can be trusted to pick Supreme Court nominees who, once they're confirmed and never again need to face a vote for the duration of their life, will remain consistently pro-life.

Unfortunately, we have a long and sad history of Republican presidents nominating people to the Supreme Court who turn out to be real problems once they're on the court for life. I do not believe Romney can be trusted with this responsibility.

Some will attack me for being a single-issue voter. I'm actually not — I'm a Romans 13 voter. The government has certain biblical obligations to protect its people and punish evildoers, and I'm just as adamant on the need for a strong national defense, honest justice, and similar issues as I am about abortion. However, there are few issues on which America is failing in its responsibilities as clearly as abortion. If government can't protect babies from being killed in their mother's womb, it is grotesquely failing in one of its key functions — protecting the lives of its people and upholding justice via the sword of the state to punish evildoers.

242 posted on 04/06/2012 10:47:56 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFSOOFPAhXo&feature=related


243 posted on 04/06/2012 10:57:09 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands
I'm not trying to be tunnel-visioned, or intractably stubborn, or "taking my toys and going home". It's just that, over the past forty years, the trend has not been good. This is especially true for social conservatives, of whom the establishment demands their votes, but not their values; of whom they try to instill fear by warning that the other options are worse; or who delight in telling us that we have nowhere else to go.

Well, we no longer fear. The warned-against liberalism is now in our own party. We have been played.


Agreed. Let's not even look back over 40 years, let's go back to 1988.

In 1988 we got a moderate candidate because it was "his turn". He was not very conservative, and he gave us a more expensive government. In 1992, he also gave us Bill Clinton.

In 1996, again, another moderate candidate selected because it was "his turn". He gave us a second term of Bill Clinton.

In 2000, it was supposed to be McCain's turn, but George W. Bush had the money and right people backing him, so he jumped in line ahead of McCain. What did George W. Bush do? He proceeded to give us the most expensive, most powerful, most intrusive federal government in our nation's history (although Obama is trying to top him). Bush did this with a Republican Congress for several years of his time in office

In 2008, it was finally McCain's turn, and between him and Bush, they managed to give us Barack Obama.

Now here we are in 2012, and some folks think that because Romney has been running for the White House since 2005-2006 and because he has a lot of money backing him, that it's turn.

If Romney gets the nomination, he'll either give us a 2nd term of Obama, or if he gets in the White House (very unlikely), he will continue Obama and George W. Bush's trend of expanding the size, power, and cost of the federal government.

People who beat their heads against walls discover it feels pretty good when you stop beating your head against the wall. If Romney gets the nomination, I'm going to stop beating my head against a wall, or in this case, stop voting for folks just because they have an (R) next to their name. It's going to feel pretty good. The GOP has screwed me over too many times with the candidates it picks.
244 posted on 04/07/2012 1:21:02 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: All; SoConPubbie

Romney is saying that Rick is pro-”choice,” even though Rick and Karen are walking the walk.

Romney, and friends, are a lying smear machine.

Calling a talk show host in PA that is friendly to Rick, will help him, because a friendly talk show host will expand on our positive comments.


245 posted on 04/07/2012 9:44:20 AM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
[You really hate Santorum’s guts, don't you?]

No more than you “hate” Romney, actually not even close. I do not like Santorum due to his past record and his lack of honesty about it, which I have a right to point out. But I do not “hate” him.

On the other hand, you hate Romney, plain and simple, yet you condemn me for something you practice on a regular basis. I don't like Romney either, but we will likely be forced to vote for him if we like it or not. The alternative is far more dangerous and realistic than what Romney has been convicted of on this forum.

246 posted on 04/07/2012 10:00:01 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary; All

“..Anyway, what I said was, “will you please give Bella a kiss for me?”. Her whole face lit and up and she said, “of course I will”.

Class act family. Compare the Duggars(I met 12 of them the other night!) and Santorum kids to the Kardashians.”

Thanks for sharing that with us! What a loving and incredible family!


247 posted on 04/07/2012 10:18:22 AM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Not sure I understand the link to the lesbian singer Lesley Gore and her song, “She’s a fool.”

What am I missing?


248 posted on 04/07/2012 1:05:02 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: caww; LibLieSlayer
Thank you, LibLieSlayer, for your video of Romney saying his only tie to the Republican Party was his registration, and thank you, CAWW, for your comments on my brokered convention item.

If we go to a brokered convention, which is increasingly unlikely, we will have chaos.

Gingrich is good at being a bombthrower. That's how he's made his career, and I don't necessarily have a problem with that. However, I definitely see why it frightens the Republican establishment, just as the possibility of a 2008 brokered convention frightened the Democrats.

249 posted on 04/07/2012 1:15:16 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

Your guess is as good as mine. I am not really sure at this point. It meant something really important at the time, I’m sure. LOL.


250 posted on 04/07/2012 1:38:18 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson