Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucianOfSamasota

Quick ~ somebody work this out ~ Coal + Air =, then we take the CO2 and convert that to Methane ~ then we burn that again. Remember to account for the additional O from the atmosphere.


21 posted on 04/11/2012 9:06:58 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
You don't need to figure in coal at all.

The chemical reaction for combustion of methane is:

CH4 + 2 O2 → CO2 + 2 H2O (ΔH = −891 kJ/mol (at standard conditions))

Any reaction converting CO2 back into methane will consume 891 kJ/mol if 100% efficient. And no process is 100% efficient. So (and thermodynamics guarantees this result, hence no 'perpetual motion' machines) converting the same chemical reaction back and forth must ALWAYS result in a net energy LOSS. I'm a physicist, not a chemist, but this is pretty basic stuff.

31 posted on 04/11/2012 9:29:20 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson