Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt will do fine
Charleston (WV) Daily Mail ^ | April 5, 2012 | Don Surber

Posted on 04/05/2012 12:05:13 PM PDT by Mustang Driver

The press is circulating Republican-insiders stories again, this time saying Mr. Electable is unelectable.

Don’t buy the latest spin from Democrats. Conservatives should stay calm, cool and collected.

Mitt Romney is the most presidential of Republican nominees since 1988. He looks the part, he acts the part and lives the part. He has worked his way up and made it on his own even though his father was a prominent businessman and successful governor. He is the grown-up in the room whose blandness is a strikingly attractive alternative to the All Trauma Obama presidency. Over the years he has taken progressively more responsible positions — from head of the Mormon mission in France to CEO of Bain Capital — that have built his self-confidence and the trust of others. When people talk about the Republican establishment, they are really talking about the successful people who will make up his government. This is about running a government.

President John McCain? Come on. What were we thinking? OK, the bench was thin. President Bush forgot to develop an heir.

Mitt Romney’s blandness is a plus because he exudes grace under pressure. He gets flustered. But he grins and bears it. This will serve him well in a very ugly campaign, perhaps the ugliest since 1800. We know after 4 years of watching President Obama that he is extremely vulnerable under pressure. He cracks. His temper tantrum against the Supreme Court showed how intellectually empty he is. My goodness, it is unprecedented to have justices turn down a law? Talk about acting stupidly. The pressure must be applied carefully and consistently.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.dailymail.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012endorsements; endorsements; mitt; romney; romney2012; romneysucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-149 next last
To: Finny

I was no Romney supporter last election or this election. I was all in for Rick Perry from the day he announced and fought hard for him. I watched him trashed relentlessly here. What gets me is that Romney haters refuse to accept the primary results. You all think some 100% conservative knight in shining armor is going to come riding in to save the day. It’s not happening. People we wanted to run didn’t even get in the race. Those who did were eliminated during the process. This is what we’re left with — reality check.


51 posted on 04/05/2012 1:07:11 PM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

“Mitt Romney is the most presidential of Republican nominees since 1988. He looks the part, he acts the part and lives the part.”

One of the stupider assessments. Mitt definitely looks like a Democrat President. Given his voting record, his record of deceit, etc. the statement above is accurate.

The article, however, mentions conservatives. He ain’t one.


52 posted on 04/05/2012 1:08:09 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

“Oh, I am sure that our side is much more determined to prevent another 2008 McCain sleep fest. You can bet that we will come out swinging and countering every bit or propaganda Obama can sling.”

Is it the weed that makes you think this way?


53 posted on 04/05/2012 1:09:56 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

“I don’t care if he tears down a $50 million house to build a $100 million one. His wealth is not the issue with me. The issues are his love of abortion, sodomites, socialized medicine, taxes, and liberalism in general. And they are insurmountable.”

This. All of it.


54 posted on 04/05/2012 1:11:38 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I think we ought to listen to Alinsky." - Gov. G. Romney (R), father of Bishop Willard M. Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper; DannyTN
There is some truth in the article. Romney has done well enough in these primaries to win most. This is despite some major flaws. The fact is, ideology aside, he does look and sound the part. I am frustrated beyond belief he is our nominee but he most likely is.

Romney does well in areas that have a lot of liberals/lean towards Obama or where he can outspend his opponents, or both. That's the dirty secret, and in the general election most of those liberals will vote Obama just like they did in 2008, and Obama and his supporters will be able to outspend Romney, not to mention the MSM unloading on Romney and his "religion".

There's nothing to be confident about. And as DannyTN said, a win for Romney is not a win for Conservatives - Romney will be able to do whatever he and the RINOs in Congress want to do, because there will be very little Republican opposition to him, since so many Republicans in Congress are cut from the same cloth that Romney is.
55 posted on 04/05/2012 1:12:17 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange; Persevero

“All he’s got to do is approve the Keystone pipeline and some drilling here and there, lay off the coal plants, chip away at welfare, cancel Obamacare - all of which I do believe he’ll do if elected, and I am not a Romney cheerleader.”

You add to that simply NOT putting execrable leftists on the Federal judiciary, at NLRB and the other alphabet soup regulation boards, and ending Obama’s hidden amnesty and kowtowing to our enemies, and you’ve got reason enough to be thrilled to fire Obama.


56 posted on 04/05/2012 1:12:40 PM PDT by WOSG (Anyone But Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Finny
People are so busy looking behind them in their panic, that they're failing to watch where they're headed. They forget that in voting "against" something, they are also voting FOR something, and voting FOR liberalism always empowers liberalism.

Courage -- including the courage to risk a much-weakened Obama for another four years as the price of fighting to preserve the Republican party as an antidote to liberalism -- is our best chance of being victorious in the long term to save America from socialism. The best way to weaken Obama AND Romney, regardless of who wins, is to vote third-party to dilute the percentage plurality of the winner.

Romney in the White House, the product of fear, panic, and desperation, would be the the agent that brought the Republican party to surrender to statism and liberalism; Romney would be the catalyst to make the Republican party a wholesale enabler of liberalism and disabler of any Republican fight against it.

Romney has consistently promoted the very crushing government statism that stifles morality, freedom, and prosperity, and which nourishes strife and repression -- cap-and-trade regulation to squelch energy and production; on-demand tax-funded abortion; forced acceptance of open homosexuality in all corners of our lives and punishment for resisting it; nationalized health care. Voting for Romney is NUTS.

Great post. Clearly explained. Those who jump on to help elect a democrat (Romney), will weaken what is left of the party, and sink it in the end. The courage to fight a weakened foe will result in galvanizing the base and raising the party.

57 posted on 04/05/2012 1:15:47 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
All he’s got to do is approve the Keystone pipeline and some drilling here and there, lay off the coal plants, chip away at welfare, cancel Obamacare - all of which I do believe he’ll do if elected ...

Have you been reading on FR about Romney's advisors who are on the same team as Obama with regard to carbon controls for "global warming"?

Have you checked out RomneyCare in Massachusetts, and observed that Romney CONTINUES to hail it as a success?

There is ZERO ZILCH NULL NADA reason to think he'd do anything but exactly what he's advocated all along: frustrating energy production in the name of "the environment" and promoting government-run, government-monopolized, health care.

FRiend, Republicans' fear of Obama will have ZERO affect on Romney's penchant for liberalism and government repression, your wishful thinking notwitstanding.

58 posted on 04/05/2012 1:16:09 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Since you seem so obsessed with the effects of “weed” on people, you must have current and first hand experience yourself.

The last time I smoked it, was 40 years ago in a foxhole while we were waiting for the NVA to assault our perimeter. It was at that moment, I realized that reality was not only better, but staying sober was vital to staying alive. I have not touched it since.

59 posted on 04/05/2012 1:17:18 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Thank you for your kind words.


60 posted on 04/05/2012 1:18:23 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
What gets me is that Romney haters refuse to accept the primary results.

This year I have been reminded so many times of the quote attributed to the late Pauline Kael:

"How could Nixon have won?? Nobody I know voted for him!!"

There are far too many Freepers who live in their own little bubbles, and refuse to accept the reality that there are lots of GOP voters out in the big blue room who are just fine with a moderate candidate.

Instead of going out there to convince those middle of the road Republicans why Romney is a dismal candidate, most Freepers prefer to shout loudly in the echo chamber, and whinge about how they'll hold their breath 'till they turn blue if Romney is the nominee.

61 posted on 04/05/2012 1:19:06 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio esta enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

“All he’s got to do is approve the Keystone pipeline and some drilling here and there, lay off the coal plants, chip away at welfare, cancel Obamacare -”

What of liberty?
What of reigning in out of control gov’t spending”
What of massive change that is needed?
What of reigning in the fed?

He won’t get it done, nor sees a need for it. Hasn’t made a peep. He is a statist who will want to tidy up around the edges.


62 posted on 04/05/2012 1:19:13 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Perhaps Romney should simply reply by asking why they want to know. He could also educate those in the press and the anti Mormons in general to the fact that other religions also have particular modes of dress that may seem quaint or unusual but are meaningful to the members who adhere to that faith. There are the obvious Amish and Mennonites, and any number of other religious denominations who chose their attire in accordance with their beliefs. Many religions also include cosmetics, hair cutting, facial hair and much more in their list of do's and dont's for their faithful. The ritual garments are many and varied for Catholics both in and out of the clergy. Every item a Catholic priest wears to say Mass has a symbolic meaning and nuns wear habits and the Pope wears a cassock and some priests still wear beretta's and on and on. Surely the media, as well as even the most hateful and spitful anti Mormons, would not want to embarrass themselves by appearing so ignorant of world wide religious practices as to make so much of what type undergarments a Mormon wears. p>
63 posted on 04/05/2012 1:19:26 PM PDT by mountainfolk ( God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Romney, should he be elected, will likely be like Dwight Eisenhower, a semi-conservative leader. He will not be a Reagan and hopefully not a Nixon. Typically, he’ll ride the line right between the two and that makes him similar to Eisenhower.

LMAO, where you getting this crazy idea?

Because Romney's electoral history goes against everything you just said.

Romney's one election win was done running on a pro-abortion, pro-sodomy platform. Once he realized he couldn't win another term, and started eying the White House, he pretended to change his stances and pretended to be a Conservative, but his entire political history before he started running for the White House was based on a very liberal mindset.

The only difference between a liberal like Romney with an (R) next to his name, and a liberal like Obama with a (D) next to his name is how fast they are going to take you down the road to socialism. Obama wants to head there at top speed, Romney is willing to go slow enough that gullible Republicans don't realize where he's taking them.

And may God help us, because there are a lot of gullible Republicans who are burying their heads in the sand over Romney.
64 posted on 04/05/2012 1:19:31 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
I just don’t understand conservatives bashing success.

I trust you do understand conservatives bashing pro-abortion, pro-sodomy politicians?

I will not cast a vote to raise such a person to high office.

65 posted on 04/05/2012 1:20:42 PM PDT by Lady Lucky ( Romney -- the pink slime of presidential politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

“And if Romney uses some of the same ammunition McCain had available but declined to use, and I think he will, 0bummer likely will twist and writhe like a worm on a hook.

He seems to have arrived at the theme, “Obama is a bit out of touch”

OOOOOOooooooohhhhhh!! Devastating!!!!!


66 posted on 04/05/2012 1:21:01 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
What gets me is that Romney haters refuse to accept the primary results. You all think some 100% conservative knight in shining armor is going to come riding in to save the day. It’s not happening. People we wanted to run didn’t even get in the race. Those who did were eliminated during the process. This is what we’re left with — reality check.

I'm not going to vote for a pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, pro-gun control liberal pretending to be a Republican so he can get in the White House. A lot of people take abortion seriously, because it's murder. Romney will not win without us.

And don't tell me that we have to choose between Obama and Romney, because Obama is an excuse for people to vote for Romney, not a reason, and there is a huge difference.
67 posted on 04/05/2012 1:24:02 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

PF,
I’ve never tried it. As such, I hope your recovery continues.
I just couldn’t come up with any other possible explanation - other than
hallucinatory - to explain why you would post what you did...


68 posted on 04/05/2012 1:25:03 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
Mitts record and own words demonstrate just how fine he will not do.

He may win the nod but he will not get my vote. If he loses blame those who backed a liberal.

69 posted on 04/05/2012 1:27:47 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

Vote for Romney and nothing will change. The President will still be Barack Obama. The GOP will still be squishy and decomposing into a second liberal party.
Refuse to vote for Romney, now and in November, and let the GOP know it in the most emphatic terms, and maybe something will change.
If not, at least you tried.
Don’t just sell out, submit, and roll over.


70 posted on 04/05/2012 1:28:03 PM PDT by Lady Lucky ( Romney -- the pink slime of presidential politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Romney is more intelligent, articulate and capable as an executive leader than those three. If we survived Eisenhower and GHWBush, we can survive moderate Romney.

Can we survive nationalized health care when it is promoted and defended by a Republican president?

Can we survive onerous, energy-killing regulation in the name of the environment when it is promoted and defended by a Republican president?

Can we survive activist liberal judges when they are appointed by a Republican president?

Can we survive a succeeding Democrat president who will make Obama's politics look conservative by comparision, just as Obama made Clinton look benign by comparision?

You and others will challenge: "Yeah, but, can we survive another four years of Obama?"

To that I say: YES, if the Republican party's brand as an antidote to big government is defended and preserved, and if we vote such that both Romney AND Obama receive a very, very small plurality of votes.

If Obama is re-elected with 42 percent or less of the vote, the Republican party will get a boost in strength to oppose him. "The sky is falling!" Chicken Littles who predict the End of the World if Obama wins, are guessing. Yet if Romney wins, even with a small plurality, there's no guessing -- it's absolutely certain: liberalism would become stronger in both parties and the ability of Republicans to oppose it would be debilitated.

"Moderate" Romney, who would surrender the Republican party to liberalism, would be nearly impossible to survive; there's more hope with a weakened, fractured Obama.

71 posted on 04/05/2012 1:35:56 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

“success”: Strawman. Romney: Don’t want!


72 posted on 04/05/2012 1:36:17 PM PDT by tumblindice (our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
I trust you do understand conservatives bashing pro-abortion, pro-sodomy politicians?

Do you really believe that in his heart he is all of those things? Or did he go along to get along during a time when MOST republicans were cowed into the corner and afraid to profess their pro life views or any conservative views. Until GW came along and openly talked about Jesus and his own pro life stance, it wasn't a popular thing to do. We still see it happening with some of the establishment republicans in congress - they are afraid of being called homophobic or racist or anti-women. Look what happened to Trent Lott and Steve Macacca Allen and others. The times are changing and the new Republicans like Ryan, Rubio, DeMint, West, etc. are finally starting to fight back on the things we believe in. Giving Romney has been taking it to obama a chance to do so sure beats the alternative.

73 posted on 04/05/2012 1:38:20 PM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Saying "Romney is a formidable threat to win the Republican nomination" - which is what I have been saying for a year - is not the same thing as saying "I like Romney and want him to win".

There has not been a conservative alternative to Romney who entered the race without a trunkload of baggage.

The circular firing squad manned by the conservative base sure didn't help either. How many Freepers who bitched endlessly about Perry or Bachmann or Cain wouldn't give a quart of blood to have one of those three instead of Romney now?? Too late!!

In a nutshell, it's fine with me if you loathe Romney. But anyone who underestimates his appeal to a large segment of the GOP electorate is, basically, delusional.

74 posted on 04/05/2012 1:38:34 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio esta enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Good point. I am harboring hope for a miracle where we have a truly viable alternative to Romney AND Obama.


75 posted on 04/05/2012 1:39:06 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Thanks for your kind words. :^)


76 posted on 04/05/2012 1:44:05 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

I can’t believe that Don Surber wrote this. Over the past few weeks, he’s really written some great stuff. This undoes all of it.

Mitt Romney is electable because he’s produced a couple of good sound bites against Obama? But what about all the things that Romney stands for? Tax funded baby killing. Gay marriage on demand. Government takeover of healthcare. Crony capitalism. Contempt for the little people. He is no better than Obama. Our only hope is either to unite behind a conservative write-in candidate, or to gain a majority in the House and Senate and deadlock everything for another four years. Easier to do that with a crazed Communist Democrat in the White House than a crazed Communist Republican.


77 posted on 04/05/2012 1:45:34 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
He seems to have arrived at the theme, “Obama is a bit out of touch”

OOOOOOooooooohhhhhh!! Devastating!!!!!

He will have to "step it up a bit" and I really think (and hope) he will. He could let Newt sock it to 0bummer too, as only he can. This needs to be a battle from multiple fronts.

78 posted on 04/05/2012 1:49:00 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: donna

There has been an increased interest in the Constitution and constitutional government. I’m writing a book on the subject myself which will, I hope, add to this.

I think the people have awoken and will work to thwart further encroachments on their liberty. I see similarities to the 1760’s when the people started to get a sense of the conspiracy against them. We’re learing their tricks.

Romney may gain the executive power of the people (and actually I think he will do a good job with the executive branch to halt the bureaucrats encroachment on our liberties), but the people through the congress must keep him in check. We conservaitives are through being silent just because there’s a republican in office.


79 posted on 04/05/2012 1:59:09 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
McCain also sat on his hands and played dumb

McCain wasn't playing.

80 posted on 04/05/2012 1:59:45 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Funny, that’s what liberals say, too.


81 posted on 04/05/2012 2:02:20 PM PDT by donna (Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
Don’t buy the latest spin from Democrats. Conservatives should stay calm, cool and collected.

This guy has it all wrong! It's the CONSERVATIVES who are saying Romney is unelectable BECAUSE IT'S TRUE. If the Dems are in fact saying that Romney is unelectable, IT'S BECAUSE THEY GOT IT FROM *US*.

Furthermore, we CONSERVATIVES want to stay calm, cool and collected as WE BEAT ROMNEY'S @SS IN THE PRIMARY.

I'm calm. I'm cool. See? :-)

82 posted on 04/05/2012 2:04:51 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

I haven’t heard Conservatives bashing his sucess or his money. What I hear is people bashing his lack of Conservatiism and his lack of people skills, I’m not sensitive about his reaching into his pocket and offer to place a $10,000 bet, although some are. I’m sevsitive to his lack of Conservatism and if you notice he doesn’t seriously even try to reachout to them. I’ll not consider Romney as long as there are alternatives, he hasn’t considered me.


83 posted on 04/05/2012 2:05:31 PM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

Fine is not enough.


84 posted on 04/05/2012 2:06:17 PM PDT by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117; Lady Lucky
Or did he go along to get along

Let's abort babies to get along? No, thx.

85 posted on 04/05/2012 2:08:55 PM PDT by donna (Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I’m from MA. I know what Romney’s like. As an executive, I don’t see him being as liberal as Nixon. He see’s which way the winds blow and if more conservatives are elected to congress, he’ll move in that direction. He’s not a principled and determined man like Reagan. That’s why I see him more as an Eisenhower, a sort-of milquetoast, moderate politician. Not an activist like a Hoover or a go along with whatever the congress passes like Nixon. And not an agenda setter like Reagan. Typical of Romney, some sort of meandering executive.


86 posted on 04/05/2012 2:09:26 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
. If we survived Eisenhower and GHWBush, we can survive moderate Romney.

Why in hell should we have to survive eight more years of Romney and another Democrat when we can wait four more years and elect a conservative?

Why should we let the Republican party slide back into a minority in Congress, all while Romney works with RINOs to pass legislation Obama could only dream of passing?

87 posted on 04/05/2012 2:11:34 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

That is a fine article, well presented from a clear thinker.


88 posted on 04/05/2012 2:12:10 PM PDT by citizen (Santorum: Man up, stop being selfish and get the hell out. Dragging this thing out only helps Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; All

Huff glue, it makes things better...

Oh, I almost forgot: “EARTH PIMPS!” Ping.


89 posted on 04/05/2012 2:12:22 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Has Mittens won one "Red State" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Are you old enough to remember 1994?

You need to do some in depth research, not relying upon the liberal media.

I can’t begin to tell how wrong you are.


90 posted on 04/05/2012 2:12:56 PM PDT by donna (Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

Because all the House did with that huge 2010 mandate was blow it in playing follow the Boehner.


91 posted on 04/05/2012 2:15:05 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Romney is more intelligent, articulate and capable as an executive leader than those three.

And, less principled and honorable than those three.

Romney as as big a liar as Bill Clinton with a more liberal record and far less charisma.

92 posted on 04/05/2012 2:15:20 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

This is why I never contribute $1.00 on my tax returns towards the Presidential Campaign Fund.


93 posted on 04/05/2012 2:18:29 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

“What of liberty?
What of reigning in out of control gov’t spending”
What of massive change that is needed?
What of reigning in the fed?”

I think he’ll probably rein in some spending. The rest I am not sure.


94 posted on 04/05/2012 2:27:32 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

“You add to that simply NOT putting execrable leftists on the Federal judiciary, at NLRB and the other alphabet soup regulation boards, and ending Obama’s hidden amnesty and kowtowing to our enemies, and you’ve got reason enough to be thrilled to fire Obama.”

I can only assume he’ll appoint better judges than Obama has.

Obama has demonstrated he’ll nominate the most execrable of leftists.

I don’t think Romney as a great savior of the Republic, just that he will do less damage than O, and possibly some good in the financial and foreign policy areas.

My hopes are not high.


95 posted on 04/05/2012 2:32:21 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“So who are we to believe, your hope, or his campaign staff. “

I’ve heard him state repeatedly he’s going to get rid of Obamacare.

Of course he could be lying.

We can go with Obama, who champions Obamacare, or Romney, who SAYS he’ll repeal it.

So call it hope if you want, I think we have a chance with Romney and none whatsoever with Obama. That’s just how I see it.


96 posted on 04/05/2012 2:34:14 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

P,
I agree. Unfortunately, Newtonium has proven unelectable this go round. I don’t see anyone else who has the potential to make massive changes.
Willard is a get a long guy. Any pork any rinos want to add to bills will not be opposed. I fear as much from a Willard win as an Obama win.


97 posted on 04/05/2012 2:36:18 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldn’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
Of course he could be lying.

Romney at CPAC, January 2012:

1. "I have always been Pro-Life"
2. "I was a severely conservative Governor of MA"
98 posted on 04/05/2012 2:41:43 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

“Romney’s watered down Republicanism will not “fix” anythign and the economy will stagnate “

All he’s got to do is approve the Keystone pipeline and some drilling here and there, lay off the coal plants, chip away at welfare, cancel Obamacare -

all of which I do believe he’ll do if elected, and I am not a Romney cheerleader.

This economy would take off like a rocket.

Yes, but only because it has been held down so long. The problem is it would only go up for abut 2 year and long term sustained growth will slow.... leading to the next election, I hope it would be enough, but I fear it being a “slow lingering” recovery...


99 posted on 04/05/2012 2:53:04 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

Don, you ignorant slut.


100 posted on 04/05/2012 3:09:07 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson