Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Proceeding with a third party
Cato in PA

Posted on 04/10/2012 4:52:33 PM PDT by Cato in PA

So it’s come to this.

Rick Santorum dropped out of the race earlier today, which leaves Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul in the running. By any reasonable estimate, Paul still doesn’t stand a chance and Newt won’t mount a serious challenge barring divine intervention.

We’re left with Willard Romney the open socialist, who stands against everything we believe in as conservatives. There are many among us who refuse to vote for him. We who feel this way must unite behind a third party if we’re going to accomplish anything. If we don’t, we’re no better than the party-line Republicans who cry about the need for change but do nothing about it.

JimRob hasn't called for a third party, and that's fine. I'm certainly not criticizing him. But if he won't, I will.

I’d like to take a moment now to quash any lingering doubts you may have about the necessity or wisdom of doing this in case you've somehow missed my other posts.

1) We know Obama is a Marxist. He’ll do bad stuff. Romney is a political weatherwane! There’s a *chance* that he might do good.

Wrong. Romney’s conservatism is 100% rhetoric. If you want to know what the man stands for, look at his record. He ran to the left of Ted Kennedy in 1994 and lost. He governed Massachusetts as a far-left radical, even going so far as to sign socialized medicine into law, a decision he defends to this day. He also defends the bailouts.

HE ADMITTED THAT HE IS A PROGRESSIVE. The vast majority of his judicial picks were far-left judicial activists. He lobbied Obama to adopt the individual mandate on a national level as late as 2009.

Nothing about Romney’s record could even cast him as a moderate. He'll do nothing to stop our economic collapse, and with him at the helm, the Republicans will take the blame. You thought 2008 was bad? Just wait until 2014. How do you think President Jellyfish would stand up to a Democrat-controlled Congress?

2) Okay, so Romney is a liberal. But he and the other Repubs will HAVE to listen if we elect a Republican president!

Wrong. We’ve fallen for this ruse time and time again. Even the historic Republican victory in 2010 didn’t work in our favor; we got Crybaby Boehner and Moderate McConnell, who refuse to listen to us even when a Democrat president is in the White House.

Why would they suddenly toughen up on liberalism if we replaced a liberal Democrat with a liberal Republican?

3) No, no, we have to change the Republican party from within!

How many years have we heard this? How well has it worked out? Will it EVER work out? No, because the Rockefeller wing holds the reins of power and will never let them go.

Even after a historic “Tea Party” victory in 2010, nothing has changed. If that won’t change anything, then how else can we achieve change at the voting booth?

4) But this is an election year, the WORST time to start a third party.

There will never be a ‘good time’. Most people don’t pay attention to politics in off-years, so we’d probably be ignored if we waited. If we do it during an election year, yes, we’re going to split the vote in certain cases.

Nobody ever said that change would be easy, but it’s necessary. If we do nothing, we’ll be no better than the Mittwits.

We need to strike while the iron is hot so we’ll get exposure. If we can get exposure, we can make progress. As difficult a fight as this will be, the only other option, trying to change the GOP from within, is a proven failure.

5) I think you’re just a sore loser. You need to compromise and accept Romney even if he’s not your perfect pick!

This isn’t about purity; this is about principle. Part of politics involves compromise, which is why I’ve said over and over again that I’d vote for Santorum or Gingrich. Paul never really had a chance, so the question doesn’t apply to him.

But part of compromise is having enough -principle- to know compromise becomes caving. And you know what? There are certain things that aren’t worth compromising over, like supporting an open socialist. These are the sort of distinctions that party-line Republicans are incapable of making. They’ve pulled the GOP lever all their lives, and they just can’t imagine doing otherwise.

6) A vote against Romney is a vote for Obama.

Wrong. A vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for change in the only means still available to us: rebellion. We’ve tried to get the establishment to listen to us for so many years, but our concerns have fallen on deaf ears.

Your continued support will only result in more of the same. You don’t stop someone from abusing you in a relationship by staying with them if you can't resolve your differences; you leave.

7) It will be YOUR fault if we have another 4 years of Obama!

Dead wrong. If you want to blame someone for Obama’s re-election, blame the establishment for backing a far-left radical who has sharply divided the GOP and destroyed voter enthusiasm nationwide. Turnout is abysmal and Willard looks even worse in the polls than John McCain did.

The GOP base has basically already given up. It’s like 2008 but worse. If you want to vote for the person responsible for that, be my guest.



Now...we can talk about how angry we are, or we can do something about it. Let’s start throwing some ideas around for how to proceed if the inevitable turns out to be true and Romney is the GOP nominee.

Should we try to create a new third party? Would an existing third party suffice? Let’s discuss.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fthernc; party; third; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2012 4:52:36 PM PDT by Cato in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I thought we had a real chance to change the GOP after the 2010 elections, but then the empire struck back. I’m done with them.


2 posted on 04/10/2012 4:54:32 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA; EternalVigilance

Ping


3 posted on 04/10/2012 4:54:50 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

So what is your plan to get even one electoral vote when you can’t even win the Republican party nomination?

You have to get more than 50% of a state to get an electoral vote.

I call BS. Calling Mitt a socialist is a falsehood. A third party is a recipe for 4 more years of Obama.

Shame on you.


4 posted on 04/10/2012 4:56:06 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I don’t know about anybody else, but I don’t find it at all suspicious that somebody who joined in October of 2011 is now telling us all to avoid voting for the Republican nominee.

Nope, definitely not an Obama plant. Nothing to see here.


5 posted on 04/10/2012 4:56:22 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I would agree with you. There is no need to paint lipstick on the corpse of a useless political party. Let it go under and let the American conservatives unite behind a party that represents them. It’s our only hope.


6 posted on 04/10/2012 4:57:03 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I understand the sentiment. I feel your pain. But many many mistakes and many false connections of dots in your analysis - and you forget the main point: third parties are like virgins. Once they are consummated, they are no longer pure either.

And another point: there are many folks still in the party who hate the party establishment just as much as you do.


7 posted on 04/10/2012 4:57:31 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Considering that there is no one else really still out there, why don’t we start working on a strategy to put Mittens in a corner where he has to do the conservative thing just to stay in the race. It would be a great object lesson for the Congressional “princes” of the GOP to find out what it’s like to be out of funds until they move hard to the right. Don’t just defund the GOP, contact candidates and demand specific positions as a condition of contribution.
The GOP has never had enough “big donors” to do it alone.

Third party is simply saying we want Obama to be Dictator for Life.


8 posted on 04/10/2012 4:58:23 PM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Oh KMA! EVERY FOUR YEARS, conservatives go through this with the GOP establishment!

"Thank you, sir, may I have another!"


9 posted on 04/10/2012 4:58:42 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Agree! 100%!


10 posted on 04/10/2012 4:58:46 PM PDT by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Proceeding with a third party

Maybe the "Falcon Party" is still active and taking members. I think they are on the ballot in 3 and a half counties in Missouri for President. Time to let Pissant back onto FR to lead the movement.

11 posted on 04/10/2012 5:00:24 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Then find a candidate that is not a crazy uncle and win some elections!


12 posted on 04/10/2012 5:00:48 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

bingo. but hey, 0bama and Mitt are indistinguishable, right? I read it here. might as well concede and give barky 4 more.


13 posted on 04/10/2012 5:03:45 PM PDT by eureka! (Bless Our Troops. D*mn the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
So what is your plan to get even one electoral vote when you can’t even win the Republican party nomination?

Get more votes than the two socialists.

You have to get more than 50% of a state to get an electoral vote.

No you don't.

I call BS. Calling Mitt a socialist is a falsehood.

I guess we all just imagined the socialist program he pushed through in Massachusetts. /s

A third party is a recipe for 4 more years of Obama.

The Republicans already cooked up a batch of Obama for 2012.

So, now, all bets are off.

Tough cookies.

Shame on you.

No, shame on you for being motivated by fear instead of principle.

14 posted on 04/10/2012 5:03:55 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Then find a candidate that is not a crazy uncle and win some elections!

Absolutely! But first we have to escape from the Grand Old Plantation. Let the damned party die on the vine. Then maybe the grand poobahs in the NYC-DC corridor might wake up.

Screw the GOP.

15 posted on 04/10/2012 5:03:58 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Third party sounds great. Is their an established party already, because you know just like the gop cheated to get romney in, states and federal people will do everything to stop this. I think people are tired of “politicians”. My husband says their is no such thing as a politician that doesn't lie and can't be bought. Someone and something new is what we need. With God's help maybe our prayers could be answered.
16 posted on 04/10/2012 5:04:22 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Writing in Palin or JimRob. I’ll be able to look myself in the mirror, either way


17 posted on 04/10/2012 5:05:59 PM PDT by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Should we try to create a new third party? Would an existing third party suffice? Let’s discuss.

Not going to try to talk you out of it since people, predictably, throw this idea out every 4 years, but I can assure you that a 3rd party vote will amount to nothing. Your opportunity to push conservatism is within one of the 2 party's. We have been quite successful at that within the GOP at the local and state level, at the national level not so much yet. That is mostly because there simply wasn't a compelling conservative with staying power that could challenge the establishment's hug-the-middle choice (which they will make every time). All this 3rd party talk will come to nothing. You will join about 1% of the population who cast protest votes for the Greens, Libertarians, Constitution Party, etc, etc, etc. No one will notice, care or remember.

18 posted on 04/10/2012 5:06:02 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

“Should we try to create a new third party? Would an existing third party suffice? Let’s discuss.”

The actual goal should be to create a 2nd party to oppose the Demcoms- essentially replacing the Republicans with a new party and forcing people like Romney to join the Democrats where they belong.


19 posted on 04/10/2012 5:06:55 PM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

http://www.selfgovernment.us/about.html

http://www.selfgovernment.us/platform.html

http://www.selfgovernment.us/affiliate.html

http://www.selfgovernment.us/be-a-leader.html

http://www.americaspartynews.com/

http://www.tomhoefling.com/


20 posted on 04/10/2012 5:07:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
I'm ready for third party. I will NOT do the “hold your nose vote” crappola for yet another establishment RINO. The GOP can rot.

Romney is a loser and the GOP has squandered all the inertia and enthusiasm of the Tea Party movement so that they can hold their Party power. They can shove their Massachusetts liberal candidate.

21 posted on 04/10/2012 5:09:06 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

http://www.selfgovernment.us/about.html

http://www.selfgovernment.us/no-donations.html


22 posted on 04/10/2012 5:10:14 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Sign me up. I know who romney is. I will never, never support him. The GOP no longer exists to me.


23 posted on 04/10/2012 5:10:35 PM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

That’s what an alarming number of people seem to be saying.

In the absolute worst case (a ridiculously improbable situation), Romney is no better than Obama. It’s impossible for him to be worse. A more realistic situation is that Romney governs like the moderate he really is, which would be a MASSIVE improvement over what we have.

What I don’t understand is the prevalence of stage one thinking around there. I hear things like “the Republicans are just driving the car off the cliff at 20 MPH instead of 100 MPH.” Well, suppose that’s true. If it’s either driving off at 100 or driving off at 20 (reverse is simply not an option right now) then why would anybody in their right mind not pick the better of the two options?


24 posted on 04/10/2012 5:11:46 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I can’t imagine anyone wanting to run 3rd party and take the heat for re-electing Hussein. Because that is what they would be doing.

Better to start now building a credible party that can win in the future, do better than this years offerings, or else, just stay home and enjoy Barack and his czars for another 4. Only thing is that conservatives won’t ever win again, if they do, they will be just like the British style conservative. So why bother?


25 posted on 04/10/2012 5:11:49 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
I've grown to believe that there are a number of "plants" here on FR.....

pushing a Perot and we'll get another 4 messiah years....

Romney is not my choice, nor a lot of peoples, but he is the choice of all the states so far and he has a huge delegate count....

maybe people better start dreaming up another 4 yrs of bamey on the flag and consider that Romney on his worse day, is at least a patriot, a businessman, and a man who won't kill off the coal and oil industry, nix pipelines,have racist in key govt positions,or have an arrogant wife running around vacationing to the tune of millions of OUR money each year....

when you think of voting 3rd party, just conjure up that American flag with bamey's mug on it....we're just seeing an inkling of what he is capable of doing...

26 posted on 04/10/2012 5:13:50 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
I think people are tired of “politicians”.

LOL. People ALWAYS say this. Try to run a political novice against a polished, skilled politician and see what happens almost every time. And the bigger the office, the more difficult it is for the novice. There is a reason successful politicians generally start out at the very local level and work their way up. Like it or not, politics is a skill. People get better at it. It isn't enough to be right to win elections. If it were, we wouldn't be 16 trillion in debt, have 8.2% unemployment, have gas approaching 5 bucks a gallon, etc. The "regular" non-politician guy/girl is going to get steamrolled almost every single time - and not just here in the US, this is true the world over.

27 posted on 04/10/2012 5:15:14 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
I call BS. Calling Mitt a socialist is a falsehood. A third party is a recipe for 4 more years of Obama.

You want Romney? You vote for him. You defend him. You donate to his campaign. You work for him.

I'm done with the GOP for this election cycle.
28 posted on 04/10/2012 5:18:14 PM PDT by Antoninus (The Republican Party (now a wholly owned subsidiary of Romney, Inc.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
Hey, principle over the country's future, I guess. I am NOT a Mittens fan (*gag*) BUT....

a good GOTV 2010 down ticket Tea Party result will stop him if he plays the Massachusetts politics garbage. Hopefully, more here on FR will realize that. He's no Reagan but could mature in that direction. 'Tis all we got. The alternative is unthinkable. Unless you want reparations, flash mob robs and the occasional jihadi bombing at your malls and churches to become the "new reality" along with pork and beans. Oh, and taxes and the ghey agenda and global warming and green energy and super high gas prices and an unsupportable national debt.......

29 posted on 04/10/2012 5:20:29 PM PDT by eureka! (Bless Our Troops. D*mn the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

“If it’s either driving off at 100 or driving off at 20 (reverse is simply not an option right now) then why would anybody in their right mind not pick the better of the two options?”

For me, it’s because that is the exact same logic that got us to where we are.

I think our Founders would be shaking their heads in disgust to hear things like:

He’ll support abortion slightly less than the other one or

He’ll take fewer of our weapons away or

He thinks gay marriage is OK because...

That is the logic that took us from George Washington to The Won - IMHO.


30 posted on 04/10/2012 5:20:42 PM PDT by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
That’s what an alarming number of people seem to be saying.

We "seem to have been saying it" since 2007. They GOP had fair warning that Romney was a non-starter. They chose to force him on the base, now they can live with the consequences.
31 posted on 04/10/2012 5:21:12 PM PDT by Antoninus (The Republican Party (now a wholly owned subsidiary of Romney, Inc.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

A third party will do for Obama what Ralph Nader did for George Bush. If you can’t convince a majority of the Republican voters to see it your way, you will never convince a majority of all the voters.

Count me out.


32 posted on 04/10/2012 5:21:19 PM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
We have a 3rd party. It is liberterian or Libertarian, depending on your choice.

There are still candidates in both camps who agree with what you want more than you know.

33 posted on 04/10/2012 5:23:26 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

1992 presidential candidacy
Main article: Ross Perot presidential campaign, 1992

On February 20, 1992, he appeared on CNN’s Larry King Live and announced his intention to run as an independent if his supporters could get his name on the ballot in all fifty states. With such declared policies as balancing the federal budget, a firm pro-choice stance on abortion, expansion of the war on drugs, ending outsourcing of jobs, support for gun control, belief in protectionism on trade, advocating the Environmental Protection Agency and enacting electronic direct democracy via “electronic town halls,” he became a potential candidate and soon polled roughly even with the two major party candidates.[21]

Perot’s candidacy received increasing media attention when the competitive phase of the primary season ended for the two major parties. With the insurgent candidacies of Republican Pat Buchanan and Democrat Jerry Brown winding down, Perot was the natural beneficiary of populist resentment toward establishment politicians. On May 25, 1992 he was featured on the cover of Time Magazine with the title “Waiting for Perot,” an allusion to Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot.[22]

Several months before the Democratic and Republican conventions, Perot filled the vacuum of election news, as his supporters began petition drives to get him on the ballot in all fifty states. This sense of momentum was reinforced when Perot employed two savvy campaign managers in Democrat Hamilton Jordan and Republican Ed Rollins.[citation needed] In July, while Perot was pondering whether to run for office, his supporters established a campaign organization United We Stand America. Perot was late in making formal policy proposals, but most of what he did call for were intended to reduce the deficit. He wanted a gasoline tax increase and some cutbacks of Social Security.[citation needed]

By the summer Perot commanded a lead in the presidential race with thirty-nine percent of the vote.[23] By mid-July, the Washington Post reported that Perot’s campaign managers were becoming increasingly disillusioned by his unwillingness to follow their advice[24] to be more specific on issues, and his need to be in full control of operations[24] with such tactics as forcing volunteers to sign loyalty oaths.[25] Perot’s poll numbers began to slip to 25%, and his advisers warned that if he continued to ignore them, he would fall into single digits. Co-manager Hamilton Jordan threatened to quit, and on July 15, Ed Rollins resigned after Perot fired advertisement specialist Hal Riney, who worked with Rollins on the Reagan campaign. Rollins would later claim that a member of the campaign accused him of being a Bush plant with ties to the CIA.[26] Amidst the chaos, Perot’s support fell to 20%.[27] The next day, Perot announced on Larry King Live that he would not seek the presidency. He explained that he did not want the House of Representatives to decide the election if the result caused the electoral college to be split. Perot eventually stated the reason was that he received threats that digitally altered photographs would be released by the Bush campaign to sabotage his daughter’s wedding.[28] Regardless of the reasons for withdrawing, his reputation was badly damaged. Many of his supporters felt betrayed and public opinion polls would subsequently show a large negative view of Perot that was absent prior to his decision to end the campaign.[29]

In September he qualified for all fifty state ballots.


34 posted on 04/10/2012 5:24:48 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum -Mission Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

I agree. I used to live in Ron Paul’s district. There were some not-so-nice people who were all for RP, but had problems with their medication. I eventually returned to the (R) party after being a member of the (L)(non-drug faction) for years.

More evidence that Newt is liberal:

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/53886982-90/utah-romney-gingrich-campaign.html.csp

“Newt Gingrich’s check bounced.

“Utah Elections Director Mark Thomas said a designated agent for the Gingrich campaign brought the filing papers and a check for $500 in March, but the state was notified by the bank that the check had bounced.”


35 posted on 04/10/2012 5:26:18 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Read my post again. I never said this was about purity; this is drawing a line in the sand that we won’t cross no matter what. I would have been perfectly fine voting for Rick Santorum because I believe he’s a true social conservative, just as I would have been fine voting for Newt Gingrich because I believe he’s a fiscal conservative due to his flat tax plan.

The party-line Republicans who claim hate the establishment will never lift a finger against them.


36 posted on 04/10/2012 5:26:31 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

After Obama gets defeated then is the time for third party action. Now all it could do is assure his election. If that happens a third party..any party but the Communist Party will be impossible.


37 posted on 04/10/2012 5:27:33 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

lol I agree with you 100%.. and I find the number of “I’m going third party, I will never vote for anyone but my handpicked candidate” posts suspicious.


38 posted on 04/10/2012 5:28:53 PM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
We "seem to have been saying it" since 2007.

Actually, "I" and a lot of other folks like me have been saying it since 1969.

I held my nose and voted against somebody in every election except for Ronald Reagan and G.W. Bush's 1st term.

I am sick of it.

39 posted on 04/10/2012 5:30:21 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Romney wasn’t forced on us.

We voted for him. We contributed to him. We worked for him. He got the delegates. He won the nomination.

To assert that Romney was forced on us is a lie.


40 posted on 04/10/2012 5:31:28 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Who’s this “we” you’re talking about?


41 posted on 04/10/2012 5:32:48 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I think the line in the sand that we should draw is “Don’t let Obama win.”


42 posted on 04/10/2012 5:33:20 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

That would be ‘We Republicans who support candidates in the Primaries and Caucuses.”


43 posted on 04/10/2012 5:35:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

That sure don’t say much for the voting citizens...the chumps.


44 posted on 04/10/2012 5:36:22 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Romney/Palin might work.


45 posted on 04/10/2012 5:36:37 PM PDT by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Piss off wanker.

NO CULTISTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE


46 posted on 04/10/2012 5:37:14 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum -Mission Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eXe

Read my post. I don’t HAVE a “handpicked candidate.”


47 posted on 04/10/2012 5:37:31 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The only people who suffer are us.

The GOP has been pushing moderates since before I was allowed to vote. They’ve lost as much as they’ve won. Do they learn? Of course not.

We, however, suffer the consequences of hard-left governance.


48 posted on 04/10/2012 5:40:32 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Newt is essentially the 3rd party candidate — unless you’re a member of the moral vanity brigade.


49 posted on 04/10/2012 5:42:08 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
No, it's not impossible for Romney to be worse than Obama. If Obama is re-elected, he won't have control of Congress and will have to fight every step of the way to get anything done. With Romney, every bit of his liberal agenda will be rubber stamped by the GOP-e controlled Congress and it will all be passed. We'll get a new version of Obamacare. We'll get more spending and no balanced budget. We'll get liberals nominated to SCOTUS and confirmed by the Senate. And so on.

What you don't seem to understand is that Romney is simply not an option. What would you do if somebody tried to force you to vote for either: Obama, or Reid, or Pelosi? Would you actually vote for one of those scoundrels for POTUS in the name of doing the least harm?

If the GOP-e pushes the Romney nomination down our throats, it guarantees a third party movement, and that's on them.

50 posted on 04/10/2012 5:43:26 PM PDT by tentmaker (vote for John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson