Skip to comments.The Story Unravels: New Questions about Trayvon Martin's Final Hour
Posted on 04/09/2012 12:23:58 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It was a fable for our times:
Once upon a time, a nice young man set off from his dad's fiancée's home before the NBA All-Star game to buy some Skittles and Arizona Tea for his stepbrother. Although the lad was seventeen, he looked like a cute twelve-year-old. Along came a burly ex-con racist vigilante who didn't like the idea of a young African-American male walking around his gated community at night. The cop-wannabe stalked the frightened boy, cornered him, and then shot him. But the racist police didn't arrest the murderer. The conscience of the nation was stirred. Protests erupted from coast to coast. The gunning down of young, unarmed black males by white Rambos -- and the occasional "white Hispanic" -- is an all-too-common occurrence in the US of A.
Now the MSM narrative is unraveling, thanks to Al Gore's nifty invention, the internet. The average MSNBC viewer may not have the smarts and curiosity to do a Google search, but other people do. A lot of the searches wind up at the sites of the Orlando Sentinel and the city's Fox affiliate, Channel 35, both of which have provided good coverage.
Now other local papers are running stories about the "complexity" of the case.
We've learned a little more about Trayvon Martin. Since his record of suspensions and his posts and pictures, with tats and grill, from his Myspace and Twitter accounts surfaced on the web, columnists are less likely to enthuse about him, as a WaPo blogger did on March 18:
By all accounts, Trayvon was a good kid[.] ... He had dreams of becoming a pilot. He was good at math. ... Trayvon's English teacher described him "as an A and B student who majored in cheerfulness."
"So what?" the left responds....
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’d love to see him owning a certain network.
That would be cool. And better, if so many of the MSM pundits get their ass handed to them.
I'm kinda up about this media mess after reading the police report. Once the grand jury decides there is no evidence to indict, I'm going buy more ammo while laughing my ass off.
I know it's not right, but I want to see the no-loads burn their cities down again. Think how that will piss off the independent voters.
Better, if you watched the televised reports of the Koreans standing on top of their stores with rifles during the 1992 Rodney King Los Angeles mayhem, multiply that by a 10 thousand fold. Got question as to why gun and ammo sales are through the roof? Thought not.
The race-baiters really want to keep pushing against us who have no concern for pigmentation? Okay. Bring it. This "hood" is ready...
Dec 27, 2011
This was a banner year for guns -- 2011 is set to smash the record for gun sales. The record for a single year was set just last year,...
When whites go vote in November, should wear Hoodies, like white ones.
Ruger Suspends All New Firearms Orders: Incoming Order Rate Exceeds Our Capacity
Gun sales boom in expectation of Obama re-election
DHS Massive Police State Tac Gear Buildup
A run on Guns is making investors happy
With all due respect.....no, they won't. The reasons are very simple: There is strength in numbers, and they tend to be quite cowardly (it's actually quite rare to read of a black-attacking-white story where it's a 1-on-1). They will stay where they can maraud en mass, meaning the cities.
Venturing into the burbs does two things that they don't want: First, they dilute the 'power' of their numbers congregated in one locale, and second....they face a LOT of white homeowners armed to the teeth.
Oh yes....and there's that little detail of "how would they actually GET to the 'burbs......".
And he’ll lose it all within four years.
First; They performed the Honkification of Zimmerman..
Then they came for me..
A question all whites should be asking themselves..
That nice little kid was beating the snot out of Zimmerman..
Then Zimmerman capped his ass.. poor little thugg..
I wear hoodies most every day. I own white,gray and black.
Not enough. From the ‘60’s on, we’ve seen the pattern in these riots. Major crowds; hiding among their “peers” with no fear of being individually identified (as a suspect or as a target). Not worth the trouble.
No, they’ll stay where they are....in their ‘hoods. They may venture into “downtown” but they are not organized. Your suggestions imply organization and planning.
I shall add to my vocabulary! Ha!
OWS, New Black Panthers, SEIU, ACORN, DNC, Int'l ANSWER, Weather Underground, Anarchist Groups, Van Jones' organizations, CP-USA, Nation of Islam, etc...
In the 1960’s, Ike, JFK, LBJ and Nixon were in the White House. Mr. Obama is a whole different breed of cat.
I see your point about those groups.....but let’s see how “organized”, able to mass “troops”, and finally.....how brave they are when real bullets start flying at them.
They’d fold like pup tents. Libs are cowards. Rioters are cowards. It’s easy to preen and puff and threaten and scowl and show “muscle” to the media; whole different thing to take on an armed and determined populace.
No, I just don’t see it at all. They’ll pick their targets, natch....but they will only hit where they’ll A) get the most exposure via the media, and B) where they have the best chances for “success”.
Hitting Joe and Jane American in their quiet suburban neighborhood won’t cut it and they know it.