Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww; BrewingFrog

Except who did he actually siphon votes from?

Back in Iowa, he ended up winning, and for all we know if he hadn’t, RIck Perry might have been that dark horse rising from Iowa. That would have changed things greatly.

He certainly didn’t siphon votes from Gingrich.


40 posted on 04/05/2012 10:21:39 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Iowa. Just like Huckabee...

Both Perry and Gingrich are both far superior candidates than Little Saint Ricky, yet do not mercilessly flog their faith in everyone’s face. Evidently, enough voters see this as a plus, and not a flashy curtain obscuring utter vapidity on nearly all matters pertaining to governance that this charlatan was able to stay in the race.

It also helps that the MSM went total blackout on Newt after Florida, instead only reporting on the “two front runners” in Mittens and Little Saint Ricky. Newt was too effective against them, so they shut him up.

With Little Saint Ricky and Mittens, the Establishment wins either way. Both are big spenders and will further the expansion of Big Government. Slower than Il Douche, but expansion nonetheless.


46 posted on 04/05/2012 11:12:13 AM PDT by BrewingFrog (I brew, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Santorum’s last minute surge in Iowa started when the media started putting forward the narrative that Santorum would get a “second” look..... He was a desperation vote since Cain was gone and Newt took damage, and Ron Paul was possibly going to take the win.


47 posted on 04/05/2012 11:13:02 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson